scholarly journals Solid organ transplant in individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

2015 ◽  
Vol 174 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Kamel A. Gharaibeh ◽  
Nelson Leung ◽  
Ferdinando G. Cosio ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Gibson ◽  
Eric A. Engels ◽  
Christina A. Clarke ◽  
Ruth M. Pfeiffer ◽  
Charles F. Lynch ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1875-1875
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Ford ◽  
Alexandra E. Kovach ◽  
John P. Greer ◽  
David S. Morgan ◽  
Mahsa Sharifi Talbott ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Immunotherapy with rituximab alone or in combination with sequential chemotherapy such as CHOP, in addition to a reduction in immunosuppression (IST), has been shown to be effective in achieving long-term, disease-free survival in patients with B-cell PTLD. We have recently observed an increased incidence of HGBL in patients receiving IST following solid-organ transplant. Intensive induction regimens (ex: DA-R-EPOCH) in non-transplant HGBL has been associated with improved complete responses. Intensive regimens have not been previously evaluated in patients with PTLD. The aim of this study is to compare the tolerability of DA-R-EPOCH to R-CHOP in post-transplant patients with HGBL. Methods: Patients treated with either DA-R-EPOCH or R-CHOP were included in this study following IRB approval. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, had biopsy-confirmed B-cell PTLD, and were treated with at least one cycle of DA-R-EPOCH or R-CHOP. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), toxicities, and hospitalizations due to treatment-related toxicities. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.22 software Results: Sixty-three patients had biopsy-confirmed PTLD. Of these, 26 met inclusion criteria. Among these 26 patients, 19 (73.1%) were men; median age was 57 years (18-75 years); and transplants included 3 (11.5%) lung, 4 (15.4%) heart, 9 (34.6%) kidney, 8 (30.8%) liver, 2 (7.7%) pancreas, and 1 (3.8%) stem cell. All patients were receiving IST at the time of diagnosis of PTLD. Pathology reports found that 24 (92.3%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-like PTLD, and 11 (57.9%) had EBV-positive disease. HGBL was observed in 10 (38.5%) patients. Seven patients received DA-R-EPOCH, and 19 received R-CHOP. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. There was a significantly higher number of patients with HGBL in the DA-R-EPOCH arm compared with the R-CHOP arm (100% [7/7] vs. 15.8% [3/19]; 95% CI, -0.01-1.00; p=0.001). The median number of cycles administered was not significantly different between the groups (4.6 cycles vs. 5 cycles; 95% CI, 4.33-6.07; p=0.645). Dose intensification occurred in 8 of 32 cycles for patients who received DA-R-EPOCH. The median follow-up time for patients treated with DA-R-EPOCH was shorter (10 months) than for patients treated with R-CHOP (29 months). PFS was not found to be significantly different between the DA-R-EPOCH and R-CHOP arms (10.4 months vs. 61.4 months; 95% CI, 1.80-18.99; p=0.31). Patients with EBV-positive disease had inferior PFS compared with EBV-negative disease (7.37 months vs. NR; 95% CI, 1.02-10.2; p=0.046). In addition, OS, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hospitalizations, and hospitalizations due to febrile neutropenia were not significantly different between groups, though trends toward higher rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hospitalizations was observed in the DA-R-EPOCH group. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the role of intensive induction therapy in patients with HGBL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements observed in solid organ transplant recipients. In patients with PTLD, DA-R-EPOCH is a well-tolerated regimen with concurrent taper in IST. However, this strategy may not overcome the poor prognosis of HGBL. Dose adjustments beyond level 2 were limited by cytopenias. Figure Figure. Disclosures Reddy: KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; INFINITY: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2915-2915
Author(s):  
Timothy J Voorhees ◽  
Natalie S Grover ◽  
Jonathan Galeotti ◽  
Nathan D Montgomery ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
...  

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) represent a heterogeneous group of immune-deficiency related lymphoid malignancies occurring after solid organ transplant (SOT) or bone marrow transplant. Monomorphic PTLD (mPTLD) is typically characterized by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though other mature B and T-cell lymphomas make up a small contribution. In one of the largest prospective clinical trials in PTLD, Trappe et al described a risk stratified sequential treatment approach using rituximab (R) monotherapy induction followed by either (R) consolidation or chemoimmunotherapy (chemoR) based on interim response. The role of cytogenetic and immunohistochemistry (IHC) risk stratification have not been fully described in mPTLD. In this study, we aim to identify clinical factors which may lead to differences in clinical outcomes in mPTLD. Methods: Pts diagnosed with mPTLD following SOT at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill were identified by an IRB approved EMERSE query of the medical record. Histologic classification was determined by pathologist review at the time of diagnosis. DLBCL subtype was determined as either germinal center B-Cell (GCB) type, non-GCB type, or unclassifiable using Hans IHC criteria. Double-Hit lymphoma (DHL) was defined as the presence of a MYC rearrangement in combination with either a BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement by in-situ hybridization. Double expressor lymphoma (DEL) was defined as the presence of MYC and BCL2 co-expression by IHC. Additional copies of MYC or BCL2 were determined by in-situ hybridization. Clinical responses were determined per Lugano criteria. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of covariates of interest with overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 29 pts were diagnosed with mPTLD between 2010 and 2019. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range, 19-84 years). Transplanted organs included 16 kidney (56%), 5 lung (17%), 4 liver (14%), 3 heart (10%), and 1 kidney/heart (3%). The median time from transplant to diagnosis was 7.1 years (range, 0.2 to 24.5 years). Sub-classification of mPTLD revealed 11 non-GCB type (38%), 10 GCB type (35%), 7 unclassifiable DLBCL (24%), and 1 PTCL (3%). EBV encoded RNA (EBER) in-situ hybridization was positive in 10 pts (35%) and concurrent EBV reactivation was detected in 7 of the 10 pts. Both categorized EBV encoded RNA (EBER) in-situ hybridization, and GCB vs non-GCB type mPTLD did not appear to be significantly associated with OS. mPTLD that was DHL (1 pt), DEL (3 pts), or had extra copies of MYC/BCL2 (3 pts) had significantly shorter OS (p=0.006, Figure 1). The 1 year OS for those with high risk cytogenetics and IHC was 29% [95% CI: 4% to 61%] versus those without at 76% [52% to 89%]. Consistent with prior studies, pts with revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) high (3-5) had a significantly shorter OS (p=0.001, Figure 2). The 1 year OS for those with dichotomized R-IPI high was 38% [95% CI: 14% to 63%] versus those with R-IPI low at 87% [95% CI: 56% to 96%]. All pts had a reduction in immunosuppression at diagnosis. Fourteen pts (48%) were treated with front-line (R) monotherapy. Seven of these pts achieved a CR (50%), 3 pts achieved a PR, 3 pts developed progressive disease and 1 pt died during therapy. Eleven pts (38%) were treated with front-line chemoR. Seven of these pts achieved a CR, 3 pts achieved a PR, and 1 pt died during therapy. Pts who achieved a CR or PR with (R) monotherapy induction had a better OS compared to pts who either had no response to (R) or were treated with chemoR (p=0.01, Figure 3). The 1 year OS for (R) CR/PR was 90% [47% to 99%] versus all other pts including those treated with combination chemoR at 47% [23% to 68%]. Of note, pts who achieved a CR with either (R) induction or chemoR in the front-line setting had borderline significantly improved OS (p=0.06). Conclusion: Response to therapy within mPTLD is quite variable. In this study, we reveal a population of mPTLD with particularly poor outcomes (DHL, DEL, and extra copies of MYC/BCL2). To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the dramatic impact of poor risk cytogenetic and IHC findings on clinical outcomes in mPTLD. As seen in other cohorts, high R-IPI score was associated with poor outcomes. Objective response to (R) induction in the front-line setting was associated with improved survival. Disclosures Grover: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Dittus:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Hasan Mahmood Mirza ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Hafsa Shahid ◽  
...  

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a B-cell proliferation disorder that results from disruption in the physiological mechanisms for proliferation in an immunocompromised host after a solid organ transplant. Our study aims to review the demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes after transplantation. We also aim to study the role of immunosuppression induction therapy, the effect of PTLD on survival, and the effective chemotherapy used for B-cell disorders leading to improved survival. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past decade on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. 1741 articles were screened. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis and included three cohort studies and one prospective multicentric study. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, the reason for transplantation, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, response to therapy, adverse effects of therapy and mortality. Results: We studied 9617 patients in the included four studies, out of which 499 patients developed PTLD. Data in these studies was collected over the last 20-26 years. Median follow-up of patients since transplant was 3-9 years (average 7.5y). Table 1 The age of the patients ranged from 3-18 years with a male: female gender ratio of 48:52% and around 50% of the patients were seronegative to EBV pretransplant. The following drugs were used for immunosuppression: cyclosporin, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate, interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (basiliximab), corticosteroids, anti-thymocyte globulins(ATG). Kindel et al. narrated that the development of eosinophilic oesophagitis may be a marker for the development of PTLD.Gajarski et al. concluded that Post-transplant Immunosuppressive induction therapy with cytolytic drugs (e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody, ATG, thymoglobulin Basiliximab and daclizumab) , lowers the rate of PTLD, graft rejections, and early infections in post-transplant patients as compared patients who did not receive induction therapy . This depends upon the type of induction e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody was associated with increased PTLDs and graft rejection, while Thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists demonstrated to decrease both the outcomes. Claire et al. described that overall mortality is decreasing due to the ongoing better understanding of pathophysiology and treatment options related to solid organ transplant. The mortality of the post-transplant congenital heart disease group was higher as compared to the cardiomyopathy group due to high comorbidities and surgical complications. The study by Christopher et al. showed that EBV seronegativity before transplant is associated with an increased risk of PTLD. PTLD is associated with lower survival rates as compared to non-PTLD groups. Conclusion: Our review illustrates that pretransplant seronegativity, OKT3 monoclonal antibody, and the development of eosinophilic esophagitis during the immunosuppressive regime increase the risk of PTLD. This study demonstrates that with a better understanding of PTLD and tumor behavior, the all-cause mortality rates are falling significantly. PTLD is one of the leading causes of mortality in post-transplant patients. However, the immunosuppressive induction therapy, absence of eosinophilic esophagitis, thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists improve survival and outcomes in the post-transplant patient in terms of graft rejection, graft failure, and development of PTLD. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn E. Levi ◽  
Dianna Quan ◽  
Joseph T. Ho ◽  
B. K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters ◽  
Kenneth L. Tyler ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4500-4500
Author(s):  
Hillary S Maitland ◽  
George Stukenborg ◽  
Michael E. Williams

Abstract Abstract 4500 Background: Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) is a rare but potentially fatal complication occurring after solid organ transplant. PTLD is divided pathologically into three subgroups: early lesions, polymorphic PTLD, and monomorphic PTLD. The severity of these complications ranges from reactive lymphoid hyperplasia to aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin-like lymphoma. Most PTLD are of B cell lineage associated with infection or reactivation of Epstein Barr virus (EBV). Post-transplant patients on immunosuppressive therapy may lack sufficient cytotoxic T cells to clear EBV-infected B cells, allowing unchecked polyclonal B cell proliferation and infection of other cells with EBV. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine and tacrolimus has been associated with a higher risk for development of PTLD. This study examines the relationship between tacrolimus and PTLD among solid-organ transplant patients. Methods: Differences in time to PTLD between patients with and without exposure to tacrolimus were assessed using a retrospective, case-control design. University of Virginia Health System registry records were searched to identify all patients in the post- solid organ transplant population diagnosed with malignancy in the years 1998–2009. Bone marrow transplant patients were excluded. Following IRB approval, data was collected on the type of transplant, immunosuppressive regimen, time from transplant to development of PTLD, and lymphoma treatment; from electronic charts and pathology reports were reviewed. Results: A total of 2841 patients with solid organ transplants were identified, including1486 patients who received tacrolimus for immunosuppression. There were 26 cases of PTLD: 19 with exposure to tacrolimus (1.3%), and 8 without exposure (0.6%). The mean time to PTLD was 2.52 years (SD = 0.65) in the tacrolimus group, and was 6.75 years (SD = 1.80) among those not exposed. This difference in time to event was stat istically significant (Log-Rank = 5.347, p = .0208). Conclusion: In our population of post solid organ transplant patients with PTLD, exposure to tacrolimus was associated with significantly shorter time to development. Prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between type of immunosuppression and development of PTLD. These results suggest that immunosuppressive regimens using tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of developing PTLD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Rezvany ◽  
Mahmood Jeddi-Tehrani ◽  
Hodjattallah Rabbani ◽  
Ulla Ruden ◽  
Lennart Hammarstrom ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document