scholarly journals Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the metabolic effects of modified‐release hydrocortisone versus standard glucocorticoid replacement therapy in adults with adrenal insufficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-651
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Bannon ◽  
Daniel Gallacher ◽  
Petra Hanson ◽  
Harpal S. Randeva ◽  
Martin O. Weickert ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-68
Author(s):  
Nduku Kiko ◽  
Atul Kalhan

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Patients with adrenal insufficiency require life-long glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Hydrocortisone (15–30 mg/day) and prednisolone (3–7.5 mg/day) are the preferred agents used although there is a lack of consensus among endocrinologists regarding the impact of different steroid regimens on quality of life, bone metabolism, cardiometabolic outcomes, adrenal crisis and infections. We carried out a retrospective systematic review of the literature to compare the efficacy and side effects of various glucocorticoid replacement regimens in patients with chronic adrenal insufficiency. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched PubMed, Cochrane Reviews and Google Scholar databases up to March 14, 2019, for studies evaluating various clinical outcomes with glucocorticoid replacement therapy. The abstracts and full studies were appraised and data extracted from the eligible studies. The quality of evidence was evaluated and risk of bias carried out. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 47 studies including 9 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 38 observational studies were evaluated in this systematic review. Prednisolone therapy was observed to be safe as well as efficacious as hydrocortisone although a higher dose was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. A lower hydrocortisone dose (15–20 mg/day) was associated with a reduction of blood pressure and improved clinical outcomes although this observation was based on a solitary RCT. Modified release hydrocortisone was observed to reduce the risk of CV disease based upon results from 2 of the RCTs. However, there was no conclusive evidence of benefit of modified release hydrocortisone and continuous subcutaneous hydrocortisone infusion in improving subjective health status. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Prednisolone therapy remains a safe and efficacious alternative to hydrocortisone although there are concerns of dyslipidaemia and CV disease with higher doses. There is limited level I evidence suggestive of a positive effect of modified release hydrocortisone on CV and metabolic outcomes, particularly weight reduction.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudmundur Johannsson ◽  
Alberto Falorni ◽  
Stanko Skrtic ◽  
Hans Lennernas ◽  
Marcus Quinkler ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudmundur Johannsson ◽  
Alberto Falorni ◽  
Stanko Skrtic ◽  
Hans Lennernäs ◽  
Marcus Quinkler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. M. Bannon ◽  
Daniel Border ◽  
Petra Hanson ◽  
John Hattersley ◽  
Martin O. Weickert ◽  
...  

PurposeTo compare metabolic effects of modified release hydrocortisone (MR-HC) with standard hydrocortisone (HC) therapies in adults with Adrenal Insufficiency (AI).MethodsAdult patients (n = 12) with AI, established on HC therapy, were recruited from Endocrinology clinics at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW), UK. Baseline (HC) metabolic assessments included fasting serum HbA1C, lipid and thyroid profiles, accurate measures of body composition (BodPod), and 24-h continuous measures of energy expenditure including Sleeping Metabolic Rate (SMR) using indirect calorimetry within the Human Metabolism Research Unit, UHCW. All participants then switched HC to MR-HC with repeat (MR-HC) metabolic assessments at 3 months. Paired-sample t-tests were used for data comparisons between HC and MR-HC assessments: P-value &lt;0.05 was considered significant.ResultsFollowing exclusion of 2 participants, analyses were based on 10 participants. Compared with baseline HC data, following 3 months of MR-HC therapy mean fat mass reduced significantly by −3.2 kg (95% CI: −6.0 to −0.4). Mean (SD) baseline HC fat mass vs repeat MR-HC fat mass: 31.9 kg (15.2) vs 28.7 kg (12.8) respectively, P = 0.03. Mean SMR increased significantly by +77 kcal/24 h (95% CI: 10–146). Mean (SD) baseline HC SMR vs repeat MR-HC SMR: 1,517 kcal/24 h (301) vs 1,594 kcal/24 h (344) respectively, P = 0.03. Mean body fat percentage reduced significantly by −3.4% (95% CI: −6.5 to −0.2). Other measures of body composition, energy expenditure, and biochemical analytes were equivalent between HC and MR-HC assessments.ConclusionsIn adults with AI, switching from standard HC to MR-HC associates with early metabolic benefits of reduced fat mass and increased SMR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document