A qualitative evaluation of a mentoring program for Aboriginal health workers and allied health professionals

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Browne ◽  
Sharon Thorpe ◽  
Noeleen Tunny ◽  
Karen Adams ◽  
Claire Palermo
2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Higgins ◽  
Barbara Murphy ◽  
Marian Worcester ◽  
Angela Daffey

To support self-management, health professionals need to adopt a client-centred approach and learn to deliver evidence-based behaviour change interventions. This paper reports on the evaluation of 1- and 2-day training programs developed to improve health professionals’ capacity to support chronic disease self-management (CDSM). The 321 participants attended one of eighteen supporting CDSM courses held in urban and rural settings. Participants included nurses, allied health professionals, Aboriginal health workers and general practitioners. Data were collected at three time points: before participation; immediately after the training; and, for a sub-sample of 37 participants, 2 months after the training. Results revealed a significant and sustained increase in CDSM self-efficacy following training regardless of participants’ gender, age or qualifications. A thematic analysis of the responses concerning intended practice revealed four main areas of intended practice change, namely: use behavioural strategies; improve communication with clients; adopt a client-centred approach; and improve goal setting. The number of practice changes at 2 months reported by a sub-sample of participants ranged from 1 to 20 with a mean of 14 (s.d. = 4). The three most common areas of practice change point to the adoption by health professionals of a collaborative approach with chronic disease patients. Lack of staff trained in CDSM was seen as a major barrier to practice change, with lack of support and finance also named as barriers to practice change. Participants identified that increased training, support and awareness of the principles of supporting CDSM would help to overcome barriers to practice change. These results indicate a readiness among health professionals to adopt a more collaborative approach given the skills and the tools to put this approach into practice.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Saxby ◽  
Jill Wilson ◽  
Peter Newcombe

Objective Clinical supervision is widely recognised as a mechanism for providing professional support, professional development and clinical governance for healthcare workers. There have been limited studies about the effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health and minimal studies conducted within the Australian health context. The aim of the present study was to identify whether clinical supervision was perceived to be effective by allied health professionals and to identify components that contributed to effectiveness. Participants completed an anonymous online questionnaire, administered through the health service’s intranet. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with community allied health workers (n = 82) 8 months after implementation of structured clinical supervision. Demographic data (age, gender), work-related history (profession employment level, years of experience), and supervision practice (number and length of supervision sessions) were collected through an online survey. The outcome measure, clinical supervision effectiveness, was operationalised using the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale-26 (MCSS-26©). Data were analysed with Pearson correlation (r) and independent sample t-tests (t) with significance set at 0.05 (ie the probability of significant difference set at P < 0.05). Results The length of the supervision sessions (rs ≥0.44), the number of sessions (rs ≥ 0.35) and the total period supervision had been received (rs ≥ 0.42) were all significantly positively correlated with the MCSS-26© domains of clinical supervision effectiveness. Three individual variables, namely ‘receiving clinical supervision’, ‘having some choice in the allocation of clinical supervisor’ and ‘having a completed clinical supervision agreement’, were also significantly associated with higher total MCSS-26© scores (Ps < 0.014). Conclusion The results of the study demonstrate that when clinical supervision uses best practice principles, it can provide professional support for allied health workers, even during times of rapid organisational change. What is known about the topic? The provision of clinical supervision for allied health staff is being increasingly adopted within the Australian health context. However, current approaches to clinical supervision for allied health are fragmented and poorly coordinated. There have been limited clinical supervision studies undertaken in Australian allied health populations, and little is known about the evidence for outcomes in this cohort. What does this paper add? The findings of the present study indicate that clinical supervision, when based on best practice principles, can provide professional support and guidance to allied health workers, even when staff are experiencing significant change in the workplace. The article describes specific elements of the clinical supervision infrastructure that appear to be critical for effective professional support outcomes. What are the implications for practitioners? Effective clinical supervision can provide professional support to the allied health workforce. Healthcare organisations can facilitate effective clinical supervision delivery by ensuring that evidence-based principles are embedded in the infrastructure of the clinical supervision practice.


Author(s):  
Rosalie Coppin ◽  
Greg Fisher

Purpose – Mentoring is widely used in the health sector, particularly for early career professionals in the public health system. However, many allied health professionals are employed in private practice and rely on their professional association to provide mentoring support and training. This mentoring context is under-researched. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A purposeful sample of 15 allied health professionals were interviewed using semi-structured interviews that were then analyzed using template analysis. Findings – The many-to-many group mentoring program delivered valuable knowledge, diagnostic skills and networking opportunities but did not provide inclusion, role modeling or psychosocial support to participants. Also identified were structural and operational issues including; the role of the coordinator in addressing contribution reluctance and participant confidence, confidentiality issues, lack of mentor training and overall organization of the program. Practical implications – Group mentoring is a valuable method of delivery for professional associations. The many-to-many group mentoring model is beneficial in a situation where the availability of mentors is limited. Further, the importance of having a dedicated program coordinator and a skilled facilitator is emphasized. Originality/value – This research contributes to the limited literature on many-to-many group mentoring by reviewing the effectiveness of an existing many-to-many group mentoring program for allied health professionals delivered by a professional association.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Colette Miller ◽  
Julie Cook ◽  
Josephine Mary Evelyn Gibson ◽  
Caroline Leigh Watkins ◽  
Stephanie P Jones

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S8
Author(s):  
Lauren Ashley Rousseau ◽  
Nicole M. Bourque ◽  
Tiffany Andrade ◽  
Megan E.B. Antonellis ◽  
Patrice Hoskins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Margaret Evans

Abstract Background Healthcare aims to promote good health and yet demonstrably contributes to climate change, which is purported to be ‘the biggest global health threat of the 21st century’. This is happening now, with healthcare as an industry representing 4.4% of global carbon dioxide emissions. Main body Climate change promotes health deficits from many angles; however, primarily it is the use of fossil fuels which increases atmospheric carbon dioxide (also nitrous oxide, and methane). These greenhouse gases prevent the earth from cooling, resulting in the higher temperatures and rising sea levels, which then cause ‘wild weather’ patterns, including floods, storms, and droughts. Particular vulnerability is afforded to those already health compromised (older people, pregnant women, children, wider health co-morbidities) as well as populations closer to equatorial zones, which encompasses many low-and-middle-income-countries. The paradox here, is that poorer nations by spending less on healthcare, have lower carbon emissions from health-related activity, and yet will suffer most from global warming effects, with scant resources to off-set the increasing health care needs. Global recognition has forged the Paris agreement, the United Nations sustainable developments goals, and the World Health Organisation climate change action plan. It is agreed that most healthcare impact comes from consumption of energy and resources, and the production of greenhouse gases into the environment. Many professional associations of medicine and allied health professionals are advocating for their members to lead on environmental sustainability; the Australian Podiatry Association is incorporating climate change into its strategic direction. Conclusion Podiatrists, as allied health professionals, have wide community engagement, and hence, can model positive environmental practices, which may be effective in changing wider community behaviours, as occurred last century when doctors stopped smoking. As foot health consumers, our patients are increasingly likely to expect more sustainable practices and products, including ‘green footwear’ options. Green Podiatry, as a part of sustainable healthcare, directs us to be responsible energy and product consumers, and reduce our workplace emissions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document