Clinical role of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer

The recommended therapy by EAU guidelines for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without chemotherapy. The role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in the treatment of mPCa is still controversial. Hence, a meta-analysis was conducted by comprehensively searching the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for the relevant studies published before September 1st, 2017. Our results successfully shed light on the relationship that RP for mPCa was associated with decreased cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (pooled HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.36–0.47) and enhanced overall survival (OS) (pooled HR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.44–0.55). Subsequent stratified analysis demonstrated that no matter how RP compared with no local therapy (NLT) or radiation therapy (RT), it was linked to a lower CSM (pooled HR = 0.36, 95%CI = 0.30–0.43 and pooled HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.43–0.73, respectively) and a higher OS (pooled HR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.44–0.56 and pooled HR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.33–0.65, separately). When comparing different levels of Gleason score, M-stage or N-stage, our results indicated that high level of Gleason score, M-stage or N-stage was associated with increased CSM. In summary, the outcomes of the present meta-analysis demonstrated that RP for mPCa was correlated with decreased CSM and enhanced OS in eligible patients of involved studies. In addition, patients with less aggressive tumors and good general health seemed to benefit the most. Moreover, no matter compared with NLT or RT, RP showed significant superiority in OS or CSM. Upcoming prospective randomized controlled trials were warranted to provide more high-quality data.

Download Full-text

Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-96993-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hwanik Kim ◽

Gyoohwan Jung ◽

Jin Hyuck Kim ◽

Seok-Soo Byun ◽

Sung Kyu Hong

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Primary Study ◽

Health Index ◽

Pathologic Features ◽

Prostate Health Index ◽

Prostate Health

AbstractWe evaluated the role of prostate health index (PHI) in predicting Gleason score (GS) upgrading in International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP GG) 1 & 2 prostate cancer (PCa) or adverse pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP). A total of 300 patients with prostate specific antigen ≥ 3 ng/mL, PHI and prostate biopsy (71 patients with RP included) were retrospectively included in the study. The primary study outcomes are PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as ISUP GG ≥ 2) diagnostic rate of PHI, and GS upgrading rate at RP specimen. The secondary outcomes are the comparison between GS upgrading and non-upgrading group, GS upgrading and high-risk PCa (ISUP GG ≥ 3 or ≥ pT3a) predictability of preoperative clinical factors. Overall, 139 (46.3%) and 92 (30.7%) were diagnosed with PCa and csPCa, respectively. GS upgrading rate was 34.3% in all patients with RP. Significant differences were shown in the total prostate volume (p = 0.047), the distribution of ISUP GG at biopsy (p = 0.001) and RP (p = 0.032), respectively. PHI values ≥ 55 [Odds ratio (OR): 3.64 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–12.68, p = 0.042] and presence of PI-RADS lesion ≥ 4 (OR: 7.03, 95% CI = 1.68–29.51, p = 0.018) were the significant predictors of GS upgrading in RP specimens (AUC = 0.737). PHI values ≥ 55 (OR: 9.05, 5% CI = 1.04–78.52, p = 0.046) is a significant factor for predicting adverse pathologic features in RP specimens (AUC = 0.781). PHI could predict GS upgrading in combination with PIRADS lesions ≥ 4 in ISUP GG 1 & 2. PHI alone could evaluate the possibility of high-risk PCa after surgery as well.

Download Full-text

The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.374 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 7 (11-12) ◽

pp. 722 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽

Ioannis Katafigiotis ◽

Petros Perimenis

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Strong Predictor ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Low Risk ◽

Surgical Margins ◽

Positive Surgical Margins ◽

Psa Density

Objectives: We evaluate the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict Gleason score upgrade between prostate biopsy material and radical prostatectomy specimen examination in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.Methods: Between January 2007 and November 2011, 133 low-risk patients underwent a radical prostatectomy. Using the modified Gleason criteria, tumour grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared to the biopsy results.Results: A tumour upgrade was noticed in 57 (42.9%) patients. Organ-confined disease was found in 110 (82.7%) patients, while extracapsular disease and seminal vesicles invasion was found in 19 (14.3%) and 4 (3.0%) patients, respectively. Positive surgical margins were reported in 23 (17.3%) patients. A statistical significant correlation between the preoperative PSA density value and postoperative upgrade was found (p = 0.001) and this observation had a predictive value (p = 0.002); this is in contrast to the other studied parameters which failed to reach significance, including PSA, percentage of cancer in biopsy and number of biopsy cores. Tumour upgrade was also highly associated with extracapsularcancer extension (p = 0.017) and the presence of positive surgical margins (p = 0.017).Conclusions: PSA density represents a strong predictor for Gleason score upgrade after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinical low-risk disease. Since tumour upgrade increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Download Full-text