scholarly journals Microwave Observations of Daily Antarctic Sea-Ice Edge Expansion and Contraction Rates

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Allen ◽  
D.G. Long
Polar Record ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (207) ◽  
pp. 355-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
William K. de la Mare

AbstractA claim that there are substantial discrepancies between direct observations of the Antarctic sea-ice edge and the implicit sea-ice edge derived from whaling records is rebutted. The claimeddiscrepancies are shown to arise largely from comparing the two types of information from different dates. A date-corrected comparison shows generally good agreement between the southernmost limit of whaling and the most comprehensive of the early monthly ice charts of Antarctica. The remaining apparent discrepancies are accounted for either by very limited data or the complex nature of the ice edge in the region of the Weddell ice tongue. Correlation of the southernmost limits of whaling with direct observations of the ice edge provides the most powerful calibration of the relationship between them


Polar Record ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (199) ◽  
pp. 345-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Vaughan

SummeryThe subject of retreating global sea-ice extent is a matter of grave concern, and any new method that promises reliable information about past ice-extent parameters must be welcomed. However, the method proposed by De la Mare should be viewed with caution for four reasons. First, his predictions of sea-ice extent do not correspond with known observations of sea-ice extent from research published in 1936 and 1972. Second, his predictions correlate much more closely with the whale-sighting data recorded by Hansen (1936). Third, since Hansen's sea-ice extent data do not correspond closely with his whalesighting data, it must be questioned whether whale-based data should be used for retrospective predictions relating to sea-ice extent. And finally, information from the IWC indicates that De la Mare's datasets are not considered accurate. Predicting sea-ice edge extent is complex, and, it would seem, a purely biological approach is not necessarily the most accurate method to adopt.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (16) ◽  
pp. 9719-9727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Zampieri ◽  
Helge F. Goessling ◽  
Thomas Jung

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2669-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars-Anders Breivik ◽  
Steinar Eastwood ◽  
Thomas Lavergne
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Edge ◽  

1985 ◽  
Vol 90 (C2) ◽  
pp. 3185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin D. Muench ◽  
James D. Schumacher

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2241-2253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C. Sime ◽  
Dominic Hodgson ◽  
Thomas J. Bracegirdle ◽  
Claire Allen ◽  
Bianca Perren ◽  
...  

Abstract. Latitudinal shifts in the Southern Ocean westerly wind jet could drive changes in the glacial to interglacial ocean CO2 inventory. However, whilst CMIP5 model results feature consistent future-warming jet shifts, there is considerable disagreement in deglacial-warming jet shifts. We find here that the dependence of pre-industrial (PI) to Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) jet shifts on PI jet position, or state dependency, explains less of the shifts in jet simulated by the models for the LGM compared with future-warming scenarios. State dependence is also weaker for intensity changes, compared to latitudinal shifts in the jet. Winter sea ice was considerably more extensive during the LGM. Changes in surface heat fluxes, due to this sea ice change, probably had a large impact on the jet. Models that both simulate realistically large expansions in sea ice and feature PI jets which are south of 50° S show an increase in wind speed around 55° S and can show a poleward shift in the jet between the PI and the LGM. However, models with the PI jet positioned equatorwards of around 47° S do not show this response: the sea ice edge is too far from the jet for it to respond. In models with accurately positioned PI jets, a +1° difference in the latitude of the sea ice edge tends to be associated with a −0.85° shift in the 850 hPa jet. However, it seems that around 5° of expansion of LGM sea ice is necessary to hold the jet in its PI position. Since the Gersonde et al. (2005) data support an expansion of more than 5°, this result suggests that a slight poleward shift and intensification was the most likely jet change between the PI and the LGM. Without the effect of sea ice, models simulate poleward-shifted westerlies in warming climates and equatorward-shifted westerlies in colder climates. However, the feedback of sea ice counters and reverses the equatorward trend in cooler climates so that the LGM winds were more likely to have also been shifted slightly poleward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document