Automation of Tests and Comparative Analysis between Manual and Automated testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arundhatti Bezbaruah ◽  
Bhanu Pratap ◽  
Sandeep B Hake
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Automated Testing

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of frameworks used in automated testing on example of TestNG and WebdriverIO

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 100-106
Author(s):  
Alla Shtokal ◽  
Jakub Smołka
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Automated Testing ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Test Execution ◽  
Cpu Usage ◽  
Run Test ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Test Scenarios

The article presents a comparative analysis of frameworks supporting the development of automated tests for defined test scenarios. The comparative study concerned the TestNG and WebDriverIO frameworks. The overview of the tool has been analyzed both in terms of the test development process as well as the speed and efficiency of their execution. The website github.com was used for the purposes of the work. This application was used to run test scripts written in both frameworks. The results were compared by five defined criteria: the time of running the test files in different browser operation modes, the average value of memory and CPU usage during the test execution. The summary includes the evaluation of the compared frameworks.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of solutions used in automated testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 156-163
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Dorota Wac ◽  
Tomasz Kamil Watras ◽  
Grzegorz Kozieł
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Automated Testing ◽  
Specific Test ◽  
Subjective Evaluations ◽  
Programming Skills ◽  
Test Scenarios

The article presents a comparative analysis of tools supporting the production of automated tests for specific test scenarios. Within the framework of the research, the described tools were installed and then their functionalities were described. Using each of the tools, author's automatic tests were written and performed. The tool discussion was examined both in terms of the process of creating the tests and the speed of their execution. In addition, the selected tools were evaluated and subjective evaluations of the comfort of using the tool were taken into account, taking into account aspects such as the ease of installation and configuration of the tool, the need for programming skills, the simplicity of creating tests, additional functionalities and access to documentation. The summary includes the evaluation of the compared applications, and also discusses specific cases for which the tool will work better.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of solutions used in Automated Testing of Internet Applications

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Magdalena Psujek ◽  
Aleksandra Radzik ◽  
Grzegorz Kozieł
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Web Applications ◽  
Automatic Testing ◽  
Automated Testing ◽  
Functional Testing ◽  
Internet Applications ◽  
Test Scenarios ◽  
Programming Frameworks

This article is devoted to the comparison of the effectiveness of solutions used in automatic testing of web applications. In order to carry out the analysis, test scenarios were created and tests were carried out using each of the tested programming frameworks (Selenium WebDriver, Cucumber, Ranorex, Robot Framework, Cypress, Unified Functional Testing, TestComplete and Katalon Studio). The study showed that there is no single best tool that meets all the requirements. Taking into account the analyzed aspects of effectiveness, the TestComplete program was the best, however, when choosing a solution, the team's skills and project specification should be taken into account.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document