Indirect Measurement of Forest Leaf Area Index Using Path Length Distribution Model and Multispectral Canopy Imager

Author(s):  
Ronghai Hu ◽  
Jinghui Luo ◽  
Guangjian Yan ◽  
Jie Zou ◽  
Xihan Mu
2014 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronghai Hu ◽  
Guangjian Yan ◽  
Xihan Mu ◽  
Jinghui Luo

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. White ◽  
Maria Mar Alsina ◽  
Héctor Nieto ◽  
Lynn G. McKee ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 3475-3484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjian Yan ◽  
Ronghai Hu ◽  
Yiting Wang ◽  
Huazhong Ren ◽  
Wanjuan Song ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Finzel ◽  
Mark S. Seyfried ◽  
Mark A. Weltz ◽  
James R. Kiniry ◽  
Mari-Vaughn V. Johnson ◽  
...  

HortScience ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee F. Johnson ◽  
Lars L. Pierce

The performance of the LI-COR LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer (PCA) for indirect measurement of leaf area index (LAI) was evaluated in vineyards of California's North Coast region. Twelve plots were established, representing vineyards of differing trellis, cultivar, and planting density. Mean LAI ranged from 0.5- to 2.25-m2 leaf area per m2 ground area by direct measurement (defoliation). Indirect LAI derived by a standard two-azimuth, diagonal-transect measurement protocol was significantly related to direct LAI (r2 = 0.78, P ≤ 0.001). However, the PCA underestimated direct LAI by about a factor of two. Narrowing the instrument's conical field of view from 148° to 56° increased indirect LAI by 13% to 60% in vertically trained plots, but still resulted in substantial underestimation of direct values. Use of this PCA protocol in vineyards should therefore be accompanied by direct measurement for calibration purposes.


Author(s):  
Zdeněk Patočka ◽  
Kateřina Novosadová ◽  
Pavel Haninec ◽  
Radek Pokorný ◽  
Tomáš Mikita ◽  
...  

The leaf area index (LAI) is one of the most common leaf area and canopy structure quantifiers. Direct LAI measurement and determination of canopy characteristics in larger areas is unrealistic due to the large number of measurements required to create the distribution model. This study compares the regression models for the ALS-based calculation of LAI, where the effective leaf area index (eLAI) determined by optical methods and the LAI determined by the direct destructive method and developed by allometric equations were used as response variables. LiDAR metrics and the laser penetration index (LPI) were used as predictor variables. The regression models of LPI and eLAI dependency and the LiDAR metrics and eLAI dependency showed coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.75 and 0.92, respectively; the advantage of using LiDAR metrics for more accurate modelling is demonstrated. The model for true LAI estimation reached a R2 of 0.88.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document