A simple predictive current control of a single-phase matrix converter

Author(s):  
M. Rivera ◽  
J. Munoz ◽  
C. Baier ◽  
J. Rodriguez ◽  
J. Espinoza ◽  
...  
Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3845
Author(s):  
Goh Teck Chiang ◽  
Takahide Sugiyama

This paper discusses three methods of modulation for a single-phase isolated matrix converter. The matrix converter is combined with a transformer integration to perform power decoupling control in order to reduce the number of component and capacitor volumes. Due to the reason of (i) Alternating current (AC/AC) direct conversion and (ii) transformer integration, obtaining a clean sinusoidal grid current waveform in the modulation of matrix converter (MC) is important. Three methods of modulation are compared in terms of control complexity, quality waveform, and inductive-capacitive-inductive (LCL) filter sizing. The principal control of each method is described. Finally, a prototype was tested to verify the validity and the effectiveness of grid current control and power decoupling in the spoken circuit structure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Mizutani ◽  
Hirotaka Koizumi ◽  
Kentaro Hirose ◽  
Kazunari Ishibashi

Author(s):  
Yong Yang ◽  
Jianyu Pan ◽  
Huiqing Wen ◽  
Mingdi Fan ◽  
Rong Chen ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3230
Author(s):  
Milovan Majstorovic ◽  
Marco Rivera ◽  
Leposava Ristic ◽  
Patrick Wheeler

The operation of single-phase Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) is analyzed in the paper. A mathematical model of the converter is developed and described, based on which the structure and selection of parameters for Classical Control and Optimal Switching State Model Predictive Control (OSS-MPC) are defined. Additionally, the procedure for the determination of circuit parameters, such as submodule capacitance and arm inductance, is described and carried out. The listed control methods are designed and evaluated in Virtual Hardware-in-the-Loop together with single-phase MMC power circuit, regarding three control objectives: AC current control, voltage balancing control and circulating current control. Control methods are evaluated for both steady-state and transient performance and compared based on nine criteria: AC current reference tracking, THD of AC current and voltage, submodule capacitor voltage balancing, total submodule voltage control, circulating current magnitude and THD, number of control parameters and computational complexity. This is the first time that a fair comparison between Classical Control and MPC is considered in literature, resulting in superior performance of both control methods regarding four different criteria and the same performance regarding AC current reference tracking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document