Distinguishing Between Parkinson’s Disease and Essential Tremor Through Video Analytics Using Machine Learning: a Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Kovalenko ◽  
Aleksandr Talitckii ◽  
Anna Anikina ◽  
Aleksei Shcherbak ◽  
Olga Zimniakova ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 261 (5) ◽  
pp. 884-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Wurster ◽  
Annegret Abaza ◽  
Kathrin Brockmann ◽  
Inga Liepelt-Scarfone ◽  
Daniela Berg

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. e44
Author(s):  
Sanghee Moon ◽  
Hyun-Je Song ◽  
Kelly Lyons ◽  
Rajesh Pahwa ◽  
Vibhash Sharma ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 88866-88875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian D. Loaiza Duque ◽  
Antonio J. Sanchez Egea ◽  
Theresa Reeb ◽  
Hernan A. Gonzalez Rojas ◽  
Andres M. Gonzalez-Vargas

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Zamira M Muruzheva ◽  
Dmitry S Traktirov ◽  
Alexander S Zubov ◽  
Nina S Pestereva ◽  
Maria S Tikhomirova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghee Moon ◽  
Hyun-Je Song ◽  
Vibhash D. Sharma ◽  
Kelly E. Lyons ◽  
Rajesh Pahwa ◽  
...  

AbstractParkinson’s disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) are movement disorders that can have similar clinical characteristics including tremor and gait difficulty. These disorders can be misdiagnosed leading to delay in appropriate treatment. The aim of the study was to determine whether gait and balance variables obtained with wearable sensors can be utilized to differentiate between PD and ET using machine learning techniques. Additionally, we compared classification performances of several machine learning models. A balance and gait data set collected from 567 people with PD or ET was investigated. Performance of several machine learning techniques including neural networks (NN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB), were compared using F1-scores. Machine learning models classified PD and ET based on balance and gait characteristics better than chance or logistic regression. The highest F1-score was 0.61 of NN, followed by 0.59 of GB, 0.56 of RF, 0.55 of SVM, 0.53 of DT, and 0.49 of kNN. The results demonstrated the utility of machine learning models to classify different movement disorders. Further study will provide a more accurate clinical tool to help clinical decision-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document