scholarly journals Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1346-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward R. Melnick ◽  
Marc A. Probst ◽  
Elizabeth Schoenfeld ◽  
Sean P. Collins ◽  
Maggie Breslin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Shared Decision

Shared Decision Making to Improve the Emergency Care of Older Adults: A Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1386-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresita M. Hogan ◽  
Natalie L. Richmond ◽  
Christopher R. Carpenter ◽  
Kevin Biese ◽  
Ula Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals Health Policy and Shared Decision Making in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1380-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon C. Maughan ◽  
Zachary F. Meisel ◽  
Arjun K. Venkatesh ◽  
Michelle P. Lin ◽  
Warren M. Perry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals Dissemination and Implementation of Shared Decision Making Into Clinical Practice: A Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1368-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemal K. Kanzaria ◽  
Juanita Booker-Vaughns ◽  
Kaoru Itakura ◽  
Kabir Yadav ◽  
Bryan G. Kane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals Envisioning Shared Decision Making: A Reflection for the Next Decade

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 238146832096378
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Barton ◽  
Marleen Kunneman ◽  
Ian Hargraves ◽  
Annie LeBlanc ◽  
Juan P. Brito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
International Group ◽  
Human Situation ◽  
The Future ◽  
Substantial Investment

Despite the evolving evidence in favor of shared decision making (SDM) and of decades-long calls for its adoption, SDM remains uncommon in routine care. Reflecting on this lack of progress, we sought to reimagine the future of SDM and the path to take us there. In late 2017, a multidisciplinary and international group of six researchers were challenged by a senior SDM scholar to envision the future and, based on a provocatively critical view of the present, to write letters to themselves from the year 2028. Letters were exchanged and discussed electronically. The group then met in person to discuss the letters. Since the letters painted a dystopian picture, they triggered questions about the nature of SDM, who should benefit from SDM, how to measure its contribution to care, and what new ways can be invented to design and test interventions to implement SDM in routine care. Through contrasting the purposefully generated dystopias with an ideal future for SDM, we generated reflections on a research agenda for SDM. These reflections hinged on recognizing SDM’s contributing to care, that is, as a way to advance the problematic human situation of patients. These focused on three distinct yet complimentary contributors to SDM: 1) the process of making decisions, 2) humanistic communication, and 3) fit-to-care of the resulting decision. The group then concluded that to move SDM from envisioned to routine practice, and to ensure it reaches all, particularly persons rendered vulnerable by current forms of health care, a substantial investment in implementation research is necessary. Perhaps the discussion of these reflections can contribute to a path forward that will improve the likelihood of the future we dream for SDM.

The Role of Education in the Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Emergency Medicine: A Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1362-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther H. Chen ◽  
Hemal K. Kanzaria ◽  
Kaoru Itakura ◽  
Juanita Booker-Vaughns ◽  
Kabir Yadav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Shared Decision

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document