scholarly journals Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating alternative software development process configurations

Author(s):  
T.R. Anderson ◽  
P.K. Ghavami
Author(s):  
Othmane Rahmaoui ◽  
Kamal Souali ◽  
Mohammad Ouzzif

<strong>Today traceability is a buzz word and it used in several domains like healthcare, food industry and transportation sectors. In Information Technology, traceability plays a very important role and it can be defined in various ways, depending on the environment and process under consideration. In this paper we are presenting just an idea of a new approach to improve the software development process with the traceability management in order to implement and test the method to show the benefits of using it.</strong>


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Shero ◽  
Sara Ann Hart

Using methods like linear regression or latent variable models, researchers are often interested in maximizing explained variance and identifying the importance of specific variables within their models. These models are useful for understanding general ideas and trends, but often give limited insight into the individuals within said models. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), is a method with roots in organizational management that make such insights possible. Unlike models mentioned above, DEA does not explain variance. Instead, it explains how efficiently an individual utilizes their inputs to produce outputs, and identifies which input is not being utilized optimally. This paper provides readers with a brief history and past usages of DEA from organizational management, public health, and educational administration fields, while also describing the underlying math and processes behind said model. This paper then extends the usage of this method into the psychology field using two separate studies. First, using data from the Project KIDS dataset, DEA is demonstrated using a simple view of reading framework identifying individual efficiency levels in using reading-based skills to achieve reading comprehension, determining which skills are being underutilized, and classifying and comparing new subsets of readers. Three new subsets of readers were identified using this method, with direct implications leading to more targeted interventions. Second, DEA was used to measure individuals’ efficiency in regulating aggressive behavior given specific personality traits or related skills. This study found that despite comparable levels of component skills and personality traits, significant differences were found in efficiency to regulate aggressive behavior on the basis of gender and feelings of provocation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document