Early intervention for everyone? A review of cross-cultural issues and their treatment in ultra-high-risk (UHR) cohorts

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 796-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Deriu ◽  
Marie Rose Moro ◽  
Laelia Benoit

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
GeumSook Shim ◽  
Do-Hyung Kang ◽  
Jung-Seok Choi ◽  
Myung Hun Jung ◽  
Soo Jin Kwon ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S191-S192
Author(s):  
H. Stain ◽  
L. Mawn ◽  
S. Common ◽  
M. Pilton ◽  
T. Andrew

ObjectivesEvidence from meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials shows interventions for young people at ultra-high risk (UHR) of developing psychosis are effective both clinically and economically. While research evidence has begun to be integrated into clinical guidelines, there is a lack of research on the implementation of these guidelines. This paper examines service provision for UHR individuals in accordance with current clinical guidelines within the National Health Service (NHS) in England.MethodA self-report online survey was completed by clinical leaders of Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) teams (n = 50) within the NHS across the UK.ResultsOf the 50 EIP teams responding (from 30 NHS Trusts), 53% reported inclusion of the UHR group in their service mandate, with age range predominantly 14–5 years (81%) and service provided for at least 12 months (53%). Provision of services according to NICE clinical guidelines showed 50% of services offered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis, and 42% offered family intervention. Contrary to guidelines, 50% of services offered antipsychotic medication. Around half of services provided training in assessment by CAARMS, psycho-education, CBT for psychosis, family work and treatment for anxiety and depression.ConclusionsDespite clear evidence for the benefit of early intervention in this population, current provision for UHR within EIP services in England does not match clinical guidelines. While some argue this is due to a lack of allocated funding, it is important to note the similar variable adherence to clinical guidelines in the treatment of people with established schizophrenia.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.



2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 426-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. de Koning ◽  
O. J. N. Bloemen ◽  
T. A. M. J. van Amelsvoort ◽  
H. E. Becker ◽  
D. H. Nieman ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1905-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Cocchi ◽  
Anna Meneghelli ◽  
Arcadio Erlicher ◽  
Alessia Pisano ◽  
Maria Teresa Cascio ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darran Flynn ◽  
Damian Smith ◽  
Luke Quirke ◽  
Stephen Monks ◽  
Harry G Kennedy


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen J. Stain ◽  
Lauren Mawn ◽  
Stephanie Common ◽  
Marie Pilton ◽  
Andrew Thompson






Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document