Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri‐implant socket filling. A prospective case series

Author(s):  
Romane Lilet ◽  
Martin Desiron ◽  
Gary Finelle ◽  
Geoffrey Lecloux ◽  
Laurence Seidel ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 62-62
Author(s):  
Eduardo Montero ◽  
Ignacio Sanz-Martín ◽  
Ignacio Sánz Sanchez ◽  
Carolina Encalada ◽  
Javier Aracil ◽  
...  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 3828
Author(s):  
Jung-Gu Ji ◽  
Jung-A Yu ◽  
Seong-Ho Choi ◽  
Dong-Woon Lee

Vertical ridge augmentation for long-term implant stability is difficult in severely resorbed areas. We examined the clinical, radiological, and histological outcomes of guided-bone regeneration using novel titanium-reinforced microporous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (MP-ePTFE) membranes. Eighteen patients who underwent implant placement using a staged approach were enrolled (period: 2018–2019). Vertical ridge augmentation was performed in areas with vertical bone defects ≥ 4 mm. Twenty-six implant fixtures were placed in 14 patients. At implant placement six fixtures had relatively low stability. On cone-beam computed tomography, the average vertical changes were 4.2 ± 1.9 (buccal), 5.9 ± 2.7 (central), and 4.4 ± 2.8 mm (lingual) at six months after vertical ridge augmentation. Histomorphometric analyses revealed that the average proportions of new bone, residual bone substitute material, and soft tissue were 34.91 ± 11.61%, 7.16 ± 2.74%, and 57.93 ± 11.09%, respectively. Stable marginal bone levels were observed at 1-year post-loading. The residual bone graft material area was significantly lower in the exposed group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the vertical height change in the buccal side between immediately after the augmentation procedure and the implant placement reentry time (p = 0.371). However, all implants functioned well regardless of the exposure during the observation period. Thus, vertical ridge augmentation around implants using titanium-reinforced MP-ePTFE membranes can be successful.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariádene Pértile de Oliveira Rosa ◽  
José Martins da Rosa ◽  
Luís Pereira ◽  
Carlos Francischone ◽  
Bruno Sotto-Maior

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
Maria Eleni Oikonomou ◽  
Agamemno Chliaoutakis ◽  
Konstantinos Samanidis ◽  
Anthi Papachristodima ◽  
Georgios Ntagiantis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document