scholarly journals The development of outcome key performance indicators for systemic anti‐cancer therapy using a modified Delphi method

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara Mellett ◽  
Anita O'Donovan ◽  
Catherine Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Modified Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Anti Cancer

Derivation of a procedural performance checklist for ultrasound-guided femoral arterial line placement using the modified Delphi method

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 715-722
Author(s):  
Jessica Baez ◽  
Elizabeth Powell ◽  
Megan Leo ◽  
Uwe Stolz ◽  
Lori Stolz
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Method ◽  
Competency Assessment ◽  
Arterial Line ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Arterial Access ◽  
Modified Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Item Checklist ◽  
Standard Quality ◽  
Femoral Arterial Access

Background: Many specialties utilize procedural performance checklists as an aid to teach residents and other learners. Procedural checklists ensure that the critical steps of the desired procedure are performed in a specified manner every time. Valid measures of competency are needed to evaluate learners and ensure a standard quality of care. The objective of this study was to employ the modified Delphi method to derive a procedural checklist for use during placement of ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access. Methods: A 27-item procedural checklist was provided to 14 experts from three acute care specialties. Using the modified Delphi method, the checklist was serially modified based on expert feedback. Results: Three rounds of the study were performed resulting in a final 23-item checklist. Each item on the checklist received at least 70% expert agreement on its inclusion in the final checklist. Conclusion: A procedural performance checklist was created for ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access using the modified Delphi method. This is an objective tool to assist procedural training and competency assessment in a variety of clinical and educational settings.

A modified Delphi method to create a scoring system for assessing team performance during maternal cardiopulmonary arrest

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Banayan ◽  
Angela Blood ◽  
Yoon Soo Park ◽  
Sajid Shahul ◽  
Barbara M. Scavone
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Arrest ◽  
Modified Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi

Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1116-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zang ◽  
Ning Fan ◽  
Yong Hai ◽  
S. B. Lu ◽  
Q. J. Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Method ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Modified Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi

scholarly journals Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyo Sasahara ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kizawa ◽  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Yuumi Iwamitsu ◽  
Junji Otaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi Method ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation

Developing a set of key performance indicators for monitoring sustainability of forest functions in the Hyrcanian forests

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-167
Author(s):  
S.Z. Goushehgir ◽  
J. Feghhi ◽  
J.L. Innes
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Method ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Sustainable Management ◽  
Cognitive Mapping ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Cumulative Impacts ◽  
Hyrcanian Forests ◽  
Forest Functions ◽  
Northern Forests ◽  
Two Phases

This study identifies key performance indicators for monitoring the sustainability of forest functions in the northern forests of Iran. This process was conducted in two phases through the Delphi method, and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM). The Delphi method classified indicators according to two properties, importance and measurability. These were used to identify four classes: (a) important and measurable, (b) important and less measurable, (c) less important and measurable, (d) less important and less measurable. Indicators placed in groups (a) and (b) were then used to develop a set of key performance indicators using FCM. The FCM enabled the evaluation of the overall cumulative impacts of all indicators within the network, individually and collectively, through their interactions with other indicators. The selected methods and possible application of the key performance indicators could be used to determine how to achieve the sustainable management of a forest area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document