Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407 503 schoolchildren

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-907
Author(s):  
Richard Reading
Author(s):  
Homero Flores Mendoza ◽  
Anjana Chandran ◽  
Carlos Hernandez-Nieto ◽  
Ally Murji ◽  
Lisa Allen ◽  
...  

Objective: Compare maternal and perinatal outcomes between emergency and elective caesarean-hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders managed by a multidisciplinary team. Design and setting: Single-centre retrospective cohort study Population: 125 cases of antenatally suspected and pathologically confirmed PAS disorder. Methods: Maternal and perinatal outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations, adjusting for potential confounders. Survival curves exploring risk factors for emergency delivery were sought. Main Outcome Measures: Maternal outcomes including hemorrhagic morbidity, operative complications. Perinatal outcomes included gestational age at delivery, birthweight, Apgar scores and perinatal death. Results: 25 (20%) and 100 (80%) patients had emergency and elective delivery, respectively. Emergency delivery had a higher estimated blood loss (median IQR 2772 [2256.75] vs. 1561.19 [1152.95], p<0.001), with a higher rate of coagulopathy (40 vs. 6%; p<0.001) and bladder injury (44 vs. 13%; p<0.001). Emergency delivery was associated with increased rates of blood transfusion (aOR 4.9, CI95% 1.3-17.5, p=0.01), coagulopathy (aOR 16.4, CI95% 2.6-101.4, p=0.002) and urinary tract injury (aOR 6.96, CI95% 1.5-30.7, p=0.01). Gestational age at delivery was lower in the emergency group (mean SD 35.19 [2.77] vs. 31.55 [4.75], p=0.001), no difference in perinatal mortality was found (aOR 0.01, CI95% <0.001-17.5, p=0.53). A sonographically short cervix and/or history of APH had an increased cumulative risk of emergency delivery with advancing gestational age. Conclusions: Patients with PAS disorders managed in a tertiary centre by a multidisciplinary team requiring emergency delivery have increased maternal morbidity and poorer perinatal outcomes than those with elective delivery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. e195-e199
Author(s):  
Fatima Estrada ◽  
Scarlett Karakash ◽  
Terry SeeToe ◽  
Jeremy Weedon ◽  
Howard Minkoff

Objective Multiple authors have suggested cerclage position is a determinant of “success.” We assessed the interaction between cervical length (CL), cerclage height (cerH), proximal residual length (PRL), gestational age at delivery, and rate of delivery ≤ 34 weeks, in this study. Study Design Present study is a retrospective cohort study of all cerclages placed at Maimonides Medical Center from 2006 to 2016. Outcomes: gestational age at delivery and delivery before 34 weeks; predictors: PRL, cerH, CL; and indications for cerclage: history (Hx), physical exam (PE), and ultrasound (US) indicated cerclage. A general linear model was used to predict power-transformed age at delivery from cerH, CL, and indication for cerclage. Subanalyses by indication were conducted. Logistic regression was used for delivery ≤ 34 weeks. Results The cerH by indication did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.090). When stratified by indications, the effect of cerH on age at delivery was apparent for Hx (adjusted R 2 = 0.18, p < 0.001) and PE (adjusted R 2 = 0.43, p = 0.004) cerclages but not for US cerclages (adjusted R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.206). Logistic regression predicting delivery ≤ 34 weeks (n = 29) produced similar results. Conclusions For Hx and PE indicated cerclages, the location of the stitch may influence the timing of delivery. Specifically, the higher the cerclage, the more advanced the gestational age at delivery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fustolo-Gunnink ◽  
R. Vlug ◽  
V. Smits-Wintjens ◽  
E. Heckman ◽  
A. Te Pas ◽  
...  

Neonatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Melissa Lorenzo ◽  
Megan Laupacis ◽  
Wilma M. Hopman ◽  
Imtiaz Ahmad ◽  
Faiza Khurshid

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Late preterm infants (LPIs) are infants born between 34<sup>0/7</sup> and 36<sup>6/7</sup> weeks gestation. Morbidities in these infants are commonly considered a result of prematurity; however, some research has suggested immaturity may not be the sole cause of morbidities. We hypothesize that antecedents leading to late preterm birth are associated with different patterns of morbidities and that morbidities are the result of gestational age superimposed by the underlying etiologies of preterm delivery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective cohort study of late preterm neonates born at a single tertiary care center. We examined neonatal morbidities including apnea of prematurity, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, and the requirement for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of each morbidity associated with 3 categorized antecedents of delivery, that is, spontaneous preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), and medically indicated birth. We calculated the predictive probability of each antecedent resulting in individual morbidity across gestational ages. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 279 LPIs were included in the study. Decreasing gestational age was associated with significantly increased risk of apnea of prematurity, hyperbilirubinemia, and requirement of CPAP. In our cohort, the risk of hypoglycemia increased with gestational age, with the greatest incidence at 36<sup>0−6</sup> weeks. There was no significant association of risk of selected morbidities and the antecedents of late preterm delivery, with or without adjustment for gestational age, multiple gestation, small for gestational age (SGA), antenatal steroids, and delivery method. <b><i>Discussion and Conclusion:</i></b> This study found no difference in morbidity risk related to 3 common antecedents of preterm birth in LPIs. Our research suggests that immaturity is the primary factor in determining adverse outcomes, intensified by factors resulting in prematurity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Zeng ◽  
Erica Erwin ◽  
Wendy Wen ◽  
Daniel J. Corsi ◽  
Shi Wu Wen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Racial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes have been studied in other countries, but little has been done for the Canadian population. In this study, we sought to examine the disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians in Ontario, Canada. Methods We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study that included all Asian and Caucasian women who attended a prenatal screening and resulted in a singleton birth in an Ontario hospital (April 1st, 2015-March 31st, 2017). Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the independent adjusted relative risks and adjusted risk difference of adverse perinatal outcomes for Asians compared with Caucasians. Results Among 237,293 eligible women, 31% were Asian and 69% were Caucasian. Asians were at an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, placental previa, early preterm birth (< 32 weeks), preterm birth, emergency cesarean section, 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears, low birth weight (< 2500 g, < 1500 g), small-for-gestational-age (<10th percentile, <3rd percentile), neonatal intensive care unit admission, and hyperbilirubinemia requiring treatment, but had lower risks of preeclampsia, macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), large-for-gestational-age neonates, 5-min Apgar score < 7, and arterial cord pH ≤7.1, as compared with Caucasians. No difference in risk of elective cesarean section was observed between Asians and Caucasians. Conclusion There are significant differences in several adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians. These differences should be taken into consideration for clinical practices due to the large Asian population in Canada.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document