The Effect of Capitalising Operating Leases On Charities

Author(s):  
Nafiz Fahad ◽  
Tom Scott
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 969-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gyung H. Paik ◽  
Joyce A. van der Laan Smith ◽  
Brandon Byunghwan Lee ◽  
Sung Wook Yoon

SYNOPSIS Proposed changes by the FASB and the IASB to lease accounting standards will substantially change the accounting for operating leases by requiring the capitalization of future lease payments. We consider the impact of these changes on firms' debt covenants by examining the frequency of income-statement- versus balance-sheet-based accounting ratios in debt covenants of firms in high and low Off Balance Sheet (OBS) lease industries. Based on debt contracts from the 1996–2009 period, our results provide evidence that lenders focus on balance sheet (income statement) ratios in designing debt covenants for borrowers in low (high) OBS lease industries. Further, the use of balance-sheet- (income-statement-) based covenants falls (rises) faster in high OBS lease industries than in low OBS lease industries as the use of OBS leasing increases. This evidence indicates that OBS operating leases influence lenders' use of accounting information in covenants, suggesting that creditors consider the impact of OBS leases when structuring debt agreements. These results also suggest that the proposed capitalization of OBS leases may not result in firms violating loan covenants but will make the balance sheet a more complete source of information for debt contracting by removing the need for constructive capitalization of OBS leases.


2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1179-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Bratten ◽  
Preeti Choudhary ◽  
Katherine Schipper

ABSTRACT We provide evidence that disclosed items are not processed differently from recognized items when the disclosures are salient, not based on management estimates, and amenable to simple techniques for imputing as-if recognized amounts. For a sample of firms with both capital and operating leases, we find that as-if recognized amounts for leases are generally reliable and that both recognized lease obligations and disclosed lease obligations are associated with proxies for costs of debt and equity. The magnitudes of these associations are not statistically different across accounting treatments, suggesting that market participants impound as-if recognized operating lease obligations and recognized capital lease obligations similarly into costs of capital. Conditioning on the reliability of as-if recognized operating lease obligations, we find a difference in the association between recognized versus as-if recognized lease obligations and proxies for the costs of debt and equity when the operating lease disclosures are less reliable. Data Availability: Data used are available from public sources identified in the study.


Author(s):  
Benjamin Y. Tai

The current study is undertaken to investigate the potential problems resulting from the proposed adoption of a new accounting standard concerning mandatory capitalization of all lease contracts.  In 2010, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a joint exposure draft (ED2010/9) on accounting for leases.  Under the new standard, lessees are required to capitalize all lease contracts as assets and liabilities.  The distinction between operating leases and capital (finance) leases will no longer exist.  The long-standing off-balance sheet treatment of operating leases will be prohibited.  After the adoption of the proposed standard, companies with significant operating leases are likely to experience an increase in assets, increase in liabilities, and decrease in equity, resulting in the deterioration of their return-on- assets and debt-to-equity ratios.  This research examines two large fast-food restaurant chains based in Hong Kong; and through constructive capitalization, demonstrates how the companies’ key financial ratios are negatively impacted if the new standard is implemented.  The results indicate that both the return-on-assets and debt-to-equity ratios of the two companies, under various discount rates assumptions, suffer serious deterioration when their operating leases are capitalized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 09029
Author(s):  
Tatiana Melekhina ◽  
Elena Sedova ◽  
Irina Karpova

In modern conditions, Russian accounting is increasingly oriented to international standards. Accounting for leasing relations is also subject to changes that are associated with the transition of Russian accounting to international financial reporting standards (IFRS). In 2016, a new standard was approved for accounting for leases in public sector organizations - the SPS “Leases” (entered into force on January 1, 2018). For other organizations, on October 16, 2018, FAS 25 “Lease accounting” was approved. This standard introduces the type of asset - the right to lease, which represents a new format for accounting methodological documents. The purpose of the study is to consider the features of the application of FAS 25 “Lease accounting” based on the new IFRS 16 “Leases” in accounting for operating leases of Russian organizations. The authors consider the lease relations of economic entities of the Russian economy using the example of pharmacy organizations, in particular, the main aspects of FAS 25, the procedure for accounting for operating leases from the perspective of a lessee and lessor, features of accounting for sublease, leaseback, lease on special terms, as well as disclosure of lease information in accounting (financial) statements. The methodological basis of the study consisted of elements of the accounting method (system of accounts, double entry book-keeping, reporting) and tools of economic analysis (method of comparison, absolute and relative values, tabular and graphical representations of data, coefficient method). As a result of the study, an operating lease accounting mechanism was proposed, which reflects the specifics of pharmacy organizations.


1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Copeland ◽  
J. Fred Weston
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nuria Arimany ◽  
M. Angels Fitó ◽  
Soledad Moya ◽  
Neus Orgaz
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Biondi ◽  
Robert J. Bloomfield ◽  
Jonathan C. Glover ◽  
Karim Jamal ◽  
James A. Ohlson ◽  
...  

SYNOPSIS The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently issued a joint exposure draft on accounting for leases. This exposure draft seeks to shift lease accounting from an “ownership” model to a “right-of-use” model. Under the current ownership model, leases can be reported on balance sheet (finance leases) if certain tests are met, or off balance sheet (operating leases) if those tests are not met. The new model seeks to report all leases on the balance sheet based on the present value of lease obligations without any bright line tests, and no sharp on or off the balance sheet classifications. We are sympathetic to the standard setters' concern that the current lease standard is being manipulated improperly by managers, resulting in large amounts of debt being reported off balance sheet. We provide a discussion of current lease accounting and the proposed exposure draft. We also comment on five key issues covered by the exposure draft: the definition of a lease, the initial measurement and eventual reassessment at fair values, the accounting for lessors, the impact of lease accounting on recognition and income measurement, and classification of lease accounting elements and their impact on accounting ratios. JEL Classifications: M40.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document