scholarly journals Treatment preferences for medication or surgery in patients with deep endometriosis and bowel involvement – A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author(s):  
Jeroen Metzemaekers ◽  
M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle ◽  
Jonathan Sampat ◽  
Mathilde J.G.H. Smeets ◽  
James English ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jeroen Metzemaekers ◽  
M. Elske Akker-van Marle ◽  
Jonathan Sampat ◽  
Mathilde J.G.H. Smeets ◽  
James English ◽  
...  

Objective To study the preferences and risk tolerance of women suffering from deep endometriosis (DE) with bowel involvement when they have to choose between conservative or surgical. Design Labelled Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Setting Dutch academic and non-academic hospitals and online recruitment. Population or Sample A total of 169 patients diagnosed with DE of the bowel. Methods Baseline characteristics and the fear for surgery were collected. Women were asked to rank attributes and choose between hypothetical conservative (medication) or surgical treatment in different choice sets (scenarios). Each choice set offered different levels of all treatment attributes. Data were analysed by using multinomial logistic regression. Main Outcome Measures The following attributes; effect/or risk on pain, fatigue, pregnancy, endometriosis lesions, mood swings, osteoporosis, temporary stoma and permanent intestinal symptoms were used in this DCE. Results In the ranking osteoporosis is the least important attribute, while in the DCE, a lower chance of osteoporosis is one of the most important drivers when choosing a conservative treatment. Women with previous surgery show less fear for surgery compared to women without surgery. The low anterior resection syndrome is almost equally important for patients as the chance of pain reduction. Pain reduction has higher importance than improving fertility chances even in women with a future child wish. Conclusions The risk of suffering from LARS as a result of treatment is almost equally important as the reduction of pain symptoms. Women with previous surgery experience less fear for surgery compared to women without a surgical history.


Rheumatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 1959-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen S. Hazlewood ◽  
Claire Bombardier ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Carter Thorne ◽  
Vivian P. Bykerk ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Pete Smith ◽  
Peter Hellings ◽  
Glenis Scadding ◽  
Richard Harvey ◽  
Simon Carney ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel C. Mühlbacher ◽  
Uwe Junker ◽  
Christin Juhnke ◽  
Edgar Stemmler ◽  
Thomas Kohlmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Baji ◽  
László Gulácsi ◽  
Barbara D. Lovász ◽  
Petra A. Golovics ◽  
Valentin Brodszky ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 369-382
Author(s):  
Birgit Bauer ◽  
Bernd Brockmeier ◽  
Virginia Devonshire ◽  
Arthur Charbonne ◽  
Daniela Wach ◽  
...  

Aim: This discrete choice experiment aimed to assess patients' preferences for treatment attributes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients & methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS completed an online survey assessing treatment preferences. Descriptive statistical analysis and discrete choice hierarchical Bayesian modeling were performed. Results: Across the overall sample (n = 485), dosing regimen, efficacy and safety were equally important. Within the whole sample, and among those diagnosed <10 years ago, intravenous infusion ≤3 times/year was the preferred dosing regimen; among patients diagnosed ≥10 years ago it was preferred equally to oral treatments. Patients were more willing to accept frequent but mild over rare but severe side effects. Conclusion: Several factors influence patient preferences for MS treatments and must be considered in patient-centered care.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1627-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayako Akiyama ◽  
Amir Goren ◽  
Enrique Basurto ◽  
Tetsushi Komori ◽  
Tasuku Harada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document