A comparative study of two trajectory tracking controllers for an autonomous robot vehicle

AbstractA comparative study of model predictive control (MPC) schemes and robust $$H_{\infty }$$ H ∞ state feedback control (RSC) method for trajectory tracking is proposed in this paper. The main objective of this paper is to compare MPC and RSC controllers’ performance in tracking predefined trajectory under different scenarios. MPC controller is designed based on the simple longitudinal-yaw-lateral motions of a single-track vehicle with a linear tire, which is an approximation of the more realistic model of a vehicle with double-track motion with a non-linear tire mode. RSC is designed on the basis of the same method as adopted for the MPC controller to achieve a fair comparison. Then, three test cases are built in CarSim-Simulink joint platform. Specifically, the verification test is used to test the tracking accuracy of MPC and RSC controller under well road conditions. Besides, the double lane change test with low road adhesion is designed to find the maximum velocity that both controllers can carry out while guaranteeing stability. Furthermore, an extreme curve test is built where the road adhesion changes suddenly, in order to test the performance of both controllers under extreme conditions. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of MPC and RSC under different scenarios are also discussed.

Download Full-text

Comparative Study of Trajectory Tracking Control for Automated Vehicles via Model Predictive Control and Robust H-infinity State Feedback Control

10.21203/rs.3.rs-28893/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kai Yang ◽

Xiaolin TANG ◽

Yechen Qin ◽

Yanjun Huang ◽

Hong Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Feedback Control ◽

Model Predictive Control ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Predictive Control ◽

Trajectory Tracking ◽

State Feedback ◽

Maximum Velocity ◽

State Feedback Control ◽

Lane Change ◽

Double Lane Change

Abstract A comparative study of model predictive control (MPC) schemes and robust A state feedback control (RSC) method for trajectory tracking, is proposed in this paper. Both MPC-based and RSC-based tracking controllers are designed on the basis of a 3-DOF vehicle model, including longitudinal, lateral and yaw motions. The main objective of this paper is to compare both controllers’ performance in tracking expected trajectory under different scenarios. Therefore, three cases, namely, verification test, double lane change test and curve test, were built in Carsim-Simulink joint platform. The simulation results indicate that MPC controller performed better in terms of accuracy and responding time under well driving conditions. However, in the test of double lane change manoeuvre where the road adhesion was set as 0.2, the maximum velocity RSC can execute was 14m/s, while that for MPC was 10m/s. In addition, in the curve test, the maximum velocity MPC can carry out was only 9m/s and that for RSC was 12m/s. In conclusion, RSC was robust and stable when the driving conditions was worse, while MPC was prone to be unstable.

Download Full-text