scholarly journals An optimal coding strategy for the binary multi-way relay channel

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Ong ◽  
Sarah Johnson ◽  
Christopher Kellett

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huyen-Chi Bui ◽  
Hugo Meric ◽  
Jerome Lacan ◽  
Marie-Laure Boucheret


Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 965
Author(s):  
Marta Zárraga-Rodríguez ◽  
Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez ◽  
Xabier Insausti

In this paper, we present a low-complexity coding strategy to encode (compress) finite-length data blocks of Gaussian vector sources. We show that for large enough data blocks of a Gaussian asymptotically wide sense stationary (AWSS) vector source, the rate of the coding strategy tends to the lowest possible rate. Besides being a low-complexity strategy it does not require the knowledge of the correlation matrix of such data blocks. We also show that this coding strategy is appropriate to encode the most relevant Gaussian vector sources, namely, wide sense stationary (WSS), moving average (MA), autoregressive (AR), and ARMA vector sources.



2009 ◽  
Vol E92-B (2) ◽  
pp. 683-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan SUN ◽  
Sheng MENG ◽  
Yan WANG ◽  
Xiaohu YOU


Author(s):  
Puripong SUTHISOPAPAN ◽  
Kenta KASAI ◽  
Anupap MEESOMBOON ◽  
Virasit IMTAWIL ◽  
Kohichi SAKANIWA


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Ching Chiu ◽  
Yu-Ting Cheng ◽  
Cheng-Hwa Yang


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 160940692096648
Author(s):  
Melissa Beresford ◽  
J. Leah Jones ◽  
Julia C. Bausch ◽  
Clinton F. Williams ◽  
Amber Wutich ◽  
...  

This paper examines the effect of having a third-party scientific expert present in stakeholder interviews. The study was conducted as part of a larger project on stakeholder engagement for natural resource management in the Verde Valley region of Arizona. We employed an experimental design, conducting stakeholder interviews both with and without an identified scientific expert present. Our sample consisted of 12 pairs of interviewees (24 total participants) who we matched based on their occupation, sex, and spatial proximity. For each pair, the scientific expert was present as a third party in one interview and absent in the other. We used a word-based coding strategy to code all interview responses for three known areas of sensitivity among the study population (risk, gatekeeping, and competence). We then performed both quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare responses across the two interview groups. We found that the presence of a scientific expert did not have a statistically significant effect on the mention of sensitive topics among stakeholders. However, our qualitative results show that the presence of a scientific expert had subtle influences on the ways that stakeholders discussed sensitive topics, particularly in placing emphasis on their own credibility and knowledge. Our findings indicate that researchers may be able to pursue collaborative, interdisciplinary research designs with multiple researchers present during interviews without concerns of strongly influencing data elicitation on sensitive topics. However, researchers should be cognizant of the subtle ways in which the presence of a third-party expert may influence the credibility claims and knowledge assertions made by respondents when a third-party expert is present during stakeholder interviews.



Author(s):  
Sha Wei ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Lizhong Zheng ◽  
Hang Su


Author(s):  
Lawrence Ong ◽  
Christopher M. Kellett ◽  
Sarah J. Johnson
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document