scholarly journals The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Practice Indeed Makes Perfect

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna Hentschker ◽  
Roman Mennicken
2016 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish I. Patel ◽  
Yuigi Yuminaga ◽  
Albert Bang ◽  
Nathan Lawrentschuk ◽  
Timothy Skyring ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Withington ◽  
Sarah Fowler ◽  
James Armitage ◽  
Jonathan Glass ◽  
William Finch ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
M. Cooper ◽  
J. Scalea ◽  
J. Miller ◽  
C. Alexander ◽  
R. Barth ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Sidakpal S. Panaich ◽  
Nilay Patel ◽  
Kanishk Agnihotri ◽  
Shilpkumar Arora ◽  
Chirag Savani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erik Mayer ◽  
Lord Ara Darzi ◽  
Thanos Athanasiou

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2557-2558
Author(s):  
J. Simon ◽  
R. Gibbs

The need to engender high-quality clinical outcomes for a rare and lethal disease is best served by specialist referral centres with a high patient volume, although the volume–outcome relationship has not been shown specifically for pulmonary hypertension. The link between access to information and successful pulmonary arterial hypertension management is well established. Healthcare professionals report that patients who receive comprehensive guidance at the beginning of treatment have better outcomes. Information is understood to motivate patients to participate in their own care, thereby improving outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document