Abstract
Thin-section computed tomography (TSCT) imaging biomarkers are uncertain to distinguish progressive adenocarcinoma from benign lesions in pGGNs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of TSCT characteristics for differentiating among transient (TRA) lesions, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) presenting as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). Between January 2016 and January 2018, 255 pGGNs, including 64 TRA, 22 AAH, 37 AIS, 108 MIA and 24 IAC cases, were reviewed on TSCT images. Differences in TSCT characteristics were compared among these five subtypes of pGGNs. Logistic analysis was performed to identify significant factors for predicting MIA and IAC. Progressive pGGNs were more likely to be round or oval in shape, with clear margins, air bronchograms, vascular and pleural changes, creep growth, and bubble-like lucency than were non-progressive pGGNs. The optimal cut-off values of the maximum diameter for differentiating non-progressive from progressive pGGNs and IAC from non-IAC were 6.5 mm and 11.5 mm, respectively. For the prediction of IAC vs. non-IAC and non-progressive vs. progressive adenocarcinoma, the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves were 0.865 and 0.783 for maximum diameter and 0.784 and 0.722 for maximum CT attenuation, respectively. The optimal cut-off values of maximum CT attenuation were −532 HU and −574 HU for differentiating non-progressive from progressive pGGNs and IAC from non-IAC, respectively. Maximum diameter, maximum attenuation and morphological characteristics could help distinguish TRA lesions from MIA and IAC but not from AAH. So, CT morphologic characteristics, diameter and attenuation parameters are useful for differentiating among pGGNs of different subtypes.
Coexistence of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma: Gene mutation analysis
