scholarly journals Consequences of Health Insurance Cost Sharing Among Low‐Income Medicare Beneficiaries: Evidence from Benefit Cliffs in Medicaid and Medicare’s Prescription Drug Subsidy Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (S1) ◽  
pp. 98-99
Author(s):  
E. Roberts ◽  
A. Glynn ◽  
J. Donohue ◽  
J. Michael McWilliams ◽  
W. Gellad ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacie B. Dusetzina ◽  
Nancy L. Keating

Purpose Orally administered anticancer medications are among the fastest growing components of cancer care. These medications are expensive, and cost-sharing requirements for patients can be a barrier to their use. For Medicare beneficiaries, the Affordable Care Act will close the Part D coverage gap (doughnut hole), which will reduce cost sharing from 100% in 2010 to 25% in 2020 for drug spending above $2,960 until the beneficiary reaches $4,700 in out-of-pocket spending. How much these changes will reduce out-of-pocket costs is unclear. Methods We used the Medicare July 2014 Prescription Drug Plan Formulary, Pharmacy Network, and Pricing Information Files from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 1,114 stand-alone and 2,230 Medicare Advantage prescription drug formularies, which represent all formularies in 2014. We identified orally administered anticancer medications and summarized drug costs, cost-sharing designs used by available plans, and the estimated out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries without low-income subsidies who take a single drug before and after the doughnut hole closes. Results Little variation existed in formulary design across plans and products. The average price per month for included products was $10,060 (range, $5,123 to $16,093). In 2010, median beneficiary annual out-of-pocket costs for a typical treatment duration ranged from $6,456 (interquartile range, $6,433 to $6,482) for dabrafenib to $12,160 (interquartile range, $12,102 to $12,262) for sunitinib. With the assumption that prices remain stable, after the doughnut hole closes, beneficiaries will spend approximately $2,550 less. Conclusion Out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries taking orally administered anticancer medications are high and will remain so after the doughnut hole closes. Efforts are needed to improve affordability of high-cost cancer drugs for beneficiaries who need them.


Author(s):  
Katherine A. Desmond ◽  
Thomas H. Rice ◽  
Arleen A. Leibowitz

This article examines whether California Medicare beneficiaries with HIV/AIDS choose Part D prescription drug plans that minimize their expenses. Among beneficiaries without low-income supplementation, we estimate the excess cost, and the insurance policy and beneficiary characteristics responsible, when the lowest cost plan is not chosen. We use a cost calculator developed for this study, and 2010 drug use data on 1453 California Medicare beneficiaries with HIV who were taking antiretroviral medications. Excess spending is defined as the difference between projected total spending (premium and cost sharing) for the beneficiary’s current drug regimen in own plan vs spending for the lowest cost alternative plan. Regression analyses related this excess spending to individual and plan characteristics. We find that beneficiaries pay more for Medicare Part D plans with gap coverage and no deductible. Higher premiums for more extensive coverage exceeded savings in deductible and copayment/coinsurance costs. We conclude that many beneficiaries pay for plan features whose costs exceed their benefits.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Zhou ◽  
Gordon G. Liu ◽  
Yankun Sun ◽  
Sam A. Vortherms

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marika Cabral ◽  
Neale Mahoney

Most health insurance uses cost-sharing to reduce excess utilization. Supplemental insurance can blunt the impact of this cost-sharing, increasing utilization and exerting a negative externality on the primary insurer. This paper estimates the effect of private Medigap supplemental insurance on public Medicare spending using Medigap premium discontinuities in local medical markets that span state boundaries. Using administrative data on the universe of Medicare beneficiaries, we estimate that Medigap increases an individual’s Medicare spending by 22.2 percent. We calculate that a 15 percent tax on Medigap premiums generates savings of $12.9 billion annually with a standard error of $4.9 billion. (JEL G22, H24, H51, I13, J14)


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1229-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Von Korff ◽  
Malia Oliver ◽  
Paul Fishman ◽  
John Burbank

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document