What Were They Thinking?: Refining Conceptual Assessments Using Think-Aloud Problem Solving

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Kathleen E. Wage ◽  
John R. Buck ◽  
Jill K. Nelson ◽  
Margret A. Hjalmarson
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Liska Yanti Pane ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Asrial Asrial

This research aims to describe logical thinking process of a logical-mathematical intelligence student. We employ qualitative method to disclose the subject’s learning process. Data are collected by interview and modified think aloud methods. The results show that subject has capability to find and organize problems and data correctly. Subject describes conditions that are needed to do the steps of problem solving strategy. The steps are done systematically until the end of problem solving process.


Author(s):  
Imelda Aisah Sarip ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Bambang Hariyadi

The aim of this research is to describe creative thinking process of linguistic type student in biology problem solving. This research is conducted to linguistic intelligence type of subject at SMPN 6 Kota Jambi. SL the subject was selected based on the aim of the research. Data collection is conducted by interview and a modified think aloud method. Data is analyzed based on creative thinking process purposed by Polya.The result of this research shows that SL could find and arrange the given problems and collect data correctly and appropriately. The problem solving steps is done systematically to the end of problem solving process. The last steps problem solving, SL does checking while doing scratching to make sure that the written answers meet her need.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
Ninik Mutianingsih ◽  
Lydia Lia Prayitno ◽  
Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan

This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.


2010 ◽  
Vol 44-47 ◽  
pp. 4081-4083
Author(s):  
Qi Fan ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Ling Hua Jiang ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Feng Hou

Knowledge acquisition is the first step in building an expert system. However, it is very difficult to find out the problem-solving approaches from a human expert completely and correctly. Here we implemented the Think-aloud experiment with an expert in architecture. By coding and analyzing the designing process, other researchers could proceed our research and find out the cognitive models corresponded to the approaches and strategies of how experts solved the problems encountered during the normal designing process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Tsania Al'afifah
Keyword(s):  

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh deskripsi tentang penerapan model pembelajaran Think Aloud Pair Problem solving (TAPPS), kemampuan komunikais matematis siswa dan hasil belajar matematika siswa pada pembelajaran matematika kelas VIII MTs Asy Syafi’iyah Gondang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian kualitatif yang mengacu pada model Miles dan Huberman yakni pengumpulan data reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Tehnik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu wawancara, tes dan dokumentasi. Hasil dari  penelitian ini yaitu penerapan model pembelajaran Think Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) berjalan dengan baik, siswa lebih mudah memahami materi yang diberikan, hasil belajar siswa lebih baik daripada sebelumnya. Berdasarkan indikator yang ada, siswa berkemampuan komunikasi tinggi mencapai ketiga inidkator, siswa berkemampuan komunikasi sedang kesulitan mencapai indikator ketiga dan siswa dengan kemampuan komunikasi rendah kesulitan mencapai indikator kedua dan ketiga.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. ar42
Author(s):  
Regina F. Frey ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel ◽  
Diane M. Bunce ◽  
Michael J. Cahill ◽  
Martin D. Perry

Students’ concept-building approaches (abstraction vs. exemplar), identified a priori with a cognitive-psychology laboratory task, have been extended to learning complex topics in general chemistry. Here, the effect concept-building approaches have on the problem-solving behaviors of average-achieving students was probed via think-aloud interviews.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document