Evaluation of three pesticide leaching models with experimental data for alachlor, atrazine and metribuzin

Weed Research ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. WALKER ◽  
S. J. WELCH ◽  
A. MELACINI ◽  
Y.-H. MOON
2020 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 01008
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Belik ◽  
Anna Kokoreva ◽  
Victoria Kolupaeva

The phenomenon of preferential migration of substances can increase the risk of pesticides. In the first year of the experiment, in 7 days after application cyantraniliprole penetrated to a depth of 25 cm in agrosoddy-podzolic soil. In the next year on the 7th day after application the pesticide was detected at a depth of 15 cm. The pesticide migrated deeper than the unconfigured PERL model took into account. The calibration of the PERL model by using experimental data (soil experimental support) allowed to reduce the error of prediction. The obtained data can be used to create new standard soil and climate scenarios for pesticide leaching models.


2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A Garratt ◽  
Ettore Capri ◽  
Marco Trevisan ◽  
Giuseppe Errera ◽  
Richard M Wilkins

Author(s):  
Rômulo Júnior ◽  
Renê Rigitano ◽  
Jos Boesten

The use of Pesticide Leaching Models (PLM) for risk assessment may be an efficient and attractive way of assessing solutions to some agricultural and environmental problems. Many countries of the European Union and the USA have been using PLM for risk assessment already for a few decades. This chapter has the aim to present a successful application of two PLM (i.e. MACRO and PEARL) in a Brazilian very intensive agricultural area to simulate moisture profiles and the leaching of a water flow tracer (i.e. bromide) and the pesticides cyproconazole and thiamethoxam. Also attempts to summarize the available knowledge about the processes governing pesticide behavior in soil, types and classifications of PLM, the use of PLM for risk assessment at European Union, a theoretical description of PEARL and MACRO models and their testing in a Brazilian agricultural field scenario.


1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1183-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Thorsen ◽  
Peter R. Jørgensen ◽  
Gitte Felding ◽  
Ole H. Jacobsen ◽  
Niels H. Spliid ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian C. Armstrong ◽  
Andrew M. Portwood ◽  
Peter B. Leeds-Harrison ◽  
Graham L. Harris ◽  
John A Catt

2002 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor G Dubus ◽  
Sabine Beulke ◽  
Colin D Brown

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document