Current evidence for closure of a patent foramen ovale for cryptogenic stroke prevention

2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 551-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Rhone ◽  
N. Chung ◽  
B. Clapp
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foramen Ovale

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy Yuan ◽  
Scott Eric Kasner
Keyword(s):  
Patient Selection ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

The patent foramen ovale (PFO), given its high prevalence in the general population and especially in patients with cryptogenic stroke, has long generated investigation and debate on its propensity for stroke by paradoxical embolism and its management for stroke prevention. The pendulum has swung for percutaneous PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke. Based on a review of current evidence, the benefit from PFO closure relies on careful patient selection: those under the age of 60 years with few to no vascular risk factors and embolic-appearing stroke deemed cryptogenic after thorough evaluation. As these data look towards influencing guideline statements and device approvals in the future, patient selection remains the crucial ingredient for clinical decision making and future trials.

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-150
Author(s):  
Harsha S. Nagarajarao ◽  
Chandra P. Ojha ◽  
Archana Kedar ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Narrow Channel ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Current Guidelines

: Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. : In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO’s for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

Hole in My Heart

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

The presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke, especially in young patients. Medical therapy for patients with stroke and PFO includes antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation. PFO closure is not routinely recommended for stroke prevention.

Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-141
Author(s):  
Robert Belvis ◽  
Joan Marti-Fabregas ◽  
Dolores Cocho ◽  
Josep L. Marti-Vilalta
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Foramen Ovale

Patent foramen ovale

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vafa Alakbarzade ◽  
Tracey Keteepe-Arachi ◽  
Nazia Karsan ◽  
Robin Ray ◽  
Anthony C Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Peripheral Ischaemia ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Pfo Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common anatomical cause of an interatrial shunt. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause paradoxical embolism, manifesting as stroke, myocardial infarction or visceral/peripheral ischaemia. PFO is a risk factor for stroke and may be associated with migraine with aura. New evidence suggests PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in a highly selected population of stroke survivors: those aged 60 years or younger with a cryptogenic stroke syndrome, a large right-to-left shunt, an atrial septal aneurysm and no evidence of atrial fibrillation. They benefit from percutaneous PFO closure in addition to antiplatelet therapy, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone. Current evidence does not support PFO closure in the treatment of migraine.

Patent foramen ovale closure for secondary stroke prevention

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (28) ◽  
pp. 2339-2350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Alkhouli ◽  
Horst Sievert ◽  
David R Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Future Landscape ◽  
Pfo Closure ◽  
Open Issues

Abstract Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke is gaining momentum after the recent publication of four randomized clinical trials suggesting its benefit. This article provides a contemporary overview of the anatomy and pathophysiology of PFO, the available diagnostic tools for the assessment and risk stratification of PFO, and the current and future landscape of PFO closure devices and their optimal utilization. It also summarizes the current data on PFO closure for stroke prevention, and discusses the remaining open issues in the field of PFO closure.

Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Belvis ◽  
Joan Marti-Fabregas ◽  
Dolores Cocho ◽  
Josep L. Marti-Vilalta
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Foramen Ovale

Stroke Prophylaxis by Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Left Atrial Appendage

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Antonio L Bartorelli ◽  
Claudio Tondo ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Percutaneous Procedures ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events

Innovative percutaneous procedures for stroke prevention have emerged in the last two decades. Transcatheter closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is performed in patients who suffered a cryptogenic stroke or a transient ischaemic attach (TIA) in order to prevent recurrence of thromboembolic events. Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been introduced to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of PFO and LAA in the occurrence of cerebrovascular events and the interventional device-based therapies to occlude the PFO and LAA are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document