Patent foramen ovale

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vafa Alakbarzade ◽  
Tracey Keteepe-Arachi ◽  
Nazia Karsan ◽  
Robin Ray ◽  
Anthony C Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Peripheral Ischaemia ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Pfo Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common anatomical cause of an interatrial shunt. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause paradoxical embolism, manifesting as stroke, myocardial infarction or visceral/peripheral ischaemia. PFO is a risk factor for stroke and may be associated with migraine with aura. New evidence suggests PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in a highly selected population of stroke survivors: those aged 60 years or younger with a cryptogenic stroke syndrome, a large right-to-left shunt, an atrial septal aneurysm and no evidence of atrial fibrillation. They benefit from percutaneous PFO closure in addition to antiplatelet therapy, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone. Current evidence does not support PFO closure in the treatment of migraine.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of endovascular patent foramen ovale closure: the first results of a Russian multicenter study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
D. V. Ognerubov ◽  
A. S. Tereshchenko ◽  
A. N. Samko ◽  
G. К. Arutyunyan ◽  
O. A. Sivakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
History Of ◽  
Pfo Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detectable in more than 25% of the adult population and is generally clinically insignificant. However, it can be a cause of paradoxical embolism in some cases. Randomized trials indicate that endovascular PFO closure in patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke is an effective method for the secondary prevention of catastrophic brain damage.Objective: to study the safety and efficiency of endovascular PFO closure in young patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke.Patients and methods. Sixty-two patients, including (22 males and 40 females) women, underwent percutaneous PFO closure in May 2018 to March 2020. The patients' mean age was 37.4±7.6 years. The inclusion criteria were a prior cryptogenic ischemic stroke lasting less than 12 months and PFO with a high risk for paradoxical embolism (PFO concurrent with atrial septal aneurysm or hypermobility; PFO, ≥2 mm size; the presence of the Chiari network and/or the Eustachian valve).Results and discussion. The technical success of the operation was achieved in all cases. In 50 (80.6%) patients, the right chamber of the heart was completely isolated from the left one in the first 3 months. During the first year, the atria were also completely isolated in 10 (16.1%) patients. A left-to-right shunt persisted in 2 (3.2%) patents 12 months later. Two patients were found to have main procedural complications: one had perioperative atrial fibrillation and the other had pseudoaneurysm formation at the puncture site.Conclusion. Endovascular PFO closure is a safe and effective operation for the secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. In our study, blood shunting through the PFO was stopped in 96.6% of patients at less than 6 months after surgery, which suggests that there is a rapid and effective reduction in the risk of paradoxical embolism.

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-150
Author(s):  
Harsha S. Nagarajarao ◽  
Chandra P. Ojha ◽  
Archana Kedar ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Narrow Channel ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Current Guidelines

: Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. : In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO’s for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

scholarly journals Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhanang Ali Yafi ◽  
Azmi Azmi
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Arterial Circulation ◽  
Systemic Embolization ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Pfo Closure

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common disorder that affects between 20-34% of the adult population. This condition is a benign finding for most people. However, In some the PFO can open widely and enabling paradoxical embolism to transit from venous to arterial circulation, which is associated with stroke and systemic embolization. There are still unclear to date regarding the effectiveness of pharmacological anticoagulant therapy, defined as antithrombin or antiplatelet therapy, which has proven to be more beneficial for patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke. In addition, surgical and transcutaneous PFO closure has been proposed for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke with PFO. Both catheter-based and surgical modes of closure have been shown to reduce the incidence of subsequent embolism substantially. This review will discuss the evidence regarding the relationship between PFO and cryptogenic stroke and decision making for management strategies.

PP122 A Quick Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure In Korean Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 112-113
Author(s):  
Jeonghoon Ahn ◽  
Eung Ju Kim ◽  
Kyungmi Oh ◽  
Justin Seung-Ho Yoo ◽  
Maria Koullick
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Pfo Closure

Introduction:Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an open hole between the right and left upper chambers of the heart. It may increase the risk of stroke, so closure of the hole is considered a secondary prevention in patients who have experienced cryptogenic stroke. Recent evidence has been published on the effectiveness of PFO closure, including a publicly funded prospective study on the effectiveness of PFO closure for preventing recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack in selected Korean patients who have experienced cryptogenic stroke. The objective of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of PFO closure using this recent evidence.Methods:Available clinical data from the aforementioned Korean prospective study and other recent multicenter trials funded by public bodies were used. The cost data were obtained from the current Korean National Health Insurance fee schedule. Utility data were extracted from local research on stroke patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis, based on a 20-year Markov model, was conducted using these data to compare PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy with oral anticoagulants alone.Results:The initial analysis showed that PFO plus antiplatelet therapy costs KRW 7.13 million (USD 6,547) more than oral anticoagulants alone but has a higher utility of 1.3 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient, which corresponds to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of KRW 5.6 million (USD 5,142) per QALY. The implicit Korean ICER threshold is KRW 25 million (USD 22,955) for non-cancer drugs, so it seems that PFO plus antiplatelet therapy is cost effective in the Korean setting.Conclusions:Since this study used some transition probabilities from foreign sources, the results may not be completely transferable to the Korean setting. However, this is the best available evidence so far in Korea for the economic evaluation of the PFO closure procedure. Therefore, use of PFO closure in carefully selected patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke may benefit the public payer in Korea.

Closing the Patent Foramen Ovale with Amplatzer Devices

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Bernhard Meier ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Residual Shunt ◽  
Catheter Closure ◽  
Pfo Closure

The relative risk of a thromboembolic event is four-fold higher in the 25–35% of adults with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and 33-fold higher in patients who also have an atrial septal aneurysm. The American PICSS trial showed a yearly incidence of stroke or death after an initial event of 5% with warfarin and 9% with acetylsalicylic acid. The presence of a PFO more than doubles the mortality rate in patients with clinically relevant pulmonary embolism. The risk of a PFO increases with age. Proof of effectiveness in migraine alleviation is likely to be achievable in a couple of years – much quicker than in prevention of paradoxical embolism. Percutaneous closure of PFO has been performed with various devices at the University Hospital Bern in Switzerland since April 1994, with over 1,000 patients treated. At the last available transoesophageal echocardiogram, a significant residual shunt persisted in 4% with Amplatzer devices and 17% with other devices. During follow-up, a recurrent embolic event was observed in 1.6% of patients per year – less than would be expected under medical treatment. Several randomised multicentre trials comparing catheter closure with medical treatment have been started. The PC and CLOSURE trials are in the follow-up phase; results cannot be expected before 2010, and they may well be ‘falsely’ neutral because the follow-up is rather short for the low-risk patients randomised. In a matched control study on patients with cryptogenic stroke and a PFO, 158 patients were treated medically and 150 concomitant patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure. At four years, PFO closure resulted in a trend towards risk reduction of death, stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (9 versus 24%; p=0.08) compared with medical treatment. The calculated occurrence of patients with cryptogenic strokes associated with a PFO amounts to somewhere between 100 and 300 per year and per million population, corresponding to more than 10% of yearly coronary angioplasty cases. Coronary and peripheral paradoxical emboli without prior exclusion of competing causes plus the presumed associations between PFO and migraine or decompression illness in divers open additional vast fields of potential indications for catheter closure. Finally, the linearly decreasing prevalence of a PFO with age suggests a weeding out of PFO carriers (unless spontaneous closure is assumed). A PFO represents a lethal threat that increases with age. It can be closed percutaneously in 15 minutes virtually free of complications. The patient can resume unrestricted physical activities a few hours after the intervention.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy Yuan ◽  
Scott Eric Kasner
Keyword(s):  
Patient Selection ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

The patent foramen ovale (PFO), given its high prevalence in the general population and especially in patients with cryptogenic stroke, has long generated investigation and debate on its propensity for stroke by paradoxical embolism and its management for stroke prevention. The pendulum has swung for percutaneous PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke. Based on a review of current evidence, the benefit from PFO closure relies on careful patient selection: those under the age of 60 years with few to no vascular risk factors and embolic-appearing stroke deemed cryptogenic after thorough evaluation. As these data look towards influencing guideline statements and device approvals in the future, patient selection remains the crucial ingredient for clinical decision making and future trials.

scholarly journals Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE)–Estimated Attributable Fraction Correlates With the Benefit of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 3119-3123
Author(s):  
David M. Kent ◽  
Jeffrey L. Saver ◽  
Robin Ruthazer ◽  
Anthony J. Furlan ◽  
Mark Reisman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Relative Risk Reduction ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Attributable Fraction ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

Background and Purpose: In patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO), the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Score has been proposed as a method to estimate a patient-specific “PFO-attributable fraction”—the probability that a documented PFO is causally-related to the stroke, rather than an incidental finding. The objective of this research is to examine the relationship between this RoPE-estimated PFO-attributable fraction and the effect of closure in 3 randomized trials. Methods: We pooled data from the CLOSURE-I (Evaluation of the STARFlex Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack due to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism through a Patent Foramen Ovale), RESPECT (Randomized Evaluation of Recurrent Stroke Comparing PFO Closure to Established Current Standard of Care Treatment), and PC (Clinical Trial Comparing Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale [PFO] Using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder With Medical Treatment in Patients With Cryptogenic Embolism) trials. We examine the treatment effect of closure in high RoPE score (≥7) versus low RoPE score (<7) patients. We also estimated the relative risk reduction associated with PFO closure across each level of the RoPE score using Cox proportional hazard analysis. We estimated a patient-specific attributable fraction using a PC trial–compatible (9-point) RoPE equation (omitting the neuroradiology variable), as well as a 2-trial analysis using the original (10-point) RoPE equation. We examined the Pearson correlation between the estimated attributable fraction and the relative risk reduction across RoPE strata. Results: In the low RoPE score group (<7, n=912), the rate of recurrent strokes per 100 person-years was 1.37 in the device arm versus 1.68 in the medical arm (hazard ratio, 0.82 [0.42–1.59] P =0.56) compared with 0.30 versus 1.03 (hazard ratio, 0.31 [0.11–0.85] P =0.02) in the high RoPE score group (≥7, n=1221); treatment-by-RoPE score group interaction, P =0.12. The RoPE score estimated attributable fraction anticipated the relative risk reduction across all levels of the RoPE score, in both the 3-trial ( r =0.95, P <0.001) and 2-trial ( r =0.92, P <0.001) analyses. Conclusions: The RoPE score estimated attributable fraction is highly correlated to the relative risk reduction of device versus medical therapy. This observation suggests the RoPE score identifies patients with cryptogenic stroke who are likely to have a PFO that is pathogenic rather than incidental.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e023761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Mir ◽  
Reed Alexander C Siemieniuk ◽  
Long Cruz Ge ◽  
Farid Foroutan ◽  
Michael Fralick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
External Evidence ◽  
Pfo Closure

ObjectiveTo examine the relative impact of three management options in patients aged <60 years with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale (PFO): PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone and anticoagulation alone.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) supported by complementary external evidence.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing PFO closure and/or medical therapies in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.Review methodsWe conducted an NMA complemented with external evidence and rated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.ResultsTen RCTs in eight studies proved eligible (n=4416). Seven RCTs (n=3913) addressed PFO closure versus medical therapy. Of these, three (n=1257) addressed PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy, three (n=2303) addressed PFO closure versus mixed antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies and one (n=353) addressed PFO closure versus anticoagulation. The remaining three RCTs (n=503) addressed anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy. PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy probably results in substantial reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence (risk difference per 1000 patients over 5 years (RD): −87, 95% credible interval (CrI) −100 to −33; moderate certainty). Compared with anticoagulation, PFO closure may confer little or no difference in ischaemic stroke recurrence (low certainty) but probably has a lower risk of major bleeding (RD −20, 95% CrI −27 to −2, moderate certainty). Relative to either medical therapy, PFO closure probably increases the risk of persistent atrial fibrillation (RD 18, 95% CI +5 to +56, moderate certainty) and device-related adverse events (RD +36, 95% CI +23 to +50, high certainty). Anticoagulation, compared with antiplatelet therapy, may reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke recurrence (RD −71, 95% CrI −100 to +17, low certainty), but probably increases the risk of major bleeding (RD +12, 95% CrI −5 to +65, moderate certainty).ConclusionsIn patients aged <60 years, PFO closure probably confers an important reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence compared with antiplatelet therapy alone but may make no difference compared with anticoagulation. PFO closure incurs a risk of persistent atrial fibrillation and device-related adverse events. Compared with alternatives, anticoagulation probably increases major bleeding.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017081567.

Hole in My Heart

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

The presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke, especially in young patients. Medical therapy for patients with stroke and PFO includes antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation. PFO closure is not routinely recommended for stroke prevention.

scholarly journals Importance of Persistent Right-to-Left Shunt After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-249
Author(s):  
Lu He ◽  
Gesheng Cheng ◽  
Yajuan Du ◽  
Yushun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Pfo Closure

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is widely performed to prevent recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with cryptogenic stroke. However, the influence of different degrees of right-to-left shunting (RLS) has rarely been reported. We retrospectively evaluated the cases of 268 patients with cryptogenic stroke who underwent PFO closure at our hospital from April 2012 through April 2015. In accordance with RLS severity, we divided the patients into 2 groups: persistent RLS during normal breathing and the Valsalva maneuver (n=112) and RLS only during the Valsalva maneuver (n=156). Baseline characteristics, morphologic features, and procedural and follow-up data were reviewed. The primary endpoint was stroke or transient ischemic attack. More patients in the persistent group had multiple or bilateral ischemic lesions, as well as a larger median PFO diameter (2.5 mm [range, 1.8–3.9 mm]) than did patients in the Valsalva maneuver group (1.3 mm [range, 0.9–1.9 mm]) (P &lt;0.001). Atrial septal aneurysm was more frequent in the persistent group: 25 patients (22.3%) compared with 18 (11.5%) (P=0.018). Three patients in the persistent group had residual shunting. The annual risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was similar between groups: 0.298% (persistent) and 0.214% (Valsalva maneuver). Our findings suggest that patients with persistent RLS have more numerous severe ischemic lesions, larger PFOs, and a higher incidence of atrial septal aneurysm than do those without. Although our persistent group had a greater risk of residual shunting after PFO closure, recurrence of ischemic events did not differ significantly from that in the Valsalva maneuver group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document