Impact of RF inhomogeneity correction on image registration of micro MRI rodent brain images

Author(s):  
J.R. Rangarajan ◽  
D. Loeckx ◽  
G. Vande Velde ◽  
T. Dresselaers ◽  
U. Himmelreich ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Mihara ◽  
Norio Iriguchi ◽  
Shogo Ueno

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 70960-70968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Tang ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
Lili Tian ◽  
Lihui Wang ◽  
Yuemin Zhu

Author(s):  
Israna H. Arka ◽  
Kalaivani Chellappan ◽  
Shahizon A. Mukari ◽  
Zhe K. Law ◽  
Ramesh Sahathevan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotta M. Ellingsen ◽  
Jerry L. Prince

Image registration is a crucial step in many medical image analysis procedures such as image fusion, surgical planning, segmentation and labeling, and shape comparison in population or longitudinal studies. A new approach to volumetric intersubject deformable image registration is presented. The method, called Mjolnir, is an extension of the highly successful method HAMMER. New image features in order to better localize points of correspondence between the two images are introduced as well as a novel approach to generate a dense displacement field based upon the weighted diffusion of automatically derived feature correspondences. An extensive validation of the algorithm was performed on T1-weighted SPGR MR brain images from the NIREP evaluation database. The results were compared with results generated by HAMMER and are shown to yield significant improvements in cortical alignment as well as reduced computation time.


MACRo 2015 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Lefkovits ◽  
Szidónia Lefkovits ◽  
Mircea-Florin Vaida

AbstractIn automated image processing the intensity inhomogeneity of MR images causes significant errors. In this work we analyze three algorithms with the purpose of intensity inhomogeneity correction. The well-known N3 algorithm is compared to two more recent approaches: a modified level set method, which is able to deal with intensity inhomogeneity and it is, as well, compared to an adaptation of the fuzzy c-means clustering with intensity inhomogeneity compensation techniques. We evaluate the outcomes of these three algorithms with quantitative performance measures. The measurements are done on the bias fields and on the segmented images. We consider normal brain images obtained from the Montreal Simulated Brain Database.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document