Efficacy and safety of a VWF/FVIII concentrate (wilate®) in inherited von Willebrand disease patients undergoing surgical procedures

Abstract Purpose: Wilate® represents a new generation VWF/FVIII-concentrate for the treatment of von Willebrand patients with high purity and two independent virus inactivation steps. The high purity of the product was developed to preserve the functionality of Wilate®’s VWF/FVIII complex at a physiological ratio of about 1:1. Methods: A prospective multicenter study is conducted in 47 VWD patients to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical efficacy and safety of Wilate® in acute bleedings and surgical prophylaxis. For PK studies, plasma levels of VWF:RCo, FVIII:C, VWF:Ag were measured up to 72 hrs after injection of 50 IU of FVIII/kgBW. Clinical efficacy and tolerability was rated on a four-point scale. Final decisions on dosing were based on the investigators’ clinical judgment. Summary of results: Mean half-life of VWF:RCo in type 3 patients (n=9) was 17.1 hrs. Mean recovery for VWF:RCo was 1.5 [% per IU/kg] and 2.0 [% per IU/kg] for FVIII:C. The clearance for VWF:RCo was 2.5 [ml/h/kg] for all and 3.9 [ml/h/kg] in type 3 patients. 33 patients have been treated for a total number of 658 bleeds. Of these, 31 patients (69%) were type 3 patients. The average dose/kgBW/ED was calculated to 29.3 IU FVIII:C. Furthermore efficacy and safety was studied in 16 patients undergoing 24 surgical procedures. The overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis) of Wilate® was rated as excellent or good for 23/24 procedures (96%). One patient with a laparoscopic cholecystectomy required two additional blood transfusions. The tolerability was assessed as very good/good by investigators and patients in all surgical cases. Conclusion: Wilate® documented favourable PK-properties in VWD patients. The interim results of these prospective clinical studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the double-virus-inactivated Wilate® for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes and surgical procedures in patients with VWD.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of a recombinant Von Willebrand Factor treatment in patients with inherited Von Willebrand Disease requiring surgical procedures

Haemophilia ◽

10.1111/hae.14242 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 270-276

Author(s):

Dominique Desprez ◽

Nicolas Drillaud ◽

Claire Flaujac ◽

Fabienne Volot ◽

Brigitte Pan‐Petesch ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surgical Procedures ◽

Von Willebrand Factor ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Von Willebrand ◽

Willebrand Factor

Download Full-text

Clinical assessment of efficacy and safety of DDAVP

Hämostaseologie ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1619106 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 30 (S 01) ◽

pp. S172-S175 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

W. Miesbach ◽

S. Krekeler ◽

O. Dück ◽

B. Llugaliu ◽

G. Asmelash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Pressure ◽

Adverse Reactions ◽

Fluid Intake ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Haemophilia A ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Drug Reactions ◽

Clinical Routine ◽

Von Willebrand ◽

Mild Haemophilia

SummaryThe efficacy of DDAVP (1-deamino-8-D-argi-nine-vasopressin, desmopressin) in mild haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD) has been established and the use of this well tolerated drug has become clinical routine. In case of increased fluid intake and based on very rarely occurring hyponatraemia, the indication of administration of DDAVP intravenously (i. v.) has to be performed diligently in elderly patients and in children below the age of five years. Aim, patients: Due to clinical practice we were interested in finding prospective parameter potentially correlating with adverse reactions of DDAVP and initiated this study. From 2007 to 2008, we included 49 patients suspicious to suffer from mild haemophilia A (n = 1) or VWD (n = 48) and investigated efficacy and safety of DDAVP after intravenous administration (mean: 0.29 ± 0.032 μg/kg body weight). They underwent clinical and laboratory investigation and were questioned with regard to potential adverse reactions immediately and three days after administration of DDAVP.: Results, conclusion: Most adverse reactions were mild and no serious adverse drug reactions were either observed or reported by the subjects. We identified significant changes of heart rate, blood pressure and leucocytes after conduct of the DDAVP test. The value of these findings has to be investigated in later prospective randomized studies. Further research on identification of prospective parameter is currently ongoing.

Download Full-text

Major haemorrhage related to surgery in patients with type 1 and possible type 1 von Willebrand disease

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1160/th-07-12-0757 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 100 (05) ◽

pp. 797-802 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Alicia Blanco ◽

Roberto Chuit ◽

Susana Meschengieser ◽

Ana Kempfer ◽

Cristina Farías ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Family History ◽

Surgical Procedures ◽

Tooth Extraction ◽

Positive Family History ◽

Major Haemorrhage ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Laboratory Test Results ◽

Von Willebrand

SummaryPatients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) frequently bleed under a challenge. The aim of our study was to identify predictive markers of perioperative major haemorrhage in type 1 (VWF:RCo = 15–30 IU dl-1) and possible type 1 (VWF:RCo = 31–49 IU dl-1)VWD patients. We recorded perioperative bleeding complications previous to diagnosis and laboratory parameters in 311 patients with 498 surgical procedures. The patients were grouped according to the absence (A) or presence (B) of perioperative major haemorrhages. Eighty-one patients (26%) and 87 surgical procedures (17.5%) presented major haemorrhages associated with surgeries. There was no difference between the percentage of type 1 and possible type 1 VWD patients who had major haemorrhages (32.6% and 24.8% respectively; p=ns). No difference in the prevalence of O blood group, age, gender, positive family history and laboratory test results (FVIII and VWF) was observed, independent of the haemorrhagic tendency. Bleeding after tooth extraction was the most frequent clinical feature observed in patients with perioperative major haemorrhages. The bleeding score and the number of bleeding sites (≥3) were not predictors of major haemorrhage associated with surgery. Caesarean section and adenotonsillectomy showed the highest frequency of major haemorrhages (24.6% and 22.3%, respectively). In conclusion, type 1 and possible type 1VWD patients showed similar incidence of perioperative major haemorrhages. Laboratory tests and positive family history did not prove to be effective at predicting major haemorrhages in patients that had either type 1 or possible type 1 VWD. The history of bleeding after tooth extraction could define risk factors of major haemorrhage.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Versus Biological Response of Desmopressin (DDAVP) In Inherited Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) Types 1 and 2: Initial Results From the International Study Group on DDAVP In VWD In a Cohort of 229 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.238.238 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 238-238

Author(s):

Augusto B. Federici ◽

Alfonso Iorio ◽

Giancarlo Castaman

Keyword(s):

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Biological Response ◽

Working Party ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Excessive Bleeding ◽

Baseline Levels ◽

Von Willebrand

Abstract Abstract 238 Background: Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for most patients with mild-moderate forms of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) because it can induce the release of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) from cellular compartments. However, despite the widespread use of DDAVP since 1977, there are only a few prospective clinical trials aimed at determining benefits and limits of this approach. Aims and design of the study: To correlate efficacy and safety with biological response of DDAVP in a large cohort of VWD1 and VWD2 patients followed-up for 24 months in a prospective observational study organized on behalf of the Working Party on DDAVP in VWD of the ISTH-SSC on VWF and of Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE). The study is registered at the EMEA with number EudraCT-2005-004496-38. Patients and Methods: VWD patients were enrolled after obtaining Ethical approval from local IRB. Inclusion criteria: inherited VWD without any age restriction, with previous diagnosis of VWD1 and VWD2 according to ISTH recommendations. Biological response: At enrollment patients were exposed to 0.3 ug/kg DDAVP intravenous injection and to blood withdrawal for measuring VWF/FVIII activities before and after 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours. Complete: both VWF:RCo and FVIII:C >50 IU/dL at 2 hours; partial: VWF:RCo or FVIII:C <50 IU/dL but increased at least 3-fold; absent: neither criterion. Clinical Response. Excellent: no excessive bleeding; Good: excess bleeding without need for VWF concentrate; Poor: excess bleeding with need for VWF concentrate. Statistical analyses were performed only on confirmed patients after the blind and independent evaluation by 2 members of the Steering Committee on these criteria: VWD=baseline levels of VWF:RCo <55 U/dL; VWD2= baseline VWF:RCo/Ag ratio≤ 0.6; VWD1 accelerated clearance: rapid increase of VWF:RCo/FVIII after 0.5–1 hrs with return to baseline levels after 2–4 hrs. Results: 229/268 (85%) patients enrolled at 13 participating Centers in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy and Hungary were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Demographic data and lab tests (mean+SD) at baseline were as follows: Among VWD2, VWD2A(n=15), VWD2B(n=1), VWD2M(n=12), VWD2N(n=3) were identified. Biological response was complete, partial and absent in 89%, 10% and 1% of VWD and correlated with baseline levels of VWF:RCo<30 U/dL (Fisher's exact =0.001). Among VWD1, those (n=15) with C1130F and R1205H mutations showed accelerated clearance. During the 24-month follow-up, 62/86 (72%) patients received >1 injection of DDAVP for bleedings (n=102), deliveries (n=13), dental extractions (n=27), minor/major surgeries (n=46). Total number of injections was 652 with median, range/episode during bleedings (2,1-12), deliveries (3,1-3), dental extractions (1,1-6), surgeries (3.6,1-11). Clinical efficacy was excellent/good in bleedings (92%), deliveries (85%), dental extractions (100%), surgeries (91%). Poor efficacy was observed in 6 cases with VWD2A (n=4) during GI bleedings (n=3) or abdominal surgery (n=1) and VWD1 (n=2) during deliveries and surgery. Side effects observed in 16 patients were mainly minor, such as headache, facial flushing and tachycardia; water retention was reported in 2 cases (1 delivery, 1 surgery) only after >6 injections of the drug. Conclusions: Based on the results of this prospective clinical trial, we confirm that DDAVP is an effective and safe drug at low costs for managing patients with VWD1 and VWD2 once tested for their biological response: therefore it should be always considered as the first approach during bleedings and major/minor surgeries in responsive VWD patients. Disclosures: Federici: CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Effectiveness of Desmopressin for the Management of Delivery and Major Surgery in Patients with Mild-Moderate Von Willebrand Disease: Final Analysis of the Prodeswil Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.759.759 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 759-759

Author(s):

Augusto Bramante Federici ◽

Giancarlo Castaman ◽

Alfonso Iorio ◽

Emily Oliovecchio ◽

Prodeswil Investigators

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Oral Surgery ◽

Biological Response ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Major Surgery ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Bleeding Episodes ◽

Von Willebrand

Abstract Introduction. Despite the fact that desmopressin (DDAVP) is considered the treatment of choice in the majority of patients with inherited von Willebrand disease (VWD), there are still open questions about the efficacy and safety of the use of DDAVP to manage recurrent bleeding episodes, delivery and major surgery. In fact, to avoid tachyphylaxis and possible side effects with repeated DDAVP injections, VWF concentrates are usually preferred to manage delivery and major surgery also in VWD patients proven to be DDAVP-responsive. No prospective data have been reported so far to correlate biological response with DDAVP clinical efficacy in VWD and guide clinical practice. Design, aims and methods. ProDesWilis an investigator-driven Pro spective study on D esmopressin e fficacy and s afety of patients with inherited von Wil lebrand disease assessed at enrolment for DDAVP biological response during a test-infusion. Inclusion criteria: VWD diagnosis without any age restriction according to bleeding score >4, VWF activity levels <45U/dL, and at least another affected member in the family. DDAVP Biological Response: VWD were classified as complete, partial or no-responders as previously reported (Blood 2008;111:3531). Treatment regimens: DDAVP given intravenously or subcutaneously (0.3 ug/Kg) or by nasal spray (4 ug/Kg) according to preparations available in different countries with or without standard doses of anti-fibrinolytic agents (Epsilon-amino-caproic acid, EACA or tranexamic acid, TA). In case of major surgery, DDAVP was used together with TA using a 3dayOn-4dayOff-3dayOn schedule. DDAVP efficacy-safety evaluated with criteria currently used for VWF concentrates, with poor efficacy defined when VWF concentrates were needed. Patients were prospectively followed up for 24 months by ProDesWil Investigators who reported detailed information about DDAVP therapy used for bleeds, deliveries, oral and minor/major surgeries Results. 268 patients were enrolled in this 24-month prospective study. DDAVP-biological response: 225/268 (85%) patients met inclusion criteria as VWD1(n=184), VWD1C (n=14), VWD2A(n=15), VWD2M(n=12). The 14 VWD1C with accelerated clearance carried C1130F and R1205H mutations. DDAVP biological response was complete, partial and absent in 89%, 10% and 1% of all VWD. DDAVP clinical efficacy and safety: during the 24-month follow-up 84/225 (37.3%) received DDAVP for bleeding episodes (n=104), oral surgeries (n=33), deliveries (n=12), other minor/major surgeries (n=25). Total DDAVP injections were 652 with median, range/episode during bleeds (2,1-12), oral surgeries (1,1-10), deliveries (3,1-13), minor/major surgeries (3.6,1-16). Clinical efficacy was excellent/good in bleeds (93.3%), oral surgery (100%), deliveries (91.7%), minor/major surgeries (92.3%). All VWD treated for oral surgery with (75%) and without (25%) EACA/TA had excelled/good outcomes. Efficacy was rated excellent/good in 96/104 bleeds, with 8 episodes rated poor during menorrhagia (n=4) in 2 VWD1 and 2 VWD2A, during nose (n=2) and gastrointestinal (n=2) bleeds in 3 VWD2A and 1 VWD1C. 11/12 deliveries had excellent/good outcome with poor response in only one VWD1C who required VWF concentrates after caesarean section. All the 11/25 cases with minor surgeries had excellent outcomes. Among the 14/25 major surgeries [abdominal (n=5), hysterectomy (n=3), tonsillectomy (n=3), orthopaedic and others (n=3)] 2 episodes (partial resection of kidney in VWD2A and tonsillectomy in VWD1) were rated poor. Side effects (16 cases) were mainly minor (flushing, headache, tachycardia) with water retention reported only in 2 patients who received >12 doses of DDAVP for delivery or major surgery. Conclusions: DDAVP is an effective, safe and cheap treatment for managing patients with mild-moderate VWD who showed complete biological response to this drug. Therefore, DDAVP must be always recommended as first line therapy in responsive VWD not only in bleeds and oral surgery but also in deliveries and major surgeries. On the other hands, DDAVP should be used with caution in VWD2A and VWD1 with partial response. The additional use of EACA/TA should be considered especially when DDAVP is required for more than 4 days. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Phase II prospective open-label trial of recombinant interleukin-11 in women with mild von Willebrand disease and refractory menorrhagia

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1160/th11-04-0274 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 106 (10) ◽

pp. 641-645 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Rachel Jankowitz ◽

Kristen Jaworski ◽

Elizabeth Merricks ◽

Mark Kloos ◽

Timothy Nichols ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Single Centre ◽

Open Label ◽

Menstrual Cycles ◽

Open Label Trial ◽

Von Willebrand ◽

Interleukin 11 ◽

Healthcare Need

SummaryLack of effective treatment for menorrhagia is the greatest unmet healthcare need in women with von Willebrand disease (VWD). We conducted a single-centre phase II clinical trial to determine efficacy and safety of recombinant IL-11 (rhIL-11, Neumega®) given subcutaneously for up to seven days during six consecutive menstrual cycles each in seven women with mild VWD and menorrhagia refractory to haemostatic or hormonal agents. rhIL-11 reduced menstrual bleeding severity as measured by pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) ≥50% (to <100) in 71% of subjects, cycle severity ≥50% in 71%, and bleeding duration ≥2 days in 85%, all p≤0.01. After rhIL-11, plasma VWF:RCo increased 1.1-fold, but did not correlate with PBAC, r=0.116, bleeding duration, r=0.318, or cycle severity, r=-0.295, or hsCRP, r=-0.003, all p>0.05. Platelet VWF mRNA expression by quantitative PCR increased mean four-fold (1.0–13.5). rhIL-11 was well tolerated with grade 1 or less fluid retention, flushing, conjunctival erythema, and local bruising. In summary, rhIL-11 reduces menorrhagia safely and warrants further study.

Download Full-text

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Novel High-Purity, Double Virus-Inactivated VWF/FVIII-Concentrate in the Treatment of Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) - Clinical Experience in the Treatment of Bleeding and Surgery.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.2144.2144 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 2144-2144

Author(s):

B.A. Schwartz ◽

J. Windyga ◽

M. von Depka ◽

O. Walter ◽

M. Jansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Surgical Procedures ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Open Label ◽

Prophylactic Regimen ◽

Acute Bleeding ◽

Good Efficacy ◽

Bleeding Episodes ◽

Type 3

Abstract Introduction: Wilate is a highly purified, double viral inactivated, VWF/FVIII-concentrate developed for the treatment of VWD. A program of prospective studies was conducted in VWD patients to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Wilate® in acute bleeding episodes, prophylaxis and surgical procedures. Methods: In these prospective open label studies 70 VWD patients (37 VWD of type 3) were treated with the VWF/FVIII concentrate Wilate and followed to assess clinical efficacy and tolerability. Dosing and monitoring were performed using FVIII assays. This is standard practice in most of the study sites and was feasible because of the product’s physiological 1:1 ratio and parallel PK profiles of FVIII and VWF. Dosing decisions were based on established guidelines and the investigators’ clinical judgment. The efficacy of the product was rated on a four-point scale by the investigator. Results: Bleeding- 43 patients (25 of type 3) were treated for a total number of 1088 bleeding episodes (BE). The median dose per exposure day (ED) was calculated to be 31 IU VWF/FVIII:C/kg and were treated for a median of 1.2 days, with excellent or good efficacy achieved in 96% of treatments. Surgery- Efficacy and safety was also studied in 31 VWD patients who underwent 54 elective or urgent surgical procedures of which 27 were classified as major; the overall efficacy was rated as excellent or good in most cases (94%), with a mean dose per infusion being 34 IU VWF/FVIII:C/kg. Pediatric Use- A total of 8 children below 12 years of age with 310 BE s were treated, with an excellent/good efficacy in 98% of bleedings. Prophylaxis- 19 patients were on a prophylactic regimen for more than 10 consecutive weeks (total of 2,338 ED), with an overall reduction of bleeding frequency. Tolerability - Out of 5,662 rated infusions in all studies, the tolerability was assessed as “very good” or “good” in 99% of the cases. Conclusions: The results of the prospective clinical trial program demonstrate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of this VWF/FVIII concentrate for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes, prophylaxis and surgical procedures in patients with VWD.

Download Full-text