Bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessment of body composition in infants and young children‐A systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaz Lyons‐Reid ◽  
José G. B. Derraik ◽  
Leigh C. Ward ◽  
Mya‐Thway Tint ◽  
Timothy Kenealy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Infants And Young Children

scholarly journals Validation of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of body composition in young children: the EarlyBird cohort

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 1163-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Hosking ◽  
Brad S. Metcalf ◽  
Alison N. Jeffery ◽  
Linda D. Voss ◽  
Terence J. Wilkin
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Fat Mass ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
X Ray

Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is simple and non-invasive, making it particularly suitable for use in children. There is insufficient evidence of the validity of foot-to-foot BIA compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion method in healthy young children. Our objective was to assess the validity of foot-to-foot BIA against DEXA in a large cohort of healthy young children. Body composition was measured by foot-to-foot BIA and DEXA in 203 children (mean age 8·9 (sd0·3) years). Bland–Altman and simple linear regression analyses were used to determine agreement between methods. BIA overestimated fat-free mass by a mean of 2·4 % in boys and 5·7 % in girls, while fat mass was underestimated by 6·5 % in boys and 10·3 % in girls. The percentage fat recorded by BIA was, accordingly, also lower than by DEXA (boys 4·8 %; girls 12·8 %). In boys, however, there were correlations between the size of the difference between methods and the size of the measure under consideration such that in smaller boys fat-free mass was underestimated (r − 0·57;P < 0·001) while fat mass and percentage fat were overestimated (r0·74 for fat mass;r0·69 for percentage fat; bothP < 0·001) with the reverse in bigger boys. Mean differences between techniques were greater in the girls than in the boys but in boys only, the direction of the differences was dependent upon the size of the child. Therefore, BIA may be useful for large-scale studies but is not interchangeable with DEXA and should be interpreted with caution in individuals.

scholarly journals POS-129 BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS IN DETERMINING BODY COMPOSITION IN SRI LANKAN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. S52
Author(s):  
D. BASNAYAKE ◽  
A. Nayanamali ◽  
H. Amarathunga ◽  
N. Erandika ◽  
J. Pathiraja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Sri Lankan

Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess human body composition

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1179-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sufia Islam ◽  
Iqbal Kabir ◽  
Mohammad A. Wahed ◽  
Michael I. Goran ◽  
Dilip Mahalanabis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Human Body Composition

The Accuracy of Hand-to-Hand Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Predicting Body Composition in College-Age Female Athletes

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1040-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R Esco ◽  
Michele S Olson ◽  
Henry N Williford ◽  
Suheil N Lizana ◽  
Angela R Russell
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
College Age

Techniques For Assessment Of Body Composition In Health

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla M Prado ◽  
Camila LP Oliveira ◽  
M Cristina Gonzalez ◽  
Steven B Heymsfield
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Composition Analysis ◽  
Body Composition Assessment ◽  
Air Displacement Plethysmography ◽  
X Ray

Body composition assessment is an important tool in both clinical and research settings able to characterize the nutritional status of individuals in various physiologic and pathologic conditions. Health care professionals can use the information acquired by body composition analysis for the prevention and treatment of diseases, ultimately improving health status. Here we describe commonly used techniques to assess body composition in healthy individuals, including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, air displacement plethysmography, and ultrasonography. Understanding the key underlying concept(s) of each assessment method, as well as its advantages and limitations, facilitates selection of the method of choice and the method of the compartment of interest. This review contains 5 figures, 3 tables and 52 references Key words: air displacement plethysmography, bioelectrical impedance analysis, body composition, disease, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, health, muscle mass, nutritional status, obesity, sarcopenia, ultrasound fat mass

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document