Non-surgical management of thyroid nodules – the role of ablative therapies

Context After a thorough evaluation most thyroid nodules are deemed of no clinical consequence and can be observed. However, when they are compressive, toxic, or involved by papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) surgery or RAI (if toxic) are the treatments of choice. Both interventions can lead to hypothyroidism and other adverse outcomes (e.g. scar, dysphonia, logistical limitation with RAI). Active surveillance might be used for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) initially, but anxiety leads many cases to surgery later. Several ablative therapies have thus evolved over the last few years aimed at treating these nodules while avoiding described risks. Cases We present 4 cases of thyroid lesions causing concerns (compressive symptoms, thyrotoxicosis, anxiety with active surveillance of PTMC). The common denominator is patients’ attempt to preserve thyroid function, bringing into focus percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and thermal ablation techniques (radiofrequency ablation – RFA – being the most common). We discuss the evidence supporting these approaches and compare them with standard therapy, where evidence exists. We discuss additional considerations for the utilization of these therapies, their side-effects and conclude with a simplified description of how these procedures are performed. Conclusions Thermal ablation, particularly RFA, is becoming an attractive option for managing a subgroup of solid thyroid nodules while PEI has a role in managing thyroid cysts and a select group of PTMC. Their role in the algorithm of thyroid nodule management is still being refined and technical expertise will be essential to reproduce the reported results into everyday practice.

VueBox® for quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver tumors

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) enables quantification of tumor perfusion. VueBox is a platform independent external software using DICOM cine loops which objectively provides various DCE-US parameters of tumor vascularity. This review summaries its use for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of liver tumors. The existing literature provides evidence on the successful application of Vuebox based DCE-US for characterization and differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions, as well as on its use for monitoring of local ablative therapies and of modern systemic treatment in oncology.

Intraoperative lesion characterization after focused ultrasound thalamotomy

OBJECTIVE Outcomes after focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) for essential tremor remain heterogeneous, despite therapeutic promise. Clinical outcomes are directly related to the volume and location of the therapeutic lesions, consistent with CNS ablative therapies. Recent data demonstrate that postoperative diffusion MRI, specifically the quantification of intracellular diffusion by restricted diffusion imaging (RDI), can accurately characterize focused ultrasound lesions. However, it is unclear whether RDI can reliably detect focused ultrasound lesions intraoperatively (i.e., within a few minutes of lesioning) and whether the intraoperative lesions predict delayed clinical outcomes. METHODS An intraoperative imaging protocol was implemented that included RDI and T2-weighted imaging in addition to intraoperative MR thermography. Lesion characteristics were defined with each sequence and then compared. An imaging-outcomes analysis was performed to determine lesion characteristics associated with delayed clinical outcomes. RESULTS Intraoperative RDI accurately identified the volume and location of focused ultrasound lesions. Intraoperative T2-weighted imaging underestimated the lesion volume but accurately identified the location. Intraoperative RDI revealed that lesions of the ventral border of the ventral intermediate nucleus were significantly associated with postoperative tremor improvement. In contrast, the lesions extending into the inferolateral white matter were associated with postoperative ataxia. CONCLUSIONS These data support the acquisition of intraoperative RDI to characterize focused ultrasound lesions. Future research should test the histological correlates of intraoperative RDI and test whether it can be developed as feedback to optimize the current technique of FUSA.

Short-duration dynamic [18F]DCFPyL PET and CT perfusion imaging to localize dominant intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: validation against digital histopathology and comparison to [18F]DCFPyL PET/MR at 120 minutes

Purpose Localized prostate cancer (PCa) in patients is characterized by a dominant focus in the gland (dominant intraprostatic lesion, DIL). Accurate DIL identification may enable more accurate diagnosis and therapy through more precise targeting of biopsy, radiotherapy and focal ablative therapies. The goal of this study is to validate the performance of [18F]DCFPyL PET and CT perfusion (CTP) for detecting and localizing DIL against digital histopathological images. Methods Multi-modality image sets: in vivo T2-weighted (T2w)-MRI, 22-min dynamic [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, CTP, and 2-h post-injection PET/MR were acquired in patients prior to radical prostatectomy. The explanted gland with implanted fiducial markers was imaged with T2w-MRI. All images were co-registered to the pathologist-annotated digital images of whole-mount mid-gland histology sections using fiducial markers and anatomical landmarks. Regions of interest encompassing DIL and non-DIL tissue were drawn on the digital histopathological images and superimposed on PET and CTP parametric maps. Logistic regression with backward elimination of parameters was used to select the most sensitive parameter set to distinguish DIL from non-DIL voxels. Leave-one-patient-out cross-validation was performed to determine diagnostic performance. Results [18F]DCFPyL PET and CTP parametric maps of 15 patients were analyzed. SUVLate and a model combining Ki and k4 of [18F]DCFPyL achieved the most accurate performance distinguishing DIL from non-DIL voxels. Both detection models achieved an AUC of 0.90 and an error rate of < 10%. Compared to digital histopathology, the detected DILs had a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.8 for the Ki and k4 model and 0.7 for SUVLate. Conclusions We have validated using co-registered digital histopathological images that parameters from kinetic analysis of 22-min dynamic [18F]DCFPyL PET can accurately localize DILs in PCa for targeting of biopsy, radiotherapy, and focal ablative therapies. Short-duration dynamic [18F]DCFPyL PET was not inferior to SUVLate in this diagnostic task. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04009174 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

1637 Ablative Therapies Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction The optimal management of small renal masses is unclear. Ablative therapies (AT) have been advocated as a potential alternative due to lower complication rates and non-inferior oncological outcomes. We performed a systematic review to compare AT and partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with T1aN0M0 renal masses. Method This review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020199099). A search was performed on Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify studies comparing AT and PN. Different modalities and approaches were analysed as subgroups. Outcomes include cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastatic-free survival (MFS), postoperative complications, and change in renal function. Results From 1,351 identified records, 30 studies incorporating 85,837 patients were included for meta-analysis. Patients receiving AT were found to have significantly worse CSS, OS, RFS when compared to patients receiving PN (p &lt; 0.05). Patients undergoing AT have a non-inferior MFS and significantly fewer overall complications (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.41-1.51, p = 0.48; RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, p = 0.03). Patients undergoing AT have a smaller decline in renal function post-operatively (SMD: 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.50). When limited to studies with propensity score matching, CSS and RFS are no longer significantly different between the two groups (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.67-3.52, p = 0.31, HR: 1.72, 95% CI 0.90-3.28, p = 0.10). Subgroup analyses did not show significant differences between different modalities and approaches of AT in all outcomes. Conclusions AT is potentially non-inferior to PN when managing small renal masses, and more high-quality propensity score-matched studies with long follow-up time are needed to confirm the non-inferiority.

18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET in the Management of Men with Biochemical Failure after Primary Therapy: Initial Clinical Experience of an Academic Cancer Center

Purpose: To describe the initial experience of an academic center using 18F-DCFPyL PET in managing men with recurrent prostate cancer. Materials & Methods: This prospective, single-arm IRB-approved study included men with biochemical failure after primary therapy for prostate cancer and negative/equivocal CT and bone scintigraphy who were candidates for salvage therapy, as determined by a multidisciplinary panel of experts. 18F-DCFPyL PET was assessed for the presence and extent of recurrence: local, oligometastatic (≤4), or extensive. Post-PET management and clinical outcome, including PSA response, was documented. For patients who received PET-directed ablative therapies, response was categorized as “complete” if PSA became undetectable or “favorable” if PSA decreased ≥50%. Results: Forty-seven men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (n = 29), primary radiotherapy (n = 15) or focal tumor ablation (n = 3) were included. PET was positive in (43/47) 91.5%, including local recurrence in (9/47) 19.2%; oligometastatic disease in (16/47) 34%; and extensive metastatic disease in (18/47) 38.3%. PET-directed focal ablative therapies without systemic therapy were given to (13/29) 44.8% of patients without extensive metastases on PET with a mean PSA response of 69% (median, 74.5%; range: 35–100). Favorable biochemical response was observed in (10/13) 76.9% of patients with limited recurrence on PET, and in 23.1% (3/13), there was complete response. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET was positive in >90% of patients with biochemical failure. For those with limited recurrence, PSMA PET-directed local ablative therapies resulted in favorable outcome in more than 3 in 4 patients, and in nearly a quarter of them, there was complete biochemical response.