Regional Pride and Prejudice in Programs and Policies - Lester F. Goodchild, Richard W. Jonsen, Patty Limerick, & David A. Longanecker, Editors. Higher Education in the American West: Regional History and State Contexts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. xxii + 318 pp. (hardback), $100. - Lester F. Goodchild, Richard W. Jonsen, Patty Limerick, & David A. Longanecker, Editors. Public Policy Challenges Facing Higher Education in the American West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. xx + 223 pp. (hardback), $100.

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-253
Author(s):  
John R. Thelin
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pham Dinh Long ◽  
Nguyen Minh Doi ◽  
Do Sa Ky

In the policy process of higher education, the higher education institutions not only play a role in the policy making process, but also are directly affected by the policies toward building quality culture in their organizations. From this perspective, the paper uses the policy cycle model combined with the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) of Kingdon (1984) and the quality culture model of the European Union Association (EUA) in order to analyze, clarify and propose groups of solutions to enhance the critical role of higher education institutions in policy process. Keywords Policy entrepreneurs; quality culture; multiple streams framework References [1] Viennet, Romane, and Beatriz Pont. "Education Policy Implementation: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162." OECD Publishing (2017). [2] Howells, J., R. Ramlogan, and S. L. Cheng, The role, context and typology of universities and higher education institutions in innovation systems: A UK perspective, Discussion Papers and Project Reports, Impact of Higher Education Institutions on Regional Economics: A Joint Research Initiative, 2008.[3] Dill, David D, and Maarja Soo, Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems, Higher education 49.4: 495-533, 2005.[4] Kraft, Michael E., and Scott R. Furlong. Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Sage, 2012.[5] Kingdon, John W, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edition, New York and London, Longman, 2003.[6] Weick, Karl E, The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed, New York, Random House, 1979.[7] Feldman, Martha S, Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Kaking, Vol. 231, Stanford University Press, 1989.[8] March, James G, Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Simon and Schuster, 1994.[9] Wilson, James Q, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, Basic Books, 1989.[10] Chow, Anthony, Understanding policy change: multiple streams and national education curriculum policy in Hong Kong, Journal of Public Administration and Governance 4.2 (2014) 49.[12] Zhou, Nan, and Feng Feng, Applying Multiple Streams Theoretical Framework to college matriculation policy reform for children of migrant workers in China, Public Policy and Administration Research 4.10 (2014) 1.[12] Ha, Bui Thi Thu, Tolib Mirzoev, and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, Shaping the health policy agenda: the case of safe motherhood policy in Vietnam, International journal of health policy and management 4.11 (2015) 741.[13] Kane, Sumit, The Health Policy Process in Vietnam: Going Beyond Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Theory: Comment on “Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam”, International journal of health policy and management 5.7 (2016) 435.[14] European University Association, Quality Culture in European Countries: A Bottom-Up Approach, EUA Publications, 2006. [15] Liên hiệp các hội khoa học và kỹ thuật Việt Nam, Bản kiến nghị đề xuất một số biện pháp nhằm tiến tới cải cách triệt để và toàn diện nền giáo dục VN, 2005.[16] Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O'Leary, The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government, Public Administration Review 65.5 (2005) 547.


Author(s):  
Kanti Bajpai

Every ranking system rates Indian universities poorly against their Asian counterparts in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea, and in some cases, even universities in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The question then is why, given that in 1947 it could fairly be said that at least a dozen Indian universities were leaders in Asia and were of international repute, Indian universities are in an egregious condition. This chapter essays some answers. It also argues for curricular reform, in particular for the introduction of public policy studies at the major Indian universities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document