scholarly journals The impact of respiratory protective equipment on difficult airway management: a randomised, crossover, simulation study

Anaesthesia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1301-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schumacher ◽  
J. Arlidge ◽  
D. Dudley ◽  
M. Sicinski ◽  
I. Ahmad
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Coyle ◽  
Daphne Martin ◽  
Karen McCutcheon

The aim of this narrative literature review was to explore the impact of interprofessional simulation-based team training on difficult airway management. The Fourth National Audit Project of The Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Difficult Airway Society identified recurrent deficits in practice that included delayed recognition of critical events, inadequate provision of appropriately trained staff and poor collaboration and communication strategies between teams. Computerised databases were assessed to enable data collection, and a narrative literature review and synthesis of eight quantitative studies were performed. Four core themes were identified: debriefing, measures of assessment and evaluation, non-technical skills and patient safety, and patient outcomes. There are many benefits to be gained from interprofessional simulation training as a method of teaching high-risk and infrequent clinical airway emergencies. The practised response to emergency algorithms is crucial and plays a vital role in the reduction of errors and adverse patient outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 999-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Hubert ◽  
Antoine Duwat ◽  
Romain Deransy ◽  
Yazine Mahjoub ◽  
Hervé Dupont

Abstract Background: The effectiveness of simulation is rarely evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a short training course on the ability of anesthesiology residents to comply with current difficult airway management guidelines. Methods: Twenty-seven third-year anesthesiology residents were assessed on a simulator in a “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” scenario before the training (the pretest) and then randomly 3, 6, or 12 months after training (the posttest). The scenario was built so that the resident was prompted to perform a cricothyrotomy. Compliance with airway management guidelines and the cricothyrotomy’s duration and technical quality were assessed as a checklist score [0 to 10] and a global rating scale [7 to 35]. Results: After training, all 27 residents (100%) complied with the airway management guidelines, compared with 17 (63%) in the pretest (P < 0.005). In the pretest and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month posttests, the median [range] duration of cricothyrotomy was respectively 117 s [70 to 184], 69 s [43 to 97], 52 s [43 to 76], and 62 s [43 to 74] (P < 0.0001 vs. in the pretest), the median [range] checklist score was 3 [0 to 7], 10 [8 to 10], 9 [6 to 10], and 9 [4 to 10] (P < 0.0001 vs. in the pretest) and the median [range] global rating scale was 12 [7 to 22], 30 [20 to 35], 33 [23 to 35], and 31 [18 to 33] (P < 0.0001 vs. in the pretest). There were no significant differences between performance levels achieved in the 3-, 6-, and 12-month posttests. Conclusion: The training session significantly improved the residents’ compliance with guidelines and their performance of cricothyrotomy.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982098656
Author(s):  
Soham Roy ◽  
John D. Cramer ◽  
Carol Bier-Laning ◽  
Patrick A. Palmieri ◽  
Christopher H. Rassekh ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 619-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ezri ◽  
S. Konichezky ◽  
D. Geva ◽  
R. D. Warters ◽  
P. Szmuk ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. e109
Author(s):  
Tariq Syed ◽  
Jeffery Cerny ◽  
Alicia Kowalski ◽  
Spencer Kee ◽  
Elizabeth Rebello ◽  
...  

Anaesthesia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 1024-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Greenland ◽  
M. J. Edwards ◽  
L. Beckmann ◽  
N. Hutton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document