F18-Choline PET/CT: a novel tool to localize parathyroid adenoma?

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniël H. van Raalte ◽  
Mariska C. Vlot ◽  
Anthonie Zwijnenburg ◽  
Reinier W. ten Kate
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 593-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Mapelli ◽  
Elena Busnardo ◽  
Patrizia Magnani ◽  
Massimo Freschi ◽  
Maria Picchio ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1033-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Orevi ◽  
Nanette Freedman ◽  
Eyal Mishani ◽  
Moshe Bocher ◽  
Orit Jacobson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. e207-e209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bliede Van den Broeck ◽  
Daan De Maeseneer ◽  
Ruth De Gersem ◽  
Kathia De Man

Author(s):  
Matteo Apicella ◽  
Stefano Bola ◽  
Duccio Volterrani ◽  
Laura Mazoni ◽  
Gianluca Frustaci ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Susanne Krome

Schwenck J et al. Intention-to-Treat Analysis of 68Ga-PSMA and 11C-Choline PET/CT Versus CT for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Surgery. J Nucl Med 2019; 60: 1359–1365 15–40 % der Patienten mit einem Prostatakarzinom erleiden postoperativ ein biochemisches Rezidiv. In der retrospektiven Analyse beeinflussten die Bildgebungsverfahren die Häufigkeit einer richtigen Therapiewahl. Die Autoren empfehlen die 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, die die höchste Genauigkeit aufwies. Unter Berücksichtigung der Kosten für inadäquate Behandlungen entstünden keine ökonomischen Nachteile.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1575
Author(s):  
Lucia Zanoni ◽  
Riccardo Mei ◽  
Lorenzo Bianchi ◽  
Francesca Giunchi ◽  
Lorenzo Maltoni ◽  
...  

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the characterization of intra-prostatic lesions in high-risk primary PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, in comparison with conventional [11C]Choline PET/CT and validated by prostatectomy pathologic examination. Secondary aims were to determine the performance of PET semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax; target-to-background ratios [TBRs], using abdominal aorta, bone marrow and liver as backgrounds) for malignant lesion detection (and best cut-off values) and to search predictive factors of malignancy. A six sextants prostate template was created and used by PET readers and pathologists for data comparison and validation. PET visual and semi-quantitative analyses were performed: for instance, patient-based, blinded to histopathology; subsequently lesion-based, un-blinded, according to the pathology reference template. Among 19 patients included (mean age 63 years, 89% high and 11% very-high-risk, mean PSA 9.15 ng/mL), 45 malignant and 31 benign lesions were found and 19 healthy areas were selected (n = 95). For both tracers, the location of the “blinded” prostate SUVmax matched with the lobe of the lesion with the highest pGS in 17/19 cases (89%). There was direct correlation between [18F]Fluciclovine uptake values and pISUP. Overall, lesion-based (n = 95), the performance of PET semiquantitative parameters, with either [18F]Fluciclovine or [11C]Choline, in detecting either malignant/ISUP2-5/ISUP4-5 PCa lesions, was moderate and similar (AUCs ≥ 0.70) but still inadequate (AUCs ≤ 0.81) as a standalone staging procedure. A [18F]Fluciclovine TBR-L3 ≥ 1.5 would depict a clinical significant lesion with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 68% respectively; whereas a SUVmax cut-off value of 4 would be able to identify a ISUP 4-5 lesion in all cases (sensitivity 100%), although with low specificity (52%). TBRs (especially with threshold significantly higher than aorta and slightly higher than bone marrow), may be complementary to implement malignancy targeting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document