scholarly journals EAO‐299/PO‐SU‐027 | Two‐year follow‐up of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (S22) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Keyword(s):  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants

scholarly journals Oral Rehabilitation with Zygomatic Implants in a Patient with Cleft Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira ◽  
Mariana Schaffer Brackmann ◽  
Larissa Carvalho Trojan ◽  
Paulo Domingos Ribeiro Júnior ◽  
Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Fibrous Tissue ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
The Right ◽  
Zygomatic Implant

Edentulous patients with an atrophic maxilla associated with lip-palate fissures have unpredictable results after undergoing grafting procedures. In situations where the atrophic maxilla does not adequately allow reconstruction, the use of zygomatic implants has been indicated, and probably these implants can be indicated for the rehabilitation of patients with lip-palate fissures. This case report describes the oral rehabilitation treatment of a patient with a lip-palate cleft treated with zygomatic implants and implant-supported fixed prosthesis with two years of follow-up. A 65-year-old female patient had a lip-palate cleft and previously underwent surgery to close the cleft. The patient had a severely atrophic maxilla and had difficulty adapting to a removable total prosthesis. Due to the small amount of bone remaining and extensive fibrous tissue in the palate region, a rehabilitation with conventional implants associated with zygomatic implants was chosen. Two zygomatic implants and a conventional implant were placed on the right side, and a zygomatic implant and conventional implant were placed on the left side; these implants were later activated by a protocol-type prosthesis. The zygomatic implants provided an adequate aesthetic and functional outcome of the prosthesis in a patient with cleft palate.

scholarly journals Multiple Zygomatic Implants as an Alternative for Rehabilitation of the Extremely Atrophic Maxilla: A Case Letter With 55 Months of Follow-Up

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan ◽  
Paulo Domingos Ribeiro-Júnior ◽  
Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori ◽  
Geninho Thomé ◽  
Elisa Mattias Sartori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants

Three-year clinical prospective follow-up of extrasinus zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 926-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abilio Coppedê ◽  
Thiago de Mayo ◽  
Marcelo de Sá Zamperlini ◽  
Rodolfo Amorin ◽  
Ana Paula A. T. de Pádua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants

scholarly journals Computer‐aided approach for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation via using zygomatic implants: preliminary results of a cohort study up to 6 years follow‐up

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Gerardo Pellegrino ◽  
Francesco Basile ◽  
Francesco Grande ◽  
Agnese Ferri ◽  
Daniela Relics ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants ◽  
Computer Aided

scholarly journals Rehabilitation of Posterior Maxilla with Obturator3b2:?show $6# Supported by Zygomatic Implants

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Sankalp Mittal ◽  
Manoj Agarwal ◽  
Debopriya Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  
Prosthetic Rehabilitation ◽  
Avant Garde ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Maxillary Defect ◽  
Single Piece ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Zygomatic Implants ◽  
Tuberculous Osteomyelitis

Prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla and large maxillary defects can be done successfully by zygomaticimplant-supportedprosthesis. Zygomatic implants are anavant-gardeto complex andinvasive-freevascularised osteocutaneous flaps, distraction osteogenesis, and the solution to flap failures. A treated case of tuberculous osteomyelitis, with a class II (Aramany’s classification) maxillary defect, reported to oral maxillofacial department, Government Dental College (RUHS-CODS).The defect in this group was unilateral, retaining the anterior teeth. The patient was previously rehabilitated with a removable maxillary obturator. Inadequate retention affected essential functions like speaking, mastication, swallowing, esthetics, and so on due to lack of sufficient supporting tissues. A fixed prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior maxillary defect was done with obturator supported with twosingle-piecezygomatic implants. At 1-yearfollow-up,the patient was comfortable with the prosthesis, and no further complaints were recorded.

scholarly journals Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Pellegrino ◽  
Francesco Basile ◽  
Daniela Relics ◽  
Agnese Ferri ◽  
Francesco Grande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Zygomatic Implants ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Prosthetic Complications ◽  
Maxillary Atrophy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and clinical success rate, complications, and patients’ quality of life after computer-aided rehabilitation supported by zygomatic implants in cases of severe maxillary atrophy (ten patients) and in bone defects in oncologic patients (ten patients). All patients underwent computer-aided planning and surgery. Seventy-three zygomatic implants were placed. The mean follow-up period was 39.9 months. Implant survival and clinical success rate, the effectiveness of planning the implant length, biological and prosthetic complications, and the quality of life were evaluated. The five-year implant survival rate for patients with maxillary atrophy and oncologic patients was 97.4% and 96.7%, respectively. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. Two implant failures occurred in the first year. One implant failure was observed in each group. Minor biological and prosthetic complications occurred in both groups without significant differences. All complications were managed without affecting the treatment. The quality of life increased by 71.3% in the atrophic group and by 82.9% in the oncologic group. Zygomatic implant rehabilitation seems to be a reliable technique for patients with maxillary atrophy and for oncologic patients. The three-dimensional computer-aided approach allows the surgeon to plan the surgery and increase its predictability. Early prosthesis loading certainly allows for better functional outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document