scholarly journals Visual lameness assessment in comparison to quantitative gait analysis data in horses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Hardeman ◽  
A. Egenvall ◽  
F. M. Serra Bragança ◽  
J. H. Swagemakers ◽  
M. H. W. Koene ◽  
...  
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 789
Author(s):  
David Kreuzer ◽  
Michael Munz

With an ageing society comes the increased prevalence of gait disorders. The restriction of mobility leads to a considerable reduction in the quality of life, because associated falls increase morbidity and mortality. Consideration of gait analysis data often alters surgical recommendations. For that reason, the early and systematic diagnostic treatment of gait disorders can spare a lot of suffering. As modern gait analysis systems are, in most cases, still very costly, many patients are not privileged enough to have access to comparable therapies. Low-cost systems such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) still pose major challenges, but offer possibilities for automatic real-time motion analysis. In this paper, we present a new approach to reliably detect human gait phases, using IMUs and machine learning methods. This approach should form the foundation of a new medical device to be used for gait analysis. A model is presented combining deep 2D-convolutional and LSTM networks to perform a classification task; it predicts the current gait phase with an accuracy of over 92% on an unseen subject, differentiating between five different phases. In the course of the paper, different approaches to optimize the performance of the model are presented and evaluated.


2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Merory ◽  
Joanne E. Wittwer ◽  
Christopher C. Rowe ◽  
Kate E. Webster

1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 413-416
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Isobe ◽  
Takeshi Minamizaki ◽  
Makoto Okuno ◽  
Kichizo Yamamoto ◽  
Kiyoo Furuse ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S3
Author(s):  
A. Castagna ◽  
S. Frittoli ◽  
F. Del Sorbo ◽  
A. Elia ◽  
L. Romito ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-152
Author(s):  
Kei Ohtsuka ◽  
Masahiko Mukaino ◽  
Fumihiro Matsuda ◽  
Eiichi Saitoh

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 6331
Author(s):  
Uri Gottlieb ◽  
Tharani Balasukumaran ◽  
Jay R. Hoffman ◽  
Shmuel Springer

Backward walking (BW) is being increasingly used in neurologic and orthopedic rehabilitation as well as in sports to promote balance control as it provides a unique challenge to the sensorimotor control system. The identification of initial foot contact (IC) and terminal foot contact (TC) events is crucial for gait analysis. Data of optical motion capture (OMC) kinematics and inertial motion units (IMUs) are commonly used to detect gait events during forward walking (FW). However, the agreement between such methods during BW has not been investigated. In this study, the OMC kinematics and inertial data of 10 healthy young adults were recorded during BW and FW on a treadmill at different speeds. Gait events were measured using both kinematics and inertial data and then evaluated for agreement. Excellent reliability (Interclass Correlation > 0.9) was achieved for the identification of both IC and TC. The absolute differences between methods during BW were 18.5 ± 18.3 and 20.4 ± 15.2 ms for IC and TC, respectively, compared to 9.1 ± 9.6 and 10.0 ± 14.9 for IC and TC, respectively, during FW. The high levels of agreement between methods indicate that both may be used for some applications of BW gait analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 2335-2341
Author(s):  
Zhuang Wu ◽  
Min Zhong ◽  
Xu Jiang ◽  
Bo Shen ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon Jong Pyo ◽  
Hanjun Kim ◽  
Il Soo Kim ◽  
Young-Min Park ◽  
Mi-Jung Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document