Array geometry optimization for direction-of-arrival estimation including subarrays and tapering

Author(s):  
Oliver Lange ◽  
Bin Yang
Author(s):  
Veronicah Nyokabi ◽  
Dominic Makaa Kitavi ◽  
Cyrus Gitonga Ngari

Direction-of-Arrival estimation accuracy using arc array geometry is considered in this paper.There is a scanty use of Uniform Arc Array (UAA) in conjunction with Cramer-Rao bound (CRB)for Direction-of-Arrival estimation. This paper proposed to use Uniform Arc Array formed from a considered Uniform Circular Array (UCA) in conjunction with CRB for Direction-of-Arrival estimation. This Uniform Arc Array is obtained by squeezing all sensors on the Uniform Circular Array circumference uniformly onto the Arc Array. Cramer-Rao bounds for the Uniform Arc Array and that of the Uniform Circular Array are derived. Comparison of performance of the Uniform Circular Array and Uniform Arc Array is done. It was observed that Uniform Arc Array has better estimation accuracy as compared to Uniform Circular Array when number of sensors equals four and ve and azimuth angle ranging between $$\frac{\pi}{9}~ and ~\frac{7}{18}\pi~ and~ also ~\frac{10}{9}\pi ~and ~\frac{25}{18}\pi$$. However, UCA and UAA have equal performance when the number of sensors equals three and the azimuth angle ranging between 0 and 2π. UCA has better estimation accuracy as compared to UAA when the number of sensors equals four and ve and the azimuth angle ranging between  $$\frac{\pi}{2} ~and~ \pi ~and ~also~ \frac{3}{2}\pi ~and~ 2\pi$$


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Lange ◽  
B. Yang

Abstract. This paper focuses on the estimation of the direction-of-arrival (DOA) of signals impinging on a sensor array. A novel method of array geometry optimization is presented that improves the DOA estimation performance compared to the standard uniform linear array (ULA) with half wavelength element spacing. Typically, array optimization only affects the beam pattern of a specific steering direction. In this work, the proposed objective function incorporates, on the one hand, a priori knowledge about the signal's DOA in terms of a probability density function. By this means, the array can be adjusted to external conditions. On the other hand, a modified beam pattern expression that is valid for all possible signal directions is taken into account. By controlling the side lobe level and the beam width of this new function, DOA ambiguities, which lead to large DOA estimation errors, can be avoided. In addition, the DOA fine error variance is minimized. Using a globally convergent evolution strategy, the geometry optimization provides array geometries that significantly outperform the standard ULA with respect to DOA estimation performance. To show the quality of the algorithm, four optimum geometries are presented. Their DOA mean squared error is evaluated using the well known deterministic Maximum Likelihood estimator and compared to the standard ULA and theoretical lower bounds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document