scholarly journals Applicability of Different Mono Camera-based Aircraft Sense and Avoid Methods for Steady and Linear Path Intruders

Author(s):  
Peter Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Kyle Foerster ◽  
Michael Mullins ◽  
Naima Kaabouch ◽  
William Semke

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Glozman ◽  
Anthony Narkawicz ◽  
Ishay Kamon ◽  
Franco Callari ◽  
Amir Navot
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ascough ◽  
Fernanda Duarte ◽  
Robert Paton

The base-catalyzed rearrangement of arylindenols is a rare example of a suprafacial [1,3]-hydrogen atom transfer. The mechanism has been proposed to proceed via sequential [1,5]-sigmatropic shifts, which occur in a selective sense and avoid an achiral intermediate. A computational analysis using quantum chemistry casts serious doubt on these suggestions: these pathways have enormous activation barriers and in constrast to what is observed experimentally, they overwhelmingly favor a racemic product. Instead we propose that a suprafacial [1,3]-prototopic shift occurs in a two-step deprotonation/reprotonation sequence. This mechanism is favored by 15 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> over that previously proposed. Most importantly, this is also consistent with stereospecificity since reprotonation occurs rapidly on the same p-face. We have used explicitly-solvated molecular dynamics studies to study the persistence and condensed-phase dynamics of the intermediate ion-pair formed in this reaction. Chirality transfer is the result of a particularly resilient contact ion-pair, held together by electrostatic attraction and a critical NH···p interaction which ensures that this species has an appreciable lifetime even in polar solvents such as DMSO and MeOH.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouyu Zhang ◽  
Yunfeng Cao ◽  
Meng Ding ◽  
Likui Zhuang ◽  
Weiwen Yao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 14742-14747
Author(s):  
Zhouyu Zhang ◽  
Youmin Zhang ◽  
Yunfeng Cao ◽  
Meng Ding
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 344-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramanian Ramasamy ◽  
Roberto Sabatini ◽  
Alessandro Gardi ◽  
Jing Liu

Author(s):  
Douglas Marshall ◽  
Benjamin Trapnell ◽  
Julio Mendez ◽  
Brian Berseth ◽  
Richard Schultz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1139-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Accardo ◽  
Giancarmine Fasano ◽  
Lidia Forlenza ◽  
Antonio Moccia ◽  
Attilio Rispoli

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 95-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Radmanesh ◽  
Manish Kumar ◽  
Paul H. Guentert ◽  
Mohammad Sarim

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently attracted the attention of researchers due to their numerous potential civilian applications. However, current robot navigation technologies need further development for efficient application to various scenarios. One key issue is the “Sense and Avoid” capability, currently of immense interest to researchers. Such a capability is required for safe operation of UAVs in civilian domain. For autonomous decision making and control of UAVs, several path-planning and navigation algorithms have been proposed. This is a challenging task to be carried out in a 3D environment, especially while accounting for sensor noise, uncertainties in operating conditions, and real-time applicability. Heuristic and non-heuristic or exact techniques are the two solution methodologies that categorize path-planning algorithms. The aim of this paper is to carry out a comprehensive and comparative study of existing UAV path-planning algorithms for both methods. Three different obstacle scenarios test the performance of each algorithm. We have compared the computational time and solution optimality, and tested each algorithm with variations in the availability of global and local obstacle information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document