Stereotactic Re-Irradiation for Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy and Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Prostate cancer recurrence in patients previously treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy is challenging. Re-irradiation could be an option, but data regarding efficacy and safety are lacking. We retrospectively evaluated salvage re-irradiation for local recurrence after prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy. We collected data from 48 patients who underwent salvage reirradiation with stereotactic radiation therapy for local prostate cancer recurrence in the prostatic bed at four French centers. Fifteen patients (31%) were on androgen deprivation therapy during stereotactic radiotherapy. Biochemical response and relapse-free survival were analyzed, and post-treatment toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology of Adverse Events criteria. Five patients had grade 3 late bladder toxicity (cystitis), three had grade 3 late incontinence, and one had grade 3 late chronic pain. At three months, 83% of patients had a positive biochemical response. The median follow-up was 22 months. At the end of the follow-up, 21 patients (43%) had a biochemical relapse. The median time to biologic relapse was 27 months. The biochemical relapse rates at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 52%, respectively. In conclusion, salvage re-irradiation for recurrent prostate cancer in the prostate bed may generate significant toxicity rates, and a prospective study with appropriate patient selection is needed to evaluate its effectiveness.

Establishing a Provincial Registry for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Providing Access to PSMA PET/CT in Ontario, Canada

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming established as a standard of care for the (re)staging of high-risk primary and prostate cancer recurrence after primary therapy. Despite the favorable performance of this imaging modality with high accuracy in disease detection, the availability of PSMA PET/CT varies across jurisdictions worldwide due to variability in the selection of PSMA PET/CT agent, regulatory approvals and funding. In Canada, PSMA based radiopharmaceuticals are still considered investigational new drug (IND), creating limitations in the deployment of these promising imaging agents. While regulatory approval rests with Health Canada, as a single payer health system, funding for Health Canada approved drugs and devices is decided by Provincial Health Ministries. Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) (OH-CCO) is the agency of the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Ontario responsible for making recommendations to the MOH around the organization and funding of cancer services within Ontario (population of 15 million), and the PET Steering Committee of OH-CCO is responsible for providing recommendations on the introduction of new PET radiopharmaceuticals and indications. For Health Canada approved PET radiopharmaceuticals like 18F-FDG, OH-CCO (on behalf of the MOH) provides coverage based on levels of evidence and specific PET Registries are established to aid in real-world evidence collection to inform OH-CCO regarding emerging PET applications. In the case of PSMA PET/CT, adapting this model to an IND PSMA PET/CT agent, 18F-DCFPyL, necessitated the creation of a hybrid Registry-Study model to leverage the existing OH-CCO Registry structure while respecting the need for a Health Canada Clinical Trials Application (CTA) for the deployment of this agent in the province. Within the first 2 years of the registry, over 1700 men have been imaged resulting in a change in management (compared to pre-PET management plans) in over half of the men imaged. In this article, we describe the organization and deployment of the PSMA PET/CT (PREP) Registry throughout the province to provide access for men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence along with key stakeholder perspectives and preliminary results.

Does Cancer Type Influence the Impact of Recurrence? A Review of the Experience of Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer Recurrence

Objective: Patients will experience a plethora of issues when faced with a recurrence of their cancer. It is unclear if cancer type is a significant factor in how recurrence is experienced by an individual. The aim of the current review is to explore the evidence base and summarise the experiences of patients specifically with a recurrence of breast or prostate cancer (the most common for women and men, respectively) and then provide a comparison of these experiences. These experiences include the physical, psychological and psychosocial issues that arise at this time.Methods: A systematic search was conducted of studies published between January 1994 and April 2019. Due to the mix of research designs used previously in the literature, this review was conducted in an integrative manner; allowing for inclusion of diverse research designs. Results were synthesised narratively, with data categorised according to physical, psychological, and psychosocial indices of quality of life. The review protocol was registered in the international database of prospective systematic reviews in health and social care- (CRD42019137381).Results: Fifteen breast cancer and six prostate cancer articles were identified, each reporting one relevant study. Patients reported several negative issues at the time of a breast or prostate cancer recurrence. Similarities were found between cancer types, with physical problems such as fatigue, psychological issues including anxiety and depressive symptoms, and psychosocial concerns such as issues with healthcare professionals common in both cancers. Certain findings were inconsistent across studies, with some experiences differing between studies rather than due to cancer type.Conclusions: Differences in the experience of recurrent cancer appear to be more heavily influenced by individual factors, rather than cancer type. Findings are confounded by gender; and should be considered preliminary. Effects of recurrence should be studied in samples where cancer type and gender are not confounded. Concerns are raised about available study quality and differing outcome measures in this interpretation. Care and support of the individual at the time of a cancer recurrence is a key focus. Future research suggestions with implications for clinical practise are included.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019137381.