Modeling and Interpretation of Tidal Turbine Vibration Through Weighted Least Squares Regression

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1252-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant S. Galloway ◽  
Victoria M. Catterson ◽  
Craig Love ◽  
Andrew Robb ◽  
Thomas Fay
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Myhre ◽  
Daniel R. Jeske ◽  
Michael Rennie ◽  
Yingtao Bi

A heteroscedastic linear regression model is developed from plausible assumptions that describe the time evolution of performance metrics for equipment. The inherited motivation for the related weighted least squares analysis of the model is an essential and attractive selling point to engineers with interest in equipment surveillance methodologies. A simple test for the significance of the heteroscedasticity suggested by a data set is derived and a simulation study is used to evaluate the power of the test and compare it with several other applicable tests that were designed under different contexts. Tolerance intervals within the context of the model are derived, thus generalizing well-known tolerance intervals for ordinary least squares regression. Use of the model and its associated analyses is illustrated with an aerospace application where hundreds of electronic components are continuously monitored by an automated system that flags components that are suspected of unusual degradation patterns.


2011 ◽  
Vol 130-134 ◽  
pp. 730-733
Author(s):  
Narong Phothi ◽  
Somchai Prakancharoen

This research proposed a comparison of accuracy based on data imputation between unconstrained structural equation modeling (Uncon-SEM) and weighted least squares (WLS) regression. This model is developed by University of California, Irvine (UCI) and measured using the mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE). Experimental data set is created using the waveform generator that contained 21 indicators (1,200 samples) and divided into two groups (1,000 for training and 200 for testing groups). In fact, training group was analyzed by three main factors (F1, F2, and F3) for creating the models. The result of the experiment show MMRE of Uncon-SEM method based on the testing group is 34.29% (accuracy is 65.71%). In contrast, WLS method produces MMRE for testing group is 55.54% (accuracy is 44.46%). So, Uncon-SEM is high accuracy and MMRE than WLS method that is 21.25%.


Author(s):  
Cécile Haberstich ◽  
Anthony Nouy ◽  
Guillaume Perrin

One of the most challenging tasks in computational science is the approximation of high-dimensional functions. Most of the time, only a few information on the functions is available, and approximating high-dimensional functions requires exploiting low-dimensional structures of these functions. In this work, the approximation of a function u is built using point evaluations of the function, where these evaluations are selected adaptively. Such problems are encountered when the function represents the output of a black-box computer code, a system or a physical experiment for a given value of a set of input variables. This algorithm relies on an extension of principal components analysis (PCA) to multivariate functions in order to estimate the tensors $v_{\alpha}$. In practice, the PCA is realized on sample-based projections of the function u, using interpolation or least-squares regression. Least-squares regression can provide a stable projection but it usually requires a high number of evaluations of u, which is not affordable when one evaluation is very costly. In [1] the authors proposed an optimal weighted least-squares method, with a choice of weights and samples that garantee an approximation error of the order of the best approximation error using a minimal number of samples. We here present an extension of this methodology for the approximation in tree-based format, where optimal weighted least-squares method is used for the projection onto tensor product spaces. This approach will be compared with a strategy using standard least-squares method or interpolation (as proposed in [2]).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document