Prospective observational study of predicted usage of intravenous cannulas inserted in a tertiary paediatric emergency department

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Hollaway ◽  
Carsten Broeze ◽  
Meredith L Borland
BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 329 (7478) ◽  
pp. 1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran Kozer ◽  
Winnie Seto ◽  
Zulfikaral Verjee ◽  
Chris Parshuram ◽  
Sohail Khattak ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e001267
Author(s):  
Manon Jaboyedoff ◽  
Carl Starvaggi ◽  
Joan-Carles Suris ◽  
Claudia E Kuehni ◽  
Mario Gehri ◽  
...  

BackgroundLow-acuity paediatric emergency department (PED) visits are common in high-income countries and are an increasing burden for the healthcare system and quality of care. Little is known about low-acuity PED visits in Switzerland. This study shows frequency and characteristics of such visits in two large PEDs in German-speaking and French-speaking regions of Switzerland.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study in the PED of two Swiss tertiary care hospitals, Bern and Lausanne. We extracted standardised administrative and medical data from the clinic information system for all PED visits of children aged 0–17 years from January to December 2018. We defined low-acuity visits as those meeting all of the following criteria: (1) triage category 4 or 5 on the Australasian Triage Scale, (2) no imaging or laboratory test performed and (3) discharge home. We used a binary multiple logistic regression model to identify factors associated with low-acuity visits.ResultsWe analysed 53 089 PED visits. The proportion of low-acuity visits was 54% (95% CI 53% to 54%, 28 556 visits). Low-acuity visits were associated with age younger than 5 years (adjusted OR, aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.81 to 1.94), living within a 5 km radius of PED (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.32), and after hour presentations (weekends: aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, nights: aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.36).ConclusionLow-acuity visits are frequent in our PEDs and associated with younger age and convenience factors (proximity of residency and after hour presentation), pointing to a high demand for paediatric urgent care services in Switzerland not currently covered by the primary healthcare system.


2020 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-209891
Author(s):  
Leopold Simma ◽  
Florian Bauder ◽  
Thomas Schmitt-Mechelke

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of point-of-care electroencephalogram (pocEEG) in the paediatric emergency department (ED) for children presenting with acute non-traumatic central nervous system (CNS) disorders.MethodsRetrospective observational study of prospectively collected data in paediatric patients (0–16 years) with acute non-traumatic CNS-disorders presenting between April 2014 and February 2017 to a single paediatric ED in Switzerland.The 2-channel EEG was applied to all patients presenting with acute seizures or impaired consciousness to the ED. For a pocEEG, scalp surface electrodes are applied in five locations, thus allowing registration of fronto-temporal bilateral cortical activity. Neurology consultants assisted with interpretation of readings. EEG findings and clinical characteristics were collected. Feasibility and usefulness were rated via Likert scale.Results36 patients with acute seizures or altered mental status were analysed. Age range was 9 months to 15 years, median age of 34 months. 21 of 36 (58%) patients arrived out of hours. Application of electrodes was rated as ‘easy’ in 28 (77.8%) patients and rated as ‘difficult’ in 8 (22.2%). The utility of the EEG was rated by physicians as ‘very useful/diagnostic’ in 13 cases (36%), ‘useful’ in 21 cases (58%), ‘not useful’ in two cases (8%). None were rated ‘negative.’ConclusionUptake of pocEEG introduction has been very encouraging. Provider ratings were overwhelmingly positive. Recognition of non-convulsive status epilepticus was improved and pocEEG facilitated more targeted interventions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juen-Li Ding ◽  
David McD Taylor ◽  
Marina Lee ◽  
Olivia G Johnson ◽  
Aadith Ashok ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document