scholarly journals Space-Time Cluster Analysis to Detect Innovative Clinical Practices: A Case Study of Aripiprazole in the Department of Veterans Affairs

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-235
Author(s):  
Robert B. Penfold ◽  
James F. Burgess ◽  
Austin F. Lee ◽  
Mingfei Li ◽  
Christopher J. Miller ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Makridis ◽  
Seth Hurley ◽  
Mary Klote ◽  
Gil Alterovitz

UNSTRUCTURED There is widespread agreement that, while artificial intelligence offers significant potential benefits for individuals and society at large, there are also serious challenges to overcome with respect to its governance. Recent policymaking has focused on establishing principles for the trustworthy use of AI. Adhering to these principles is especially important to adhere to protect vulnerable groups and ensure their confidence in the technology and its uses. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs as a case study, we focus on three principles of particular interest: (i) designing, developing, acquiring, and using AI where the benefits of use significantly outweigh the risks and the risks are assessed and managed, (ii) ensuring that the application of AI occurs in well-defined domains and are accurate, effective, and fit for intended purposes, and (iii) ensure the operations and outcomes of AI applications are sufficiently interpretable and understandable by all subject matter experts, users, and others. We argue that these principles and applications apply to vulnerable groups more generally and that adherence to them can allow the VA and other organizations to continue modernizing its technology governance, leveraging the gains of AI and managing its risks.


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman E. Youngblood ◽  
Michael Brooks

The Internet is a critical eHealth/eGovernment information source, and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs operates the United States’ largest integrated health care system. This case study used machine-based accessibility testing to assess accessibility for 116 VA Medical Center websites, based on U.S. Section 508 standards and international WCAG 2.0 guidelines. While we found accessibility issues on each website analyzed, problems were generally limited. Notable exceptions included PDF accessibility and fixed-text sizes. The study’s results offer implications for practitioners (accessibility problems likely overlooked and ways to check accessibility) and educators, particularly the need to better integrate accessibility into the curriculum.


2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike R Sather ◽  
Dennis W Raisch ◽  
Clair M Haakenson ◽  
Julia M Buckelew ◽  
John R Feussner

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himalaya Patel ◽  
Teresa M. Damush ◽  
Edward J. Miech ◽  
Nicholas A. Rattray ◽  
Holly A. Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As telemedicine adoption increases, so does the importance of building cohesion among physicians in telemedicine teams. For example, in acute telestroke services, stroke specialists provide rapid virtual stroke assessment and treatment to patients at hospitals without stroke specialty care. In the National Telestroke Program (NTSP) of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, a virtual (distributed) hub of stroke specialists throughout the country provides 24/7 consultations nationwide. We examined how these specialists adapted to distributed teamwork, and we identified cohesion-related factors in program development and support. Methods: We conducted a case study of the stroke specialists employed by the NTSP. Semi-structured, confidential interviews with stroke specialists in the virtual hub were recorded and transcribed. We explored the extent to which these specialists had developed a sense of shared identity and team cohesion, and we identified factors in this development. Using a qualitative approach with constant comparison methods, two researchers coded each interview transcript independently using a shared codebook. We used matrix displays to identify themes, with special attention to team cohesion, communication, trust, and satisfaction. Results: Of 13 specialists with at least 8 months of NTSP practice, 12 completed interviews; 7 had previously practiced in telestroke programs in other healthcare systems. Interviewees reported high levels of trust and team cohesion, sometimes even more with their virtual colleagues than with local colleagues. Factors facilitating perceived team cohesion included a weekly case conference call, a sense of transparency in discussing challenges, engagement in NTSP development tasks, and support from the NTSP leadership. Although lack of in-person contact was associated with lower cohesion, annual in-person NTSP meetings helped mitigate this issue. Despite technical challenges in establishing a new telehealth system within existing national infrastructure, providers reported high levels of satisfaction with the NTSP. Conclusion: A virtual telestroke hub can provide a sense of team cohesion among stroke specialists at a level comparable with a standard co-located practice. Engaging in transparent discussion of challenging cases, reviewing new clinical evidence, and contributing to program improvements may promote cohesion in distributed telemedicine teams.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anju Sahay ◽  
Paul A. Heidenreich ◽  
Brian S Mittman ◽  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin

Abstract Communities of Practice (CoPs) are a promising approach to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to improve care for chronic conditions like heart failure (HF). COPs involve a complex process of acquiring and converting both explicit and tacit knowledge into clinical activities. Formation: In July 2006, a CoP called the Heart Failure Provider Network (HF Network) was established in the United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with the overarching goal of improving the quality of care for HF patients. The CoP has involved a total of 1,341 multidisciplinary and multilevel members at all 144 VA Health Care Systems (sites). Examples of CoP activities include discussions of interventions to decrease hospitalization rates and to empower patients and caregivers for self-management. Goals of the CoP include networking facilitation, information dissemination and exchange, collaboration and implementation of EBPs. Assessment: We conceptualized the assessment (formative evaluation) of the HF Network in terms of its various activities (inputs) and proximal impacts (mediators) at the individual-level, and its distal and ultimate impacts (outcomes) at the site-level leading to an improved culture of implementation of new/improved EBPs at the system-wide level. The HF Network membership grew steadily over the nine years. Most members were practicing clinicians (n = 891, 66.4%), followed by administrators (n = 342, 25.5%), researchers (n = 70, 5.2%), and others (n = 38, 2.8%). Participation was “active” for 70.9% versus “passive” for 29.4% of members. The distribution of active members (clinicians 64.7%, administrators 21.6%) was similar to the distribution of overall membership. Survey respondents perceived the HF Network as useful in terms of its varied activities and resources relevant for patient care. Members, particularly those that consider themselves influential in improving quality of care, noted multiple benefits of membership. These included confirmation of one’s own clinical practices, evidence-based changes to their practice and help in understanding facilitators and barriers in setting up or running HF clinics and other programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document