Long-term outcomes in healthy adults after radiofrequency ablation of T1a renal tumours

2013 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Ma ◽  
Selahattin Bedir ◽  
Jeffrey A. Cadeddu ◽  
Jeffrey C. Gahan
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Renal Tumours

Long-term Outcomes of Surgical Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in 3 Groups of Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. E110-E116
Author(s):  
Jiri Maly ◽  
Josef Kautzner ◽  
Renata Krausova ◽  
Slavomir Rokosny ◽  
Ivan Netuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

scholarly journals Radiofrequency ablation versus traditional liver resection and chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052094050
Author(s):  
Kezhong Tang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Linping Dong ◽  
Lantian Wang ◽  
Zhe Tang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term

Objective To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus liver resection and chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and local treatments for liver metastases (RFA, n = 20; liver resection, n = 20; and chemotherapy, n = 10) from 2008 to 2018. Results The short- and long-term outcomes of each local treatment were evaluated. The median overall survival (OS) after RFA was similar to that after liver resection (20 vs. 20 months, respectively) and longer than that after chemotherapy (20 vs. 10 months, respectively). The 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after RFA were 20% and 10%, respectively, while those in the liver resection group were 23.5% and 23.5%, respectively. The 3-year OS rate after chemotherapy was 10%. The size and number of metastases were prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer with liver metastasis without statistical significance. Conclusions Among patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer, OS and PFS were satisfactory and comparable between RFA and liver resection but better than those of chemotherapy. RFA is an appropriate option for patients with gastric cancer who have a solitary liver metastasis measuring ≤3.0 cm.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Ablation Following Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using Transarterial Chemoembolization: Long-term Outcomes

Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 293 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Shi ◽  
Ming Wu ◽  
Shan-Shan Lian ◽  
Zhi-Qiang Mo ◽  
Qing Gou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Hepatectomy with or without Radiofrequency Ablation

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1913-1923
Author(s):  
Li Long ◽  
Li Wei ◽  
Wu Hong
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing liver resection (LR) with or without radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A systematic search was performed using both medical subject headings and truncated word searches to identify all comparative studies published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A total of 10 studies which included 3900 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. Patients treated by LR gained better OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.82–2.37) and DFS (HR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.70–2.15) than those patients treated by LR 1 RFA, after pooling unadjusted HRs from the 10 studies. Five studies provided the data of adjusted HR. The pooled results showed that patients in the LR 1 RFA group had shorter OS (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18–2.32, P = 0.004) but similar DFS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.88) compared with patients in the LR group. Our meta-analysis showed that colorectal liver metastases patients who underwent LR gained better long-term outcomes compared with patients undergoing LR 1 RFA. However, after adjusting confounders, LR 1 RFA achieved comparable DFS with LR alone.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes Following Hepatic Resection and Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases

HPB Surgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew McKay ◽  
Katherine Fradette ◽  
Jeremy Lipschitz
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Study Support

Recently some have called for randomized controlled trials comparing RFA to hepatic resection, particularly for patients with only a few small metastases. The objectives were to compare local recurrence and survival following RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. This was a retrospective review of open RFA and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases between January 1998 and May 2007. All patients who had RFA were considered to have unresectable disease. 58 patients had hepatic resection and 43 had RFA. A 5-year survival after resection was 43% compared to 23% after RFA. For patients with solitary lesions, a 5-year survival was 48% after resection and 15% after RFA. Sixty percent of patients suffered local recurrences after RFA compared to 7% after hepatic resection. RFA is inferior to resection. The results observed in this study support the consensus that RFA cannot be considered an equivalent procedure to hepatic resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document