Background: Freehand quasistatic strain imaging can reveal qualitative information about tissue stiffness with good spatial accuracy. Clinical trials, however, repeatedly cite instability and variable signal-to-noise ratio as significant drawbacks. Methods: This study investigates three post-processing strategies for quasistatic strain imaging. Normalization divides the strain by an estimate of the stress field, the intention being to reduce sensitivity to variable applied stress. Persistence aims to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by time-averaging multiple frames. The persistence scheme presented in this article operates at the pixel level, weighting each frame's contribution by an estimate of the strain precision. Precision-based display presents the clinician with an image in which regions of indeterminate strain are obscured behind a colour wash. This is achieved using estimates of strain precision that are faithfully propagated through the various stages of signal processing. Results and discussion: The post-processing strategy is evaluated qualitatively on scans of a breast biopsy phantom and in vivo head and neck examinations. Strain images processed in this manner are observed to benefit from improved stability and signal-to-noise ratio. There are, however, limitations. In unusual though conceivable circumstances, the normalization procedure might suppress genuine stiffness variations evident in the unprocessed strain images. In different circumstances, the raw strain images might fail to capture significant stiffness variations, a situation that no amount of post-processing can improve. Conclusion: The clinical utility of freehand quasistatic strain imaging can be improved by normalization, precision-weighted pixel-level persistence and precision-based display. The resulting images are stable and generally exhibit a better signal-to-noise ratio than any of the original, unprocessed strain images.
Comparison of Displacement Tracking Algorithms for in Vivo Electrode Displacement Elastography
