Investigating the long-term effects of a psychiatric rehabilitation programme for persons with serious mental illness in the community: a follow-up study

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (19-20) ◽  
pp. 2712-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L Luk
1995 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. DeSisto ◽  
Courtenay M. Harding ◽  
Rodney V. McCormick ◽  
Takamaru Ashikaga ◽  
George W. Brooks

BackgroundThis study compared long-term outcome of serious mental illness in two states using a matched design to assess psychiatric rehabilitation programmes; Vermont subjects participated in a model psychiatric rehabilitation programme, while the Maine group received more traditional care.MethodMaine and Vermont subjects (n = 269) were matched by age, sex, diagnosis, and chronicity. Demographic, illness, and life history information were abstracted from hospital records by clinicians blind to outcome. DSM–III criteria were applied retrospectively. Outcome was assessed by clinicians blind to history.ResultsVermont subjects alive at follow-up (n = 180) were more productive (P < 0.0009), had fewer symptoms (P < 0.002), better community adjustment (P < 0.001) and global functioning (P < 0.0001) than Maine subjects (n = 119).ConclusionsOutcome differences may be due to Vermont's model programme and a policy of allowing an earlier opportunity for community life.


2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veerle Visser-Vandewalle ◽  
Chris van der Linden ◽  
Yasin Temel ◽  
Halime Celik ◽  
Linda Ackermans ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Galhardo ◽  
Marina Cunha ◽  
José Pinto‐Gouveia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document