Biotransformation of green tea ( Camellia sinensis ) by wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-315
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Jingcan Sun ◽  
Benjamin Lassabliere ◽  
Bin Yu ◽  
Shao Quan Liu
2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 2432-2439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Guillaume ◽  
Pierre Delobel ◽  
Jean-Marie Sablayrolles ◽  
Bruno Blondin

ABSTRACT Fructose utilization by wine yeasts is critically important for the maintenance of a high fermentation rate at the end of alcoholic fermentation. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast able to ferment grape must sugars to dryness was found to have a high fructose utilization capacity. We investigated the molecular basis of this enhanced fructose utilization capacity by studying the properties of several hexose transporter (HXT) genes. We found that this wine yeast harbored a mutated HXT3 allele. A functional analysis of this mutated allele was performed by examining expression in an hxt1-7Δ strain. Expression of the mutated allele alone was found to be sufficient for producing an increase in fructose utilization during fermentation similar to that observed in the commercial wine yeast. This work provides the first demonstration that the pattern of fructose utilization during wine fermentation can be altered by expression of a mutated hexose transporter in a wine yeast. We also found that the glycolytic flux could be increased by overexpression of the mutant transporter gene, with no effect on fructose utilization. Our data demonstrate that the Hxt3 hexose transporter plays a key role in determining the glucose/fructose utilization ratio during fermentation.


Author(s):  
A. Shitova ◽  
I. Anisimova

The activity of wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae used for black currant, cherry and cranberry fermentation was studied using cell area dynamics calculated by computer cytomorphometry method.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Burattini ◽  
M. Cavagna ◽  
R. Dell’Anna ◽  
F. Malvezzi Campeggi ◽  
F. Monti ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong D Hang ◽  
Edward E Woodams

An improved process with commercial wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Montrachet was developed for co-production of betacyanine (a natural red beet pigment) and red beet eau-de-vie from the juice of red beet roots (Beta vulgaris). Red beet wines contained more than 55 g/L ethanol and approximately 0.95 g/L betacyanine. The samples of red beet eau-de-vie prepared by distillation of red beet wines had 180 g/L ethanol and the stillages contained nearly 2.5 g/L betacyanine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Huma Bokkhim ◽  
Praksha Neupane ◽  
Smita Gurung ◽  
Rojeena Shrestha

A study was carried out on encapsulation of wine yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its use in wine making compared to free yeast. Rehydrated active dry yeast was encapsulated in a 2% sodium alginate solution, cross linked with different molar concentration of CaCl2 solution (0.1, 0.2, 0.3,0.4 and 0.5M) for 30 minutes. The molar concentration with minimum cell leakage (0.2M) was used for yeast encapsulation. Colony count (CFU/ml) was analyzed for both free yeast (FY) and encapsulated yeast (EY) so as to equilibrate the rate of yeast pitching in wine fermentation. Physico-chemical properties; total soluble solids (T.S.S.), acidity and pH of red and white grapes were analyzed and were found to be 16.4±0.10oBx, 0.38±0.02% and 3.90±0.02 for white grapes and 19±0.15oBx, 0.64±0.01% and 3.1±0.10 for red grapes. During the fermentation process in both wines, a gradual reduction in T.S.S. was noted while an alternate of increase and decrease trend in acidity was noted which finally stabilized after 12 days. The final T.S.S. of wines was not significantly different for yeast types but higher values were noted for red wine (FY, 7.11±0.26 & EY, 7.33±0.19) than for white wine (FY, 6.1±0.10 & EY, 6.2±0.10). Similar trend was noted for final acidity of red wine (FY, 0.83±0.01 & EY, 0.84±0.02%). Though, no significant effect of yeast type on alcohol production was noted, the average alcohol content of red (FY, 13.22±0.26% & EY, 13.72±0.44%) and white (FY, 9.21±0.21% & EY, 9.64±0.38%) wine were found to be significantly different. However, wine prepared from EY was less turbid (Red wine, 95 NTU & White wine, 140 NTU) and had higher clarity (L*) than wine from FY. So, from this study it was concluded that encapsulating wine yeast does not affect its fermenting capability but will aid in production of less turbid wine which will definitely simplify the filtration process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document