A Haptic Feedback System for Lower-Limb Prostheses

Author(s):  
R.E. Fan ◽  
M.O. Culjat ◽  
Chih-Hung King ◽  
M.L. Franco ◽  
R. Boryk ◽  
...  
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1844
Author(s):  
McNiel-Inyani Keri ◽  
Ahmed W. Shehata ◽  
Paul D. Marasco ◽  
Jacqueline S. Hebert ◽  
Albert H. Vette

Advances in lower-limb prosthetic technologies have facilitated the restoration of ambulation; however, users of such technologies still experience reduced balance control, also due to the absence of proprioceptive feedback. Recent efforts have demonstrated the ability to restore kinesthetic feedback in upper-limb prosthesis applications; however, technical solutions to trigger the required muscle vibration and provide automated feedback have not been explored for lower-limb prostheses. The study’s first objective was therefore to develop a feedback system capable of tracking lower-limb movement and automatically triggering a muscle vibrator to induce the kinesthetic illusion. The second objective was to investigate the developed system’s ability to provide kinesthetic feedback in a case participant. A low-cost, wireless feedback system, incorporating two inertial measurement units to trigger a muscle vibrator, was developed and tested in an individual with limb loss above the knee. Our system had a maximum communication delay of 50 ms and showed good tracking of Gaussian and sinusoidal movement profiles for velocities below 180 degrees per second (error < 8 degrees), mimicking stepping and walking, respectively. We demonstrated in the case participant that the developed feedback system can successfully elicit the kinesthetic illusion. Our work contributes to the integration of sensory feedback in lower-limb prostheses, to increase their use and functionality.


Author(s):  
Ilaria Cesini ◽  
Giacomo Spigler ◽  
Sahana Prasanna ◽  
Domitilla Taxis ◽  
Filippo Dell’Agnello ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sam Shi ◽  
Matthew J. Leineweber ◽  
Jan Andrysek

Vibrotactile feedback may be able to compensate for the loss of sensory input in lower-limb prosthesis users. Designing an effective vibrotactile feedback system would require that users could perceive and correctly respond to vibrotactile stimuli applied by the tactors. Our study explored three key tactor configuration variables (i.e. vibratory intensity, prosthetic pressure, spacing between adjacent tactors) through two experiments. The vibration propagation experiment investigated the effects of tactor configurations on vibratory amplitude at the prosthesis-limb interface. Results revealed a positive relationship between vibratory amplitude and intensity, and a negative relationship between vibratory amplitude and prosthetic pressure. The vibrotactile perception experiment investigated the effects of tactor configurations on user response accuracy, and found that greater spacing between tactors, and higher prosthetic pressure resulted in more accurate responses from the subjects. These findings inform the design of a vibrotactile feedback system for use in lower-limb prostheses: 1) the tactors may be best placed in areas of slightly elevated pressure at the prosthesis-limb interface; 2) a higher vibratory intensity level should improve performance for vibrotactile feedback systems; and 3) more spacing between adjacent tactors improves user response accuracy.


Author(s):  
Astrini Sie ◽  
Jonathan Realmuto ◽  
Eric Rombokas

Though there are a variety of prosthetic limbs that address the motor deficits associated with amputation, there has been relatively little progress in restoring sensation. Prosthetic limbs provide little direct sensory feedback of the forces they encounter in the environment, but “closing the loop” between sensation and action can make a great difference in performance [1]. For users of lower limb prostheses, stair descent is a difficult and dangerous task. The difficulty in stair descent can be attributed to three different factors: 1) Absence of tactile and haptic sensations at the bottom of the foot. Although force on the prosthetic socket provides some haptic feedback of the terrain being stepped on, this feedback does not provide information on the location of the staircase edge. 2) Insufficient ankle flexion of lower limb prostheses. Dorsiflexion of the physiological ankle during stair descent is about 27°. Even prostheses that provide active dorsiflexion provide less than this number, and regular prostheses provide almost no ankle dorsiflexion. The first two factors are analogous to the sensation of stair descent for someone without amputation wearing ski boots. 3) Prosthetic feet are optimized for flat-ground walking, offering undesirable energy storage at ankle flexion and energy return at toe-off. This can result in unwanted extra energy at the end of stance phase, propelling the user forward down the stairs. Most lower limb prosthesis designs focus on flat ground walking, but there has been less progress in addressing the challenges of stair descent. One technique that users of prosthetic lower limbs can use for addressing these challenges is to employ an “overhanging toe” foot placement strategy. Under this strategy, the edge of the staircase is used as a pivot point for the foot to roll over the stair. This reduces the need for ankle flexion by allowing the knee and hip to compensate, and avoids storing energy in the prosthetic spring. This strategy is dynamic, and requires the user to know the amount of toe overhang to adjust the movement of the rest of the body. Most haptic devices built to assist individuals wearing prostheses focus on upper extremity tasks [2–4] or standing and walking [5,6]. Whereas previous lower limb sensory replacement systems have targeted standing measures, here we focus on stair descent. The system provides cues of the stair edge location via vibrotactile stimulations on the thigh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document