Using Deep Learning for Exploration and Recognition of Objects Based on Images

Author(s):  
Stevenson Contreras ◽  
Fernando De La Rosa
Author(s):  
Teodoro Álvarez-Sánchez ◽  
Jesús A. Álvarez-Cedillo ◽  
Roberto Herrera-Charles

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
Yoochan Moon ◽  
Eun-seop Yu ◽  
Jae-min Cha ◽  
Taekyong Lee ◽  
Sanguk Cheon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Bamba ◽  
Shimpei Ogawa ◽  
Michio Itabashi ◽  
Shingo Kameoka ◽  
Takahiro Okamoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Analysis of operative data with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is expected to improve the knowledge and professional skills of surgeons. Identification of objects in videos recorded during surgery can be used for surgical skill assessment and surgical navigation. The objectives of this study were to recognize objects and types of forceps in surgical videos acquired during colorectal surgeries and evaluate detection accuracy.Methods: Images (n=1818) were extracted from 11 surgical videos for model training, and another 500 images were extracted from 6 additional videos for validation. The following 5 types of forceps were selected for annotation: ultrasonic scalpel, grasping, clip, angled (Maryland and right-angled), and spatula. IBM Visual Insights software was used, which incorporates the most popular open-source deep-learning CNN frameworks.Results: In total, 1039/1062 (97.8%) forceps were correctly identified among 500 test images. Calculated recall and precision values were as follows: grasping forceps, 98.1% and 98.0%; ultrasonic scalpel, 99.4% and 93.9%; clip forceps, 96.2% and 92.7%; angled forceps, 94.9% and 100%; and spatula forceps, 98.1% and 94.5%, respectively.Conclusions: Forceps recognition can be achieved with high accuracy using deep-learning models, providing the opportunity to evaluate how forceps are used in various operations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Bamba ◽  
Shimpei Ogawa ◽  
Michio Itabashi ◽  
Shingo Kameoka ◽  
Takahiro Okamoto ◽  
...  

AbstractAnalysis of operative data with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is expected to improve the knowledge and professional skills of surgeons. Identification of objects in videos recorded during surgery can be used for surgical skill assessment and surgical navigation. The objectives of this study were to recognize objects and types of forceps in surgical videos acquired during colorectal surgeries and evaluate detection accuracy. Images (n = 1818) were extracted from 11 surgical videos for model training, and another 500 images were extracted from 6 additional videos for validation. The following 5 types of forceps were selected for annotation: ultrasonic scalpel, grasping, clip, angled (Maryland and right-angled), and spatula. IBM Visual Insights software was used, which incorporates the most popular open-source deep-learning CNN frameworks. In total, 1039/1062 (97.8%) forceps were correctly identified among 500 test images. Calculated recall and precision values were as follows: grasping forceps, 98.1% and 98.0%; ultrasonic scalpel, 99.4% and 93.9%; clip forceps, 96.2% and 92.7%; angled forceps, 94.9% and 100%; and spatula forceps, 98.1% and 94.5%, respectively. Forceps recognition can be achieved with high accuracy using deep-learning models, providing the opportunity to evaluate how forceps are used in various operations.


Author(s):  
Stellan Ohlsson
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-294
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Foucart ◽  
Augustin Chavanne ◽  
Jérôme Bourriau

Nombreux sont les apports envisagés de l’Intelligence Artificielle (IA) en médecine. En orthodontie, plusieurs solutions automatisées sont disponibles depuis quelques années en imagerie par rayons X (analyse céphalométrique automatisée, analyse automatisée des voies aériennes) ou depuis quelques mois (analyse automatique des modèles numériques, set-up automatisé; CS Model +, Carestream Dental™). L’objectif de cette étude, en deux parties, est d’évaluer la fiabilité de l’analyse automatisée des modèles tant au niveau de leur numérisation que de leur segmentation. La comparaison des résultats d’analyse des modèles obtenus automatiquement et par l’intermédiaire de plusieurs orthodontistes démontre la fiabilité de l’analyse automatique; l’erreur de mesure oscillant, in fine, entre 0,08 et 1,04 mm, ce qui est non significatif et comparable avec les erreurs de mesures inter-observateurs rapportées dans la littérature. Ces résultats ouvrent ainsi de nouvelles perspectives quand à l’apport de l’IA en Orthodontie qui, basée sur le deep learning et le big data, devrait permettre, à moyen terme, d’évoluer vers une orthodontie plus préventive et plus prédictive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document