scholarly journals The impact of systematic errors on gestational age estimation

2014 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 842-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Jukic
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e000365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malia S Q Murphy ◽  
Steven Hawken ◽  
Katherine M Atkinson ◽  
Jennifer Milburn ◽  
Jesmin Pervin ◽  
...  

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malia SQ Murphy ◽  
Steven Hawken ◽  
Wei Cheng ◽  
Lindsay A Wilson ◽  
Monica Lamoureux ◽  
...  

This study sought to evaluate the performance of metabolic gestational age estimation models developed in Ontario, Canada in infants born in Bangladesh. Cord and heel prick blood spots were collected in Bangladesh and analyzed at a newborn screening facility in Ottawa, Canada. Algorithm-derived estimates of gestational age and preterm birth were compared to ultrasound-validated estimates. 1036 cord blood and 487 heel prick samples were collected from 1069 unique newborns. The majority of samples (93.2% of heel prick and 89.9% of cord blood) were collected from term infants. When applied to heel prick data, algorithms correctly estimated gestational age to within an average deviation of 1 week overall (root mean square error = 1.07 weeks). Metabolic gestational age estimation provides accurate population-level estimates of gestational age in this data set. Models were effective on data obtained from both heel prick and cord blood, the latter being a more feasible option in low-resource settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Biani Saavedra-Avendano ◽  
Raffaela Schiavon ◽  
Patricio Sanhueza ◽  
Ranulfo Rios-Polanco ◽  
Laura Garcia-Martinez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document