Generalized non-hyperbolic approximation for qP-wave relative geometrical spreading in a layered transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 1290-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shibo Xu ◽  
Alexey Stovas
Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1305-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Zhou ◽  
George A. McMechan

An analytical formula for geometrical spreading is derived for a horizontally layered transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI). With this expression, geometrical spreading can be determined using only the anisotropy parameters in the first layer, the traveltime derivatives, and the source‐receiver offset. Explicit, numerically feasible expressions for geometrical spreading are obtained for special cases of transverse isotropy (weak anisotropy and elliptic anisotropy). Geometrical spreading can be calculated for transversly isotropic (TI) media by using picked traveltimes of primary nonhyperbolic P-wave reflections without having to know the actual parameters in the deeper subsurface; no ray tracing is needed. Synthetic examples verify the algorithm and show that it is numerically feasible for calculation of geometrical spreading. For media with a few (4–5) layers, relative errors in the computed geometrical spreading remain less than 0.5% for offset/depth ratios less than 1.0. Errors that change with offset are attributed to inaccuracy in the expression used for nonhyberbolic moveout. Geometrical spreading is most sensitive to errors in NMO velocity, followed by errors in zero‐offset reflection time, followed by errors in anisotropy of the surface layer. New relations between group and phase velocities and between group and phase angles are shown in appendices.


Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. D79-D84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Stovas

The moveout approximations can be used in kinematic modeling, velocity analysis, and time migration. The generalized moveout approximation involves five approximation parameters and has several known approximations as special cases. A method is demonstrated for determining parameters of the generalized nonhyperbolic moveout approximation for qP- and qSV-waves in a homogeneous transversely isotropic medium with vertical symmetry axis (VTI medium). The additional parameters for the generalized approximation are computed from the hyperbolic asymptote at infinite offset. Comparison with a few well-known moveout approximations for higher-order terms in the Taylor series and asymptotic behavior shows that the generalized moveout approximation is superior to other nonhyperbolic approximations. A few numerical examples for qP- and qSV-waves in a VTI medium also indicate that the generalized approximation performs the best.


Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2082-2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Ursin ◽  
Ketil Hokstad

Compensation for geometrical spreading is important in prestack Kirchhoff migration and in amplitude versus offset/amplitude versus angle (AVO/AVA) analysis of seismic data. We present equations for the relative geometrical spreading of reflected and transmitted P‐ and S‐wave in horizontally layered transversely isotropic media with vertical symmetry axis (VTI). We show that relatively simple expressions are obtained when the geometrical spreading is expressed in terms of group velocities. In weakly anisotropic media, we obtain simple expressions also in terms of phase velocities. Also, we derive analytical equations for geometrical spreading based on the nonhyperbolic traveltime formula of Tsvankin and Thomsen, such that the geometrical spreading can be expressed in terms of the parameters used in time processing of seismic data. Comparison with numerical ray tracing demonstrates that the weak anisotropy approximation to geometrical spreading is accurate for P‐waves. It is less accurate for SV‐waves, but has qualitatively the correct form. For P waves, the nonhyperbolic equation for geometrical spreading compares favorably with ray‐tracing results for offset‐depth ratios less than five. For SV‐waves, the analytical approximation is accurate only at small offsets, and breaks down at offset‐depth ratios less than unity. The numerical results are in agreement with the range of validity for the nonhyperbolic traveltime equations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document