Ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall

Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Q. Tighe
Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 1129-1133
Author(s):  
A. H. Kumar ◽  
E. Sultan ◽  
E. R. Mariano

Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (S1) ◽  
pp. 110-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Chin ◽  
B. Versyck ◽  
A. Pawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selene Ranocchia ◽  
Paolo Scimia ◽  
Carolina Giordano ◽  
Vinicio Danzi ◽  
Elena Bignami

2019 ◽  
pp. rapm-2019-100745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo D Franco ◽  
Konstantin Inozemtsev

The popularity of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks has impacted the practice of regional anesthesia in profound ways, improving some techniques and introducing new ones. Some of these new nerve blocks are based on the concept of fascial plane blocks, in which the local anesthetic is injected into a plane instead of around a specific nerve. Pectoralis muscles (PECS) and serratus blocks, most commonly used for post op analgesia after breast surgery, are good examples. Among the nerves targeted by PECS/serratus blocks are different branches of the brachial plexus that traditionally have been considered purely motor nerves. This unsubstantiated claim is a departure from accepted anatomical knowledge and challenges our understanding of the sensory innervation of the chest wall. The objective of this Daring Discourse is to look beyond the ability of PECS/serratus blocks to provide analgesia/anesthesia of the chest wall, to concentrate instead on understanding the mechanism of action of these blocks and, in the process, test the veracity of the claim. After a comprehensive review of the evidence we have concluded that (1) the traditional model of sensory innervation of the chest wall, which derives from the lateral branches of the upper intercostal nerves and does not include branches of the brachial plexus, is correct. (2) PECS/serratus blocks share the same mechanism of action, blocking the lateral branches of the upper intercostal nerves, and so their varied success is tied to their ability to reach them. This common mechanism agrees with the traditional innervation model. (3) A common mechanism of action supports the consolidation of PECS/serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block with a point of injection closer to the effector site. In a nod to transversus abdominus plane block, the original inspiration for PECS blocks, we propose naming this modified block, the serratus anterior plane block.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nantthasorn Zinbonyahgoon ◽  
Panya Luksanapruksa ◽  
Sitha Piyaselakul ◽  
Pawinee Pangthipampai ◽  
Suphalerk Lohasammakul ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The ultrasound-guided proximal intercostal block (PICB) is performed at the proximal intercostal space (ICS) between the internal intercostal membrane (IIM) and the endothoracic fascia/parietal pleura (EFPP) complex. Injectate spread may follow several routes and allow for multilevel trunk analgesia. The goal of this study was to examine the anatomical spread of large-volume PICB injections and its relevance to breast surgery analgesia. Methods: Fifteen two-level PICBs were performed in ten soft-embalmed cadavers. Radiographic contrast mixed with methylene blue was injected at the 2nd(15ml) and 4th(25ml) ICS, respectively. Fluoroscopy and dissection were performed to examine the injectate spread. Additionally, the medical records of 12 patients who had PICB for breast surgery were reviewed for documented dermatomal levels of clinical hypoesthesia. The records of twelve matched patients who had the same operations without PICB were reviewed to compare analgesia and opioid consumption. Results: Median contrast/dye spread was 4(2-8) and 3(2-5) vertebral segments by fluoroscopy and dissection respectively. Dissection revealed injectate spread to the adjacent paravertebral space, T3 (60%) and T5 (27%), and cranio-caudal spread along the endothoracic fascia (80%). Clinically, the median documented area of hypoesthesia was 5(4-7) dermatomes with 100% and 92% of the injections covering adjacent T3 and T5 dermatomes, respectively. The patients with PICB had significantly lower perioperative opioid consumption and trend towards lower pain scores. Conclusions: In this anatomical study, PICB at the 2nd and 4th ICS produced lateral spread along the corresponding intercostal space, medial spread to the adjacent paravertebral/epidural space and cranio-caudal spread along the endothoracic fascial plane. Clinically, combined PICBs at the same levels resulted in consistent segmental chest wall analgesia and reduction in perioperative opioid consumption after breast surgery. The incomplete overlap between paravertebral spread in the anatomical study and area of hypoesthesia in our clinical findings, suggests that additional non-paravertebral routes of injectate distribution, such as the endothoracic fascial plane, may play important clinical role in the multi-level coverage provided by this block technique. Keywords: Nerve block, paravertebral space, intercostal space, intercostal block, breast surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 187-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Jinn Chin ◽  
Amit Pawa ◽  
Mauricio Forero ◽  
Sanjib Adhikary

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document